13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      “It's Not Broke, So Let's Not Try to Fix It”: Why Patients Decline a Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device : REASONS FOR REFUSING CIED THERAPY

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Few patients decline therapy of a cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED), and little is known about the characteristics or reasoning of those who do. Our objective was to describe the reasons why patients decline CIED implantation using qualitative methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Pacemaker and defibrillator lead extraction.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient and cardiologist perceptions on decision making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a qualitative study.

            Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in selected patients, they are also associated with potential risks. Periprocedural decision making requires understanding both benefits and risks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ironic technology: Old age and the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in US health care.

              We take the example of cardiac devices, specifically the implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or ICD, to explore the complex cultural role of technology in medicine today. We focus on persons age 80 and above, for whom ICD use is growing in the U.S. We highlight an ironic feature of this device. While it postpones death and 'saves' life by thwarting a lethal heart rhythm, it also prolongs living in a state of dying from heart failure. In that regard the ICD is simultaneously a technology of life extension and dying. We explore that irony among the oldest age group -- those whose considerations of medical interventions are framed by changing societal assumptions of what constitutes premature death, the appropriate time for death and medicine's goals in an aging society. Background to the rapidly growing use of this device among the elderly is the 'technological imperative' in medicine, bolstered today by the value given to evidence-based studies. We show how evidence contributes to standards of care and to the expansion of Medicare reimbursement criteria. Together, those factors shape the ethical necessity of physicians offering and patients accepting the ICD in late life. Two ethnographic examples document the ways in which those factors are lived in treatment discussions and in expectations about death and longevity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
                Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
                Wiley
                01478389
                October 2014
                October 2014
                June 01 2014
                : 37
                : 10
                : 1306-1314
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Program in Professionalism and Ethics; Mayo Clinic; Rochester Minnesota
                [2 ]Division of General Internal Medicine; Mayo Clinic; Rochester Minnesota
                [3 ]Department of Anthropology, History, and Social Medicine; University of California; San Francisco California
                Article
                10.1111/pace.12433
                4393709
                24889010
                b6530ea0-37f6-4d5e-b968-a1ef36d181a1
                © 2014

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article