12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A self-management app to improve asthma control in adults with limited health literacy: a mixed-method feasibility study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Digital technology tailored for those with limited health literacy has the potential to reduce health inequalities. Although mobile apps can support self-management in chronic diseases, there is little evidence that this approach applies to people with limited health literacy. We aimed to determine the acceptability of a self-management app in adults living with asthma and have limited health literacy and the feasibility of delivering the intervention and assessing outcomes.

          Methods

          We recruited eligible adults from the Klang Asthma Cohort registry in primary care for a 3-month mixed-method study plus a 2-month extended observation. We collected baseline data on socio-demography, health literacy and asthma control level. The outcomes of the intervention were assessed at 1- and 3-month: i) adoption (app download and usage), ii) adherence (app usage), iii) retention (app usage in the observation period), iv) health outcomes (e.g., severe asthma attacks) and v) process outcomes (e.g., ownership and use of action plans). At 1-month, participants were purposively sampled for in-depth interviews, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed deductively.

          Results

          We recruited 48 participants; 35 participants (23 Female; median age = 43 years; median HLS score = 28) completed the 3 months study. Of these, 14 participants (10 Female; median age = 48 years; median HLS score = 28) provided interviews. Thirty-seven (77%) participants adopted the app (downloaded and used it in the first month of the study). The main factor reported as influencing adoption was the ease of using the app. A total of 950 app usage were captured during the 3-month feasibility study. App usage increased gradually, peaking at month 2 (355 total log-ins) accounting for 78% of users. In month 5, 51.4% of the participants used the app at least once. The main factors influencing continued use included adherence features (e.g., prompts and reminders), familiarity with app function and support from family members.

          Conclusions

          An asthma self-management app intervention was acceptable for adults with limited health literacy and it was feasible to collect the desired outcomes at different time points during the study. A future trial is warranted to estimate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the intervention and to explore implementation strategies.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-023-02300-6.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance

          The UK Medical Research Council’s widely used guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions has been replaced by a new framework, commissioned jointly by the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research, which takes account of recent developments in theory and methods and the need to maximise the efficiency, use, and impact of research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models

            Background Health literacy concerns the knowledge and competences of persons to meet the complex demands of health in modern society. Although its importance is increasingly recognised, there is no consensus about the definition of health literacy or about its conceptual dimensions, which limits the possibilities for measurement and comparison. The aim of the study is to review definitions and models on health literacy to develop an integrated definition and conceptual model capturing the most comprehensive evidence-based dimensions of health literacy. Methods A systematic literature review was performed to identify definitions and conceptual frameworks of health literacy. A content analysis of the definitions and conceptual frameworks was carried out to identify the central dimensions of health literacy and develop an integrated model. Results The review resulted in 17 definitions of health literacy and 12 conceptual models. Based on the content analysis, an integrative conceptual model was developed containing 12 dimensions referring to the knowledge, motivation and competencies of accessing, understanding, appraising and applying health-related information within the healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion setting, respectively. Conclusions Based upon this review, a model is proposed integrating medical and public health views of health literacy. The model can serve as a basis for developing health literacy enhancing interventions and provide a conceptual basis for the development and validation of measurement tools, capturing the different dimensions of health literacy within the healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.

              Approximately 80 million Americans have limited health literacy, which puts them at greater risk for poorer access to care and poorer health outcomes. To update a 2004 systematic review and determine whether low health literacy is related to poorer use of health care, outcomes, costs, and disparities in health outcomes among persons of all ages. English-language articles identified through MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Cochrane Library databases and hand-searching (search dates for articles on health literacy, 2003 to 22 February 2011; for articles on numeracy, 1966 to 22 February 2011). Two reviewers independently selected studies that compared outcomes by differences in directly measured health literacy or numeracy levels. One reviewer abstracted article information into evidence tables; a second reviewer checked information for accuracy. Two reviewers independently rated study quality by using predefined criteria, and the investigative team jointly graded the overall strength of evidence. 96 relevant good- or fair-quality studies in 111 articles were identified: 98 articles on health literacy, 22 on numeracy, and 9 on both. Low health literacy was consistently associated with more hospitalizations; greater use of emergency care; lower receipt of mammography screening and influenza vaccine; poorer ability to demonstrate taking medications appropriately; poorer ability to interpret labels and health messages; and, among elderly persons, poorer overall health status and higher mortality rates. Poor health literacy partially explains racial disparities in some outcomes. Reviewers could not reach firm conclusions about the relationship between numeracy and health outcomes because of few studies or inconsistent results among studies. Searches were limited to articles published in English. No Medical Subject Heading terms exist for identifying relevant studies. No evidence concerning oral health literacy (speaking and listening skills) and outcomes was found. Low health literacy is associated with poorer health outcomes and poorer use of health care services. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hanisyahida@upm.edu.my
                Journal
                BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
                BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
                BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6947
                27 September 2023
                27 September 2023
                2023
                : 23
                : 194
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, ( https://ror.org/02e91jd64) Serdang, Malaysia
                [2 ]Malaysian Research Institute On Ageing, Universiti Putra Malaysia, ( https://ror.org/02e91jd64) Serdang, Malaysia
                [3 ]UM eHealth Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, ( https://ror.org/00rzspn62) Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
                [4 ]Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, ( https://ror.org/02e91jd64) Serdang, Malaysia
                [5 ]Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, ( https://ror.org/00rzspn62) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                [6 ]GRID grid.415759.b, ISNI 0000 0001 0690 5255, Klinik Kesihatan Pandamaran, Ministry of Health Malaysia, ; Klang, Selangor Malaysia
                [7 ]GRID grid.415759.b, ISNI 0000 0001 0690 5255, Klinik Kesihatan Bandar Botanik, Ministry of Health Malaysia, ; Klang, Selangor Malaysia
                [8 ]NIHR Global Health Research Unit On Respiratory Health (RESPIRE), Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, ( https://ror.org/01nrxwf90) Edinburgh, UK
                Article
                2300
                10.1186/s12911-023-02300-6
                10523795
                37759184
                b4421673-fd83-4c7a-bb33-f18310858d17
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 5 October 2022
                : 18 September 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Health and Care Research, United Kingdom
                Award ID: 16/136/109
                Award ID: 16/136/109
                Award ID: 16/136/109
                Award ID: 16/136/109
                Award ID: 16/136/109
                Award ID: 16/136/109
                Award ID: 16/136/109
                Award ID: 16/136/109
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Bioinformatics & Computational biology
                mobile application,asthma,self-management,health literacy,feasibility study,low-and-middle-income countries (lmic)

                Comments

                Comment on this article