27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identifying educator behaviours for high quality verbal feedback in health professions education: literature review and expert refinement

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Health professions education is characterised by work-based learning and relies on effective verbal feedback. However the literature reports problems in feedback practice, including lack of both learner engagement and explicit strategies for improving performance. It is not clear what constitutes high quality, learner-centred feedback or how educators can promote it. We hoped to enhance feedback in clinical practice by distinguishing the elements of an educator’s role in feedback considered to influence learner outcomes, then develop descriptions of observable educator behaviours that exemplify them.

          Methods

          An extensive literature review was conducted to identify i) information substantiating specific components of an educator’s role in feedback asserted to have an important influence on learner outcomes and ii) verbal feedback instruments in health professions education, that may describe important educator activities in effective feedback. This information was used to construct a list of elements thought to be important in effective feedback. Based on these elements, descriptions of observable educator behaviours that represent effective feedback were developed and refined during three rounds of a Delphi process and a face-to-face meeting with experts across the health professions and education.

          Results

          The review identified more than 170 relevant articles (involving health professions, education, psychology and business literature) and ten verbal feedback instruments in health professions education (plus modified versions). Eighteen distinct elements of an educator’s role in effective feedback were delineated. Twenty five descriptions of educator behaviours that align with the elements were ratified by the expert panel.

          Conclusions

          This research clarifies the distinct elements of an educator’s role in feedback considered to enhance learner outcomes. The corresponding set of observable educator behaviours aim to describe how an educator could engage, motivate and enable a learner to improve. This creates the foundation for developing a method to systematically evaluate the impact of verbal feedback on learner performance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior

          Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +61 410 454 535 , christina.johnson@monashhealth.org
                Jenny.Keating@monash.edu
                David.Boud@uts.edu.au
                Megan.Dalton@cqu.edu.au
                Margaret.Hay@monash.edu
                Barry.Mcgrath@monash.edu
                Wendy.McKenzie@monash.edu
                Kichu.Nair@newcastle.edu.au
                Debra.Nestel@monash.edu
                Claire.Palermo@monash.edu
                Elizabeth.Molloy@monash.edu
                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                22 March 2016
                22 March 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 96
                Affiliations
                [ ]Health Professions Education and Educational Research (HealthPEER), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
                [ ]Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
                [ ]Centre for Research on Assessment and Digital Learning, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
                [ ]Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
                [ ]Institute of Work-Based Learning, Middlesex University, London, UK
                [ ]School of Human, Health and Social Science, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia
                [ ]Faculty of Health Science, Youth and Community Studies, Holmesglen Institute and Healthscope Hospitals, Holmesglen, Melbourne, Australia
                [ ]Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
                [ ]Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
                [ ]School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
                [ ]Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
                [ ]Monash Doctors Education, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia
                Article
                613
                10.1186/s12909-016-0613-5
                4802720
                27000623
                b5870786-e881-4c00-971c-3c5c799f0161
                © Johnson et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 7 September 2015
                : 9 March 2016
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Education
                feedback,clinical practice,delphi process,health professions education,educator behaviour

                Comments

                Comment on this article