28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of C-Peptide Preservation on Metabolic and Clinical Outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group *
      Diabetes
      American Diabetes Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial established that a stimulated C-peptide concentration ≥0.2 nmol/L at study entry among subjects with up to a 5-year diabetes duration is associated with favorable metabolic and clinical outcomes over the subsequent 7 years of follow-up. Herein we further examine the association of both fasting and stimulated C-peptide numerical values with outcomes. In the intensive treatment group, for a 50% higher stimulated C-peptide on entry, such as from 0.10 to 0.15 nmol/L, HbA 1c decreased by 0.07% (0.8 mmol/mol; P = 0.0003), insulin dose decreased by 0.0276 units/kg/day ( P < 0.0001), hypoglycemia risk decreased by 8.2% ( P < 0.0001), and the risk of sustained retinopathy was reduced by 25% ( P = 0.0010), all in unadjusted analyses. Other than HbA 1c, these effects remained significant after adjusting for the HbA 1c on entry. While C-peptide was not significantly associated with the incidence of nephropathy, it was strongly associated with the albumin excretion rate. The fasting C-peptide had weaker associations with outcomes. As C-peptide decreased to nonmeasurable concentrations, the outcomes changed in a nearly linear manner, with no threshold or breakpoint. While preservation of stimulated C-peptide at ≥0.2 nmol/L has clinically beneficial outcomes, so also does an increase in the concentration of C-peptide across the range of values.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Beta-cell function and the development of diabetes-related complications in the diabetes control and complications trial.

          In patients with type 1 diabetes, measurement of connecting peptide (C-peptide), cosecreted with insulin from the islets of Langerhans, permits estimation of remaining beta-cell secretion of insulin. In this retrospective analysis to distinguish the incremental benefits of residual beta-cell activity in type 1 diabetes, stimulated (90 min following ingestion of a mixed meal) C-peptide levels at entry in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) were related to measures of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy and to incidents of severe hypoglycemia. Based on the analytical sensitivity of the assay (0.03 nmol/l) and study entry criteria, the DCCT subjects were divided into four groups of stimulated C-peptide responses: 40 mg/24 h once and repeated at the next annual visit). There were also differences in severe hypoglycemia across C-peptide levels in both treatment groups. In the intensively treated cohort there were essentially identical prevalences of severe hypoglycemia ( approximately 65% of participants) in the first three groups; however, those subjects with mixed-meal stimulated C-peptide level >0.20 nmol/l for at least baseline and the first annual visit in the DCCT experienced a reduced prevalence of approximately 30%. Therefore, even modest levels of beta-cell activity at entry in the DCCT were associated with reduced incidences of retinopathy and nephropathy. Also, continuing C-peptide (insulin) secretion is important in avoiding hypoglycemia (the major complication of intensive diabetic therapy).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of intensive therapy on residual beta-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes in the diabetes control and complications trial. A randomized, controlled trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group.

            DS Group (1998)
            Although insulin secretion is severely decreased in most patients with type 1 diabetes, levels of residual insulin secretion often vary early in the disease. The significance of residual insulin secretion with regard to metabolic control and to long-term complications and ways to preserve such secretion are not well understood. To compare the effects of intensive and conventional therapy on residual insulin secretion in Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) participants. Multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. 29 DCCT clinical centers. 855 of the 1441 DCCT participants had had type 1 diabetes for 1 to 5 years at baseline. Of these 855 patients, 303 were C-peptide responders (C-peptide level, 0.20 to 0.50 pmol/mL after ingestion of a standardized, mixed meal); 138 of these patients were randomly assigned to intensive therapy, and 165 were assigned to conventional therapy. Five hundred fifty-two patients were nonresponders (stimulated C-peptide level < 0.2 pmol/mL); 274 of these patients were assigned to intensive therapy, and 278 were assigned to conventional therapy. 1) Intensive therapy with 3 or more insulin injections daily or continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin, guided by 4 or more glucose tests per day or 2) conventional therapy with 1 or 2 insulin injections daily. Stimulated C-peptide level was measured annually in responders. Development of retinopathy and microalbuminuria was assessed annually, hemoglobin A1c levels were measured quarterly, and episodes of hypoglycemia were ascertained quarterly. Responders receiving intensive therapy maintained a higher stimulated C-peptide level and a lower likelihood of becoming nonresponders than did responders receiving conventional therapy (risk reduction, 57% [95% CI, 39% to 71%]; P < 0.001). As in the entire DCCT cohort, intensively treated responders had a reduced risk for retinopathy progression and development of microalbuminuria and a higher risk for severe hypoglycemia compared with conventionally treated responders. Among intensively treated patients, responders had a lower hemoglobin A1c value (P < 0.01), a 50% (95% CI, 12% to 72%) reduced risk for retinopathy progression, and a lower risk for severe hypoglycemia (risk reduction, 65% [CI, 53% to 74%]; P < 0.001) compared with nonresponders. Intensive therapy for type 1 diabetes helps sustain endogenous insulin secretion, which, in turn, is associated with better metabolic control and lower risk for hypoglycemia and chronic complications. These observations underscore the importance of initiating intensive diabetic management as early as safely possible after type 1 diabetes is diagnosed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on nerve conduction in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.

              The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial demonstrated that intensive diabetes therapy effectively delays the onset of clinically apparent neuropathy in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A total of 1,441 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were randomly assigned to receive intensive treatment or conventional treatment. Of these, 1,290 were randomized at least 4 1/2 years or more prior to study termination. Nerve conduction studies were performed at baseline and repeated after approximately 5 years for 1,243 of these patients, 96% of the eligible population. After 5 years of treatment, significant nerve conduction differences were observed between the intensive and conventional treatment groups, all favoring better performance (faster sensory and motor conduction velocities and shorter F-wave latencies) in the intensive treatment group. Moreover, while performance generally deteriorated among the conventionally treated patients, most attributes remained stable or showed modest improvement in the intensively treated group. Treatment group differences were consistent across strata defined by duration of diabetes and the presence of neuropathy at baseline. A nonparametric multivariate test of all ten nerve conduction measures established a strong effect in favor of intensive treatment. These data confirm that the electrophysiological abnormalities associated with diabetic neuropathy are delayed or prevented by intensive diabetes treatment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diabetes
                Diabetes
                diabetes
                diabetes
                Diabetes
                Diabetes
                American Diabetes Association
                0012-1797
                1939-327X
                February 2014
                16 January 2014
                : 63
                : 2
                : 739-748
                Affiliations
                [1] 1The Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD
                [2] 2Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
                [3] 3Department of Medicine, DVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: John M. Lachin, jml@ 123456bsc.gwu.edu .
                Article
                0881
                10.2337/db13-0881
                3900540
                24089509
                b1bbfb4a-3f21-45ca-a3f7-6606b8efb8c6
                © 2014 by the American Diabetes Association.

                Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

                History
                : 05 June 2013
                : 20 September 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Categories
                Complications

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content111

                Cited by110

                Most referenced authors513