16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Palaeopathological evidence for intraspecific combat in ankylosaurid dinosaurs

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6
      Biology Letters
      The Royal Society

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ankylosaurid dinosaurs were heavily armoured herbivores with tails modified into club-like weapons. These tail clubs have widely been considered defensive adaptations wielded against predatory theropod dinosaurs. Here we argue instead that ankylosaurid tail clubs were sexually selected structures used primarily for intraspecific combat. We found pathological osteoderms (armour plates) in the holotype specimen of Zuul crurivastator , which are localized to the flanks in the hip region rather than distributed randomly across the body, consistent with injuries inflicted by lateral tail-swinging and ritualized combat. We failed to find convincing evidence for predation as a key selective pressure in the evolution of the tail club. High variation in tail club size through time, and delayed ontogenetic growth of the tail club further support the sexual selection hypothesis. There is little doubt that the tail club could have been used in defence when needed, but our results suggest that sexual selection drove the evolution of this impressive weapon. This changes the prevailing view of ankylosaurs, suggesting they were behaviorally complex animals that likely engaged in ritualized combat for social dominance as in other ornithischian dinosaurs and mammals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Evolution of Animal Weapons

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The allometry of ornaments and weapons.

            Exaggerated male traits that have evolved under sexual selection include ornaments to attract mates and weapons to deter rivals. Data from studies of many such traits in diverse kinds of organisms show that they almost universally exhibit positive allometries. Both ornaments and weapons increase disproportionately with overall body size, resulting in scaling exponents within species that are consistently >1.0 and usually in the range 1.5-2.5. We show how scaling exponents reflect the relative fitness advantages of ornaments vs. somatic growth by using a simple mathematical model of resource allocation during ontogeny. Because the scaling exponents are similar for the different taxonomic groups, it follows that the fitness advantages of investing in ornaments also are similar. The model also shows how selection for ornaments influences body size at first reproduction and explains why interspecific allometries have consistently lower exponents than intraspecific ones.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Paleooecology of the Judith River Formation (Campanian) of Dinosaur Provincial Park, Alberta, Canada: Evidence from vertebrate microfossil localities

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Biology Letters
                Biol. Lett.
                The Royal Society
                1744-957X
                December 2022
                December 07 2022
                December 2022
                : 18
                : 12
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Knowledge, Royal BC Museum, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
                [2 ]School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
                [3 ]Paleontology, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC, USA
                [4 ]Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
                [5 ]Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [6 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Article
                10.1098/rsbl.2022.0404
                36475422
                b6108a65-c9f1-4dd0-9497-75d6125bf9e4
                © 2022

                https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article