1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “Ellos son los que matan sin razón”: la construcción del sentido de la palabra “violencia” en el “caso Catrillanca” Translated title: “They Are the Ones Who Kill with No Reason”: The Sense Construction of the Word “Violence” within the “Catrillanca Case”

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen La presente investigación tiene por objetivo analizar la construcción del sentido de la palabra “violencia”, a propósito de la cobertura mediática del “caso Catrillanca”, uno de los acontecimientos del conflicto chileno-mapuche que mayor conmoción ha causado en el último tiempo (Pinto, 2020). Para ello, se adopta el enfoque de la semántica discursiva y se consideran los planteamientos del Análisis del Discurso francés sobre la nominación de los acontecimientos en la prensa. La investigación asume una metodología cualitativa con un alcance descriptivo-interpretativo. El corpus se compone de 15 textos que conforman una muestra de un corpus mayor. Los textos fueron extraídos de la prensa tradicional (El Mercurio) y alternativa (El Mostrador y Mapuexpress). El análisis del corpus permite afirmar que el sentido de la palabra “violencia” se ‘actualiza’ (Détrie et al., 2017) de forma distinta en cada uno de los diarios. Estas actualizaciones se resumen en tres categorías semánticas: “violencia delictual”, “violencia del Estado” y “violencia estructural”. Sumado a ello, se observó que la palabra “violencia” se asocia a distintos actores sociales, no siempre identificables. Las diferencias entre un diario y otro podrían explicarse por la línea editorial de cada uno.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract The objective of this research is to analyze the sense of the word “violence” regarding the media coverage of the “Catrillanca case”, one of the biggest events of the Chilean-Mapuche conflict that has caused great commotion in recent times (Pinto, 2020). For this purpose, the discursive semantics perspective was adopted and the proposals of the French Discourse Analysis on the naming of events in the press were considered. This research employs a qualitative methodology of a descriptive-interpretative scope. The corpus is composed of fifteen texts, which constitute a sample from a larger corpus. The texts were extracted from traditional (El Mercurio) and alternative written press (El Mostrador and Mapuexpress). The analysis of the corpus allows us to affirm that the sense of the word "violence" is ‘updated’ (Détrie et al., 2017) in a different way in each newspaper. These updates are summarized in three semantic categories: “criminal violence,” “state violence”, and “structural violence”. In addition to this, it was observed that the word “violence” is associated with different social actors, not always recognizable. The differences between the editorial lines of each newspaper could explain this variation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Los Mapuche en la sociedad chilena actual

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Imaginarios sociales y representaciones: su aplicación a análisis discursivos en tres ámbitos diferentes

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Penser les mots, dire la migration

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                signos
                Revista signos
                Rev. signos
                Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Instituto de Literatura y Ciencias del Lenguaje (Valparaíso, , Chile )
                0718-0934
                December 2024
                : 57
                : 116
                : 733-756
                Affiliations
                [1] Bío-Bío orgnameUniversidad de Concepción Chile valenthenriquez@ 123456udec.cl
                [2] Bío-Bío orgnameUniversidad de Concepción Chile psegovia@ 123456udec.cl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-6356
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9164-5223
                Article
                S0718-09342024000300733 S0718-0934(24)05711600733
                10.4151/s0718-0934202401160962
                b539f2f1-4efa-4960-aeb5-970721490509

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 25 May 2022
                : 11 August 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 43, Pages: 24
                Product

                SciELO Chile

                Categories
                ARTÍCULOS

                semántica discursiva,discourse analysis,nomination,discursive semantics,Chilean-Mapuche conflict,violence,Catrillanca case,análisis del discurso,conflicto chileno-mapuche,violencia,caso Catrillanca

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content554

                Most referenced authors84