128
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The phylogenetic relationships of basal archosauromorphs, with an emphasis on the systematics of proterosuchian archosauriforms

      research-article
      PeerJ
      PeerJ Inc.
      Diapsida, Archosauromorpha, Permian, Cladistics, Archosauria, Phylogeny, Triassic, Macroevolution

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The early evolution of archosauromorphs during the Permo-Triassic constitutes an excellent empirical case study to shed light on evolutionary radiations in deep time and the timing and processes of recovery of terrestrial faunas after a mass extinction. However, macroevolutionary studies of early archosauromorphs are currently limited by poor knowledge of their phylogenetic relationships. In particular, one of the main early archosauromorph groups that need an exhaustive phylogenetic study is “Proterosuchia,” which as historically conceived includes members of both Proterosuchidae and Erythrosuchidae. A new data matrix composed of 96 separate taxa (several of them not included in a quantitative phylogenetic analysis before) and 600 osteological characters was assembled and analysed to generate a comprehensive higher-level phylogenetic hypothesis of basal archosauromorphs and shed light on the species-level interrelationships of taxa historically identified as proterosuchian archosauriforms. The results of the analysis using maximum parsimony include a polyphyletic “Prolacertiformes” and “Protorosauria,” in which the Permian Aenigmastropheus and Protorosaurus are the most basal archosauromorphs. The enigmatic choristoderans are either found as the sister-taxa of all other lepidosauromorphs or archosauromorphs, but consistently placed within Sauria. Prolacertids, rhynchosaurs, allokotosaurians and tanystropheids are the major successive sister clades of Archosauriformes. The Early Triassic Tasmaniosaurus is recovered as the sister-taxon of Archosauriformes. Proterosuchidae is unambiguosly restricted to five species that occur immediately after and before the Permo-Triassic boundary, thus implying that they are a short-lived “disaster” clade. Erythrosuchidae is composed of eight nominal species that occur during the Early and Middle Triassic. “Proterosuchia” is polyphyletic, in which erythrosuchids are more closely related to Euparkeria and more crownward archosauriforms than to proterosuchids, and several species are found widespread along the archosauromorph tree, some being nested within Archosauria (e.g., “ Chasmatosaurus ultimus,” Youngosuchus). Doswelliids and proterochampsids are recovered as more closely related to each other than to other archosauromorphs, forming a large clade (Proterochampsia) of semi-aquatic to aquatic forms that includes the bizarre genus Vancleavea. Euparkeria is one of the sister-taxa of the clade composed of proterochampsians and archosaurs. The putative Indian archosaur Yarasuchus is recovered in a polytomy with Euparkeria and more crownward archosauriforms, and as more closely related to the Russian Dongusuchus than to other species. Phytosaurs are recovered as the sister-taxa of all other pseudosuchians, thus being nested within Archosauria.

          Related collections

          Most cited references552

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          R: A Language and environmental for statistical computing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Limits of Amino Acid Sequence Data in Angiosperm Phylogenetic Reconstruction

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The evolution of dinosaurs.

              The ascendancy of dinosaurs on land near the close of the Triassic now appears to have been as accidental and opportunistic as their demise and replacement by therian mammals at the end of the Cretaceous. The dinosaurian radiation, launched by 1-meter-long bipeds, was slower in tempo and more restricted in adaptive scope than that of therian mammals. A notable exception was the evolution of birds from small-bodied predatory dinosaurs, which involved a dramatic decrease in body size. Recurring phylogenetic trends among dinosaurs include, to the contrary, increase in body size. There is no evidence for co-evolution between predators and prey or between herbivores and flowering plants. As the major land masses drifted apart, dinosaurian biogeography was molded more by regional extinction and intercontinental dispersal than by the breakup sequence of Pangaea.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Francisco, USA )
                2167-8359
                28 April 2016
                2016
                : 4
                : e1778
                Affiliations
                [-1]School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, United Kingdom
                [-2]Sección Paleontología de Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales , Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [-3]GeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München , Munich, Germany
                Article
                1778
                10.7717/peerj.1778
                4860341
                27162705
                b3e9b714-8c8d-459d-9083-70fecbf9e356
                ©2016 Ezcurra

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 1 December 2015
                : 18 February 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: Emmy Noether Programme of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
                Award ID: BU 2587/3-1
                Funded by: College of Life and Environmental Sciences (University of Birmingham)
                Funded by: Marie Curie Career Integration Grant
                Award ID: PCIG14-GA-2013-630123
                Funded by: National Geographic Young Explorers Grant
                Award ID: #9467-14
                Funded by: Synthesis Program
                Funded by: Doris and Samuel P. Welles Fund
                Funded by: Jurassic Foundation
                Funded by: Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
                This research was primarily supported by the Emmy Noether Programme of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BU 2587/3-1 to Richard Butler), with additional support from the College of Life and Environmental Sciences (University of Birmingham), a Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (PCIG14-GA-2013-630123 to Richard Butler), and a National Geographic Young Explorers Grant (#9467-14). The Synthesis Program funded his visit to the collection of vertebrate palaeontology of the Museum national d’Historie Neturelle in Paris, and the Doris and Samuel P. Welles Fund funded his visit to the University of California, Museum of Paleontology in Berkeley. Grants from the Jurassic Foundation and the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (Jackson School of Geosciences Student Member Travel Grant) also contributed to this research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Evolutionary Studies
                Paleontology
                Taxonomy
                Zoology

                diapsida,archosauromorpha,permian,cladistics,archosauria,phylogeny,triassic,macroevolution

                Comments

                Comment on this article