25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Association Between Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Overall Survival in Patients With Rectal Cancer and Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Resection

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi170102-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5546615e393">Question</h5> <p id="d5546615e395">Does adjuvant chemotherapy provide a survival benefit to patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who demonstrate a complete pathological response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and resection? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi170102-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5546615e398">Findings</h5> <p id="d5546615e400">In this propensity score–matched cohort study including 667 matched pairs of patients with rectal cancer and a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and resection, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated better 5-year overall survival than those who did not receive adjuvant treatment (95.0% vs 88.2%). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi170102-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5546615e403">Meaning</h5> <p id="d5546615e405">In this subgroup of patients with excellent prognosis, the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy may provide additional survival benefits; however, these benefits need to be weighed against the risks of chemotoxic effects. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi170102-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5546615e409">Importance</h5> <p id="d5546615e411">Although American guidelines recommend use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, individuals who achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are less likely to receive adjuvant treatment than incomplete responders. The association and resection of adjuvant chemotherapy with survival in patients with pCR is unclear. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi170102-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5546615e414">Objective</h5> <p id="d5546615e416">To determine whether patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieve pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and resection benefit from the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi170102-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5546615e419">Design, Setting, and Participants</h5> <p id="d5546615e421">This retrospective propensity score–matched cohort study identified patients with locally advanced rectal cancer from the National Cancer Database from 2006 through 2012. We selected patients with nonmetastatic invasive rectal cancer who achieved pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and resection. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi170102-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5546615e424">Exposures</h5> <p id="d5546615e426">We matched patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy to patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment in a 1:1 ratio. We separately matched subgroups of patients with node-positive disease before treatment and node-negative disease before treatment to investigate for effect modification by pretreatment nodal status. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi170102-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5546615e429">Main Outcome and Measures</h5> <p id="d5546615e431">We compared overall survival between groups using Kaplan-Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards models. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi170102-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5546615e434">Results</h5> <p id="d5546615e436">We identified 2455 patients (mean age, 59.5 years; 59.8% men) with rectal cancer with pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and resection. We matched 667 patients with pCR who received adjuvant chemotherapy and at least 8 weeks of follow-up after surgery to patients with pCR who did not receive adjuvant treatment. Over a median follow-up of 3.1 years (interquartile range, 1.94-4.40 years), patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated better overall survival than those who did not receive adjuvant treatment (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28-0.70). When stratified by pretreatment nodal status, only those patients with pretreatment node-positive disease exhibited improved overall survival with administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.58). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi170102-10"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5546615e439">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d5546615e441">The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer with pCR is associated with improved overall survival, particularly in patients with pretreatment node-positive disease. Although this study suggests a beneficial effect of adjuvant treatment on survival in patients with pCR, these results are limited by the presence of potential unmeasured confounding in this nonrandomized study. </p> </div><p class="first" id="d5546615e444">This propensity score–matched cohort study examines whether adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival in patients with rectal cancer and pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and resection. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer.

          Intravenous bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin is the standard adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. The oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine is an established alternative to bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. We evaluated capecitabine in the adjuvant setting. We randomly assigned a total of 1987 patients with resected stage III colon cancer to receive either oral capecitabine (1004 patients) or bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin (Mayo Clinic regimen; 983 patients) over a period of 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was at least equivalence in disease-free survival; the primary safety end point was the incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxic effects due to fluoropyrimidines. Disease-free survival in the capecitabine group was at least equivalent to that in the fluorouracil-plus-leucovorin group (in the intention-to-treat analysis, P<0.001 for the comparison of the upper limit of the hazard ratio with the noninferiority margin of 1.20). Capecitabine improved relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.99; P=0.04) and was associated with significantly fewer adverse events than fluorouracil plus leucovorin (P<0.001). Oral capecitabine is an effective alternative to intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Levamisole and fluorouracil for adjuvant therapy of resected colon carcinoma.

