13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      N 6-methyladenosine modification enables viral RNA to escape recognition by RNA sensor RIG-I

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Internal N 6-methyladenosine (m 6A) modification is one of the most common and abundant modifications of RNA. However, the biological role(s) of viral RNA m 6A remains elusive. Using human metapneumovirus (hMPV) as a model, we demonstrate that m 6A serves as a molecular marker for innate immune discrimination of self from nonself RNAs. We show that hMPV RNAs are m 6A methylated and that viral m 6A methylation promotes hMPV replication and gene expression. Inactivating m 6A addition sites with synonymous mutations or demethylase resulted in m 6A deficient recombinant hMPVs and virion RNAs that induced significantly higher expression of type I interferon (IFN) which was dependent on the cytoplasmic RNA sensor RIG-I, not MDA5. Mechanistically, m 6A-deficient virion RNA induces higher expression of RIG-I, binds more efficiently to RIG-I, and facilitates the conformational change of RIG-I, leading to enhanced IFN expression. Furthermore, m 6A-deficient rhMPVs triggered higher IFN in vivo and were significantly attenuated in cotton rats yet retained high immunogenicity. Collectively, our results highlight that (i) virus acquires m 6A in their RNAs as a means of mimicking cellular RNA to avoid detection by innate immunity; and (ii) viral RNA m 6A can serve as a target to attenuate hMPV for vaccine purposes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          RIG-I-mediated antiviral responses to single-stranded RNA bearing 5'-phosphates.

          Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) produced during viral replication is believed to be the critical trigger for activation of antiviral immunity mediated by the RNA helicase enzymes retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5). We showed that influenza A virus infection does not generate dsRNA and that RIG-I is activated by viral genomic single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) bearing 5'-phosphates. This is blocked by the influenza protein nonstructured protein 1 (NS1), which is found in a complex with RIG-I in infected cells. These results identify RIG-I as a ssRNA sensor and potential target of viral immune evasion and suggest that its ability to sense 5'-phosphorylated RNA evolved in the innate immune system as a means of discriminating between self and nonself.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Transcriptome-wide mapping of N(6)-methyladenosine by m(6)A-seq based on immunocapturing and massively parallel sequencing.

            N(6)-methyladenosine-sequencing (m(6)A-seq) is an immunocapturing approach for the unbiased transcriptome-wide localization of m(6)A in high resolution. To our knowledge, this is the first protocol to allow a global view of this ubiquitous RNA modification, and it is based on antibody-mediated enrichment of methylated RNA fragments followed by massively parallel sequencing. Building on principles of chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) and methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP), read densities of immunoprecipitated RNA relative to untreated input control are used to identify methylated sites. A consensus motif is deduced, and its distance to the point of maximal enrichment is assessed; these measures further corroborate the success of the protocol. Identified locations are intersected in turn with gene architecture to draw conclusions regarding the distribution of m(6)A between and within gene transcripts. When applied to human and mouse transcriptomes, m(6)A-seq generated comprehensive methylation profiles revealing, for the first time, tenets governing the nonrandom distribution of m(6)A. The protocol can be completed within ~9 d for four different sample pairs (each consists of an immunoprecipitation and corresponding input).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              N6-Methyladenosine Modification Controls Circular RNA Immunity

              Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are prevalent in eukaryotic cells and viral genomes. Mammalian cells possess innate immunity to detect foreign circRNAs, but the molecular basis of self vs. foreign identity in circRNA immunity is unknown. Here we show that N6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) RNA modification on human circRNAs inhibits innate immunity. Foreign circRNAs are potent adjuvants to induce antigen-specific T cell activation, antibody production, and anti-tumor immunity in vivo , and m 6 A modification abrogates immune gene activation and adjuvant activity. m 6 A reader YTHDF2 sequesters m 6 A-circRNA and is essential for suppression of innate immunity. Unmodified circRNA, but not m 6 A-modified circRNA, directly activates RNA pattern recognition receptor RIG-I in the presence of lysine-63-linked polyubiquitin chain to cause filamentation of the adaptor protein MAVS and activation of the downstream transcription factor IRF3. CircRNA immunity has considerable parallel to prokaryotic DNA restriction modification system that transforms nucleic acid chemical modification into organismal innate immunity. Mammalian cells distinguish between foreign and endogenous circular RNAs (circRNAs), but the molecular basis is unknown. Chen et al identifies N6-methyladenosine (m 6 A) RNA modification as marker for “self”. Unmodified circRNA but not m 6 A-modified circRNA activates RIG-I in the presence of K63-polyubiquitin to cause MAVS filamentation, IRF3 dimerization, and interferon production.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101674869
                44774
                Nat Microbiol
                Nat Microbiol
                Nature microbiology
                2058-5276
                5 December 2019
                03 February 2020
                April 2020
                03 August 2020
                : 5
                : 4
                : 584-598
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
                [2 ]Department of Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
                [3 ]The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325015, P.R. China
                [4 ]College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, P. R. China
                [5 ]Center for Vaccines and Immunity, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205
                [6 ]Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210
                [7 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
                Author notes
                [¶]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author contributions

                M.L. carried out most of viriological, biochemical, and animal experiments. Z.Z. performed m 6A-seq and analyzed all m 6A data, with the help from B.Z. M.X. measured m 6A levels in host and viral RNA. A. L. performed [ 35S]-Methionine metabolic labeling experiment. S.N., O.H., and X. L. designed and helped animal experiments. T.Z.G. performed some of mutagenesis experiments. M.E.P., Y. X., and Z. F. generated biochemical reagents. J. Z. helped on histology. C. H. supervised m 6A experiments, analyzed the data, and interpreted the results. M.E.P., and S.N. contributed to supervision and data analysis. J. L. directed the project, analyzed the data and wrote the paper, with help from all of the authors.

                [* ]Corresponding author: Department of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, 311 Goss Laboratory, 1925 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210, Phone: (614) 688-2064, Fax: (614) 292-6473, li.926@ 123456osu.edu
                Article
                NIHMS1545034
                10.1038/s41564-019-0653-9
                7137398
                32015498
                b5ee03e8-0a7f-4ee6-8639-03875bd35edd

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article