30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Diagnostic point-of-care tests in resource-limited settings.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of diagnostic point-of-care testing is to minimise the time to obtain a test result, thereby allowing clinicians and patients to make a quick clinical decision. Because point-of-care tests are used in resource-limited settings, the benefits need to outweigh the costs. To optimise point-of-care testing in resource-limited settings, diagnostic tests need rigorous assessments focused on relevant clinical outcomes and operational costs, which differ from assessments of conventional diagnostic tests. We reviewed published studies on point-of-care testing in resource-limited settings, and found no clearly defined metric for the clinical usefulness of point-of-care testing. Therefore, we propose a framework for the assessment of point-of-care tests, and suggest and define the term test efficacy to describe the ability of a diagnostic test to support a clinical decision within its operational context. We also propose revised criteria for an ideal diagnostic point-of-care test in resource-limited settings. Through systematic assessments, comparisons between centralised testing and novel point-of-care technologies can be more formalised, and health officials can better establish which point-of-care technologies represent valuable additions to their clinical programmes.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Lancet Infect Dis
          The Lancet. Infectious diseases
          Elsevier BV
          1474-4457
          1473-3099
          Mar 2014
          : 14
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. Electronic address: pdrain@partners.org.
          [2 ] Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
          [3 ] Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; The Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, USA.
          [4 ] Edendale Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
          [5 ] Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA; KwaZulu-Natal Research Institute for Tuberculosis and HIV, Durban, South Africa.
          [6 ] Daktari Diagnostics, Boston, MA, USA.
          Article
          S1473-3099(13)70250-0 NIHMS571808
          10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70250-0
          4016042
          24332389
          b2494826-8250-411c-ad65-d617bff7049d
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article