            Twelve hundred ninety-six patients with resected colon cancer that either was locally invasive (Stage B2) or had regional nodal involvement (Stage C) were randomly assigned to observation or to treatment for one year with levamisole combined with fluorouracil. Patients with Stage C disease could also be randomly assigned to treatment with levamisole alone. The median follow-up time at this writing is 3 years (range, 2 to 5 1/2). Among the patients with Stage C disease, therapy with levamisole plus fluorouracil reduced the risk of cancer recurrence by 41 percent (P less than 0.0001). The overall death rate was reduced by 33 percent (P approximately 0.006). Treatment with levamisole alone had no detectable effect. The results in the patients with Stage B2 disease were equivocal and too preliminary to allow firm conclusions. Toxic effects of levamisole alone were infrequent, usually consisting of mild nausea with occasional dermatitis or leukopenia, and those of levamisole plus fluorouracil were essentially the same as those of fluorouracil alone--i.e., nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, diarrhea, dermatitis, and leukopenia. These reactions were usually not severe and did not greatly impede patients' compliance with their regimen. We conclude that adjuvant therapy with levamisole and fluorouracil should be standard treatment for Stage C colon carcinoma. Since most patients in our study were treated by community oncologists, this approach should be readily adaptable to conventional medical practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial.

              Preoperative chemoradiotherapy, total mesorectal excision surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil is the standard combined modality treatment for rectal cancer. With the aim of improving disease-free survival (DFS), this phase 3 study (CAO/ARO/AIO-04) integrated oxaliplatin into standard treatment. This was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study in patients with histologically proven carcinoma of the rectum with clinically staged T3-4 or any node-positive disease. Between July 25, 2006, and Feb 26, 2010, patients were randomly assigned to two groups: a control group receiving standard fluorouracil-based combined modality treatment, consisting of preoperative radiotherapy of 50·4 Gy plus infusional fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2) days 1-5 and 29-33), followed by surgery and four cycles of bolus fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2) days 1-5 and 29; fluorouracil group); and an experimental group receiving preoperative radiotherapy of 50·4 Gy plus infusional fluorouracil (250 mg/m(2) days 1-14 and 22-35) and oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 22, and 29), followed by surgery and eight cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2) days 1 and 15), leucovorin (400 mg/m(2) days 1 and 15), and infusional fluorouracil (2400 mg/m(2) days 1-2 and 15-16; fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin group). Randomisation was done with computer-generated block-randomisation codes stratified by centre, clinical T category (cT1-4 vs cT4), and clinical N category (cN0 vs cN1-2) without masking. DFS is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints, including toxicity, compliance, and histopathological response are reported here. Safety and compliance analyses included patients as treated, efficacy endpoints were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00349076. Of the 1265 patients initially enrolled, 1236 were evaluable (613 in the fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin group and 623 in the fluorouracil group). Preoperative grade 3-4 toxic effects occurred in 140 (23%) of 606 patients who actually received fluorouracil and oxaliplatin during chemoradiotherapy and in 127 (20%) of 624 patients who actually received fluorouracil chemoradiotherapy. Grade 3-4 diarrhoea was more common in those who received fluorouracil and oxaliplatin during chemoradiotherapy than in those who received fluorouracil during chemoradiotherapy (73 patients [12%] vs 52 patients [8%]), as was grade 3-4 nausea or vomiting (23 [4%] vs nine [1%]). 516 (85%) of the 606 patients who received fluorouracil and oxaliplatin-based chemoradiotherapy had the full dose of chemotherapy, and 571 (94%) had the full dose of radiotherapy; as did 495 (79%) and 601 (96%) of 624 patients who received fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy, respectively. A pathological complete response was achieved in 103 (17%) of 591 patients who underwent surgery in the fluorouracil and oxaliplatin group and in 81 (13%) of 606 patients who underwent surgery in the fluorouracil group (odds ratio 1·40, 95% CI 1·02-1·92; p=0·038). In the fluorouracil and oxaliplatin group, 352 (81%) of 435 patients who began adjuvant chemotherapy completed all cycles (with or without dose reduction), as did 386 (83%) of 463 patients in the fluorouracil group. Inclusion of oxaliplatin into modified fluorouracil-based combined modality treatment was feasible and led to more patients achieving a pathological complete response than did standard treatment. Longer follow-up is needed to assess DFS. German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe). Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Oncology
                JAMA Oncol
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2374-2437
                July 01 2018
                July 01 2018
                : 4
                : 7
                : 930
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [3 ]Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ]Department of Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ]Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Centre, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston
                [6 ]Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston
                [7 ]Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Article
                10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5597
                6145724
                29710274
                b50ef70f-ee81-4057-bba9-2a619cb24547
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article