4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Caries in populations - a theoretical, causal approach : Caries in populations

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sick individuals and sick populations.

          Aetiology confronts two distinct issues: the determinants of individual cases, and the determinants of incidence rate. If exposure to a necessary agent is homogeneous within a population, then case/control and cohort methods will fail to detect it: they will only identify markers of susceptibility. The corresponding strategies in control are the 'high-risk' approach, which seeks to protect susceptible individuals, and the population approach, which seeks to control the causes of incidence. The two approaches are not usually in competition, but the prior concern should always be to discover and control the causes of incidence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: a hierarchical approach.

            This paper discusses appropriate strategies for multivariate data analysis in epidemiological studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Choosing a future for epidemiology: I. Eras and paradigms.

              To inform choices about the future of epidemiology, the present condition of epidemiology is examined, in terms of its evolution through three eras, each demarcated by its own paradigm: (1) the era of sanitary statistics with its paradigm, miasma; (2) the era of infectious disease epidemiology with its paradigm, the germ theory; and (3) the era of chronic disease epidemiology with its paradigm, the black box. The historical context in which these eras arose is briefly described. In each era, the public health was at the center of the concerns of the founders and early protagonists of the prevailing paradigm. Around this intellectual development we weave a further theme. We argue that in the present era, the public health has become less central a concern. At the same time, in epidemiology today the dominant black box paradigm is of declining utility and is likely soon to be superseded.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EOS
                European Journal of Oral Sciences
                Wiley
                09098836
                June 2001
                June 2001
                December 21 2001
                : 109
                : 3
                : 143-148
                Article
                10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00022.x
                b27ba197-b19c-4be7-8bd5-f0f3560596b0
                © 2001

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article