10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      False Belief Development in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing Compared With Peers With Normal Hearing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d10337925e168"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d10337925e169">Purpose</h5> <p id="d10337925e171">This study investigates false belief (FB) understanding in children who are hard of hearing (CHH) compared with children with normal hearing (CNH) at ages 5 and 6 years and at 2nd grade. Research with this population has theoretical significance, given that the early auditory–linguistic experiences of CHH are less restricted compared with children who are deaf but not as complete as those of CNH. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d10337925e173"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d10337925e174">Method</h5> <p id="d10337925e176">Participants included CHH and CNH who had completed FB tasks as part of a larger multicenter, longitudinal study on outcomes of children with mild-to-severe hearing loss. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal data were analyzed. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d10337925e178"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d10337925e179">Results</h5> <p id="d10337925e181">At age 5 years, CHH demonstrated significant delays in FB understanding relative to CNH. Both hearing status and spoken-language abilities contributed to FB performance in 5-year-olds. A subgroup of CHH showed protracted delays at 6 years, suggesting that some CHH are at risk for longer term delays in FB understanding. By 2nd grade, performance on 1st- and 2nd-order FBs did not differ between CHH and CNH. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d10337925e183"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d10337925e184">Conclusions</h5> <p id="d10337925e186">Preschool-age CHH are at risk for delays in understanding others' beliefs, which has consequences for their social interactions and pragmatic communication. Research related to FB in children with hearing loss has the potential to inform our understanding of mechanisms that support social–cognitive development, including the roles of language and conversational access. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer-infant interaction.

          In a longitudinal study, infants 6-18 months of age were observed in their homes playing with their mothers and with peers. Of primary concern was how they coordinated their attention to people and objects. Observations were coded using a state-based scheme that included a state of coordinated joint engagement as well as states of person engagement, object engagement, onlooking, and passive joint engagement. All developmental trends observed were similar regardless of partner: person engagement declined with age, while coordinated joint engagement increased. Passive joint engagement, object engagement, and onlooking did not change with age. However, the absolute amount of some engagement states was affected by partner: both passive and coordinated joint engagement were much more likely when infants played with mothers. We conclude that mothers may indeed support or "scaffold" their infants' early attempts to embed objects in social interaction, but that as attentional capabilities develop even quite unskilled peers may be appropriate partners for the exercise of these capacities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            “John thinks that Mary thinks that…” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Attention, Joint Attention, and Social Cognition.

              Before social cognition there is joint processing of information about the attention of self and others. This joint attention requires the integrated activation of a distributed cortical network involving the anterior and posterior attention systems. In infancy, practice with the integrated activation of this distributed attention network is a major contributor to the development of social cognition. Thus, the functional neuroanatomies of social cognition and the anterior-posterior attention systems have much in common. These propositions have implications for understanding joint attention, social cognition, and autism.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
                J Speech Lang Hear Res
                American Speech Language Hearing Association
                1092-4388
                1558-9102
                December 20 2017
                December 20 2017
                : 60
                : 12
                : 3487-3506
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The University of Iowa, Iowa City
                [2 ]Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE
                Article
                10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0121
                5962924
                29209697
                b1d5edde-ee11-4b64-abe6-bf7f2108c19e
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article