18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Delivery of cytoplasmic and apoplastic effectors from Phytophthora infestans haustoria by distinct secretion pathways

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          • The potato blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans secretes effector proteins that are delivered inside (cytoplasmic) or can act outside (apoplastic) plant cells to neutralize host immunity. Little is known about how and where effectors are secreted during infection, yet such knowledge is essential to understand and combat crop disease.

          • We used transient Agrobacterium tumefaciens‐mediated in planta expression, transformation of P. infestans with fluorescent protein fusions and confocal microscopy to investigate delivery of effectors to plant cells during infection.

          • The cytoplasmic effector Pi04314, expressed as a monomeric red fluorescent protein ( mRFP) fusion protein with a signal peptide to secrete it from plant cells, did not passively re‐enter the cells upon secretion. However, Pi04314‐ mRFP expressed in P. infestans was translocated from haustoria, which form intimate interactions with plant cells, to accumulate at its sites of action in the host nucleus. The well‐characterized apoplastic effector EPIC1, a cysteine protease inhibitor, was also secreted from haustoria. EPIC1 secretion was inhibited by brefeldin A ( BFA), demonstrating that it is delivered by conventional Golgi‐mediated secretion. By contrast, Pi04314 secretion was insensitive to BFA treatment, indicating that the cytoplasmic effector follows an alternative route for delivery into plant cells.

          • Phytophthora infestans haustoria are thus sites for delivery of both apoplastic and cytoplasmic effectors during infection, following distinct secretion pathways.

          Abstract

          See also the Commentary on this article by Van den Ackerveken, 216: 8–10 .

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A translocation signal for delivery of oomycete effector proteins into host plant cells.

          Bacterial, oomycete and fungal plant pathogens establish disease by translocation of effector proteins into host cells, where they may directly manipulate host innate immunity. In bacteria, translocation is through the type III secretion system, but analogous processes for effector delivery are uncharacterized in fungi and oomycetes. Here we report functional analyses of two motifs, RXLR and EER, present in translocated oomycete effectors. We use the Phytophthora infestans RXLR-EER-containing protein Avr3a as a reporter for translocation because it triggers RXLR-EER-independent hypersensitive cell death following recognition within plant cells that contain the R3a resistance protein. We show that Avr3a, with or without RXLR-EER motifs, is secreted from P. infestans biotrophic structures called haustoria, demonstrating that these motifs are not required for targeting to haustoria or for secretion. However, following replacement of Avr3a RXLR-EER motifs with alanine residues, singly or in combination, or with residues KMIK-DDK--representing a change that conserves physicochemical properties of the protein--P. infestans fails to deliver Avr3a or an Avr3a-GUS fusion protein into plant cells, demonstrating that these motifs are required for translocation. We show that RXLR-EER-encoding genes are transcriptionally upregulated during infection. Bioinformatic analysis identifies 425 potential genes encoding secreted RXLR-EER class proteins in the P. infestans genome. Identification of this class of proteins provides unparalleled opportunities to determine how oomycetes manipulate hosts to establish infection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Direct interaction of resistance gene and avirulence gene products confers rice blast resistance.

            Rice expressing the Pi-ta gene is resistant to strains of the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe grisea, expressing AVR-Pita in a gene-for-gene relationship. Pi-ta encodes a putative cytoplasmic receptor with a centrally localized nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich domain (LRD) at the C-terminus. AVR-Pita is predicted to encode a metalloprotease with an N-terminal secretory signal and pro-protein sequences. AVR-Pita(176) lacks the secretory and pro-protein sequences. We report here that transient expression of AVR-Pita(176) inside plant cells results in a Pi-ta-dependent resistance response. AVR-Pita(176) protein is shown to bind specifically to the LRD of the Pi-ta protein, both in the yeast two-hybrid system and in an in vitro binding assay. Single amino acid substitutions in the Pi-ta LRD or in the AVR-Pita(176) protease motif that result in loss of resistance in the plant also disrupt the physical interaction, both in yeast and in vitro. These data suggest that the AVR-Pita(176) protein binds directly to the Pi-ta LRD region inside the plant cell to initiate a Pi-ta-mediated defense response.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Translocation of Magnaporthe oryzae effectors into rice cells and their subsequent cell-to-cell movement.

              Knowledge remains limited about how fungal pathogens that colonize living plant cells translocate effector proteins inside host cells to regulate cellular processes and neutralize defense responses. To cause the globally important rice blast disease, specialized invasive hyphae (IH) invade successive living rice (Oryza sativa) cells while enclosed in host-derived extrainvasive hyphal membrane. Using live-cell imaging, we identified a highly localized structure, the biotrophic interfacial complex (BIC), which accumulates fluorescently labeled effectors secreted by IH. In each newly entered rice cell, effectors were first secreted into BICs at the tips of the initially filamentous hyphae in the cell. These tip BICs were left behind beside the first-differentiated bulbous IH cells as the fungus continued to colonize the host cell. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments showed that the effector protein PWL2 (for prevents pathogenicity toward weeping lovegrass [Eragrostis curvula]) continued to accumulate in BICs after IH were growing elsewhere. PWL2 and BAS1 (for biotrophy-associated secreted protein 1), BIC-localized secreted proteins, were translocated into the rice cytoplasm. By contrast, BAS4, which uniformly outlines the IH, was not translocated into the host cytoplasm. Fluorescent PWL2 and BAS1 proteins that reached the rice cytoplasm moved into uninvaded neighbors, presumably preparing host cells before invasion. We report robust assays for elucidating the molecular mechanisms that underpin effector secretion into BICs, translocation to the rice cytoplasm, and cell-to-cell movement in rice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Paul.Birch@hutton.ac.uk
                Journal
                New Phytol
                New Phytol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1469-8137
                NPH
                The New Phytologist
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0028-646X
                1469-8137
                31 July 2017
                October 2017
                : 216
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/nph.2017.216.issue-1 )
                : 205-215
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Plant Sciences University of Dundee (at JHI) Errol Road Invergowrie Dundee DD2 5DA UK
                [ 2 ] Cell and Molecular Sciences James Hutton Institute Errol Road Invergowrie Dundee DD2 5DA UK
                [ 3 ] Potato Engineering and Technology Research Centre of Inner Mongolia University West College Road 235 Hohhot 010021 China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Author for correspondence:

                Paul R. J. Birch

                Tel: +44 01382 568830

                Email: Paul.Birch@ 123456hutton.ac.uk

                Article
                NPH14696 2017-23646
                10.1111/nph.14696
                5601276
                28758684
                b0d0492d-dec9-4bf4-8b8e-90e09d2f93d7
                © 2017 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2017 New Phytologist Trust

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 January 2017
                : 05 June 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 0, Pages: 11, Words: 7420
                Funding
                Funded by: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
                Award ID: BB/G015244/1
                Award ID: BB/K018183/1
                Award ID: BB/L026880/1
                Funded by: Scottish Government Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS)
                Funded by: China Scholarship Council (CSC)
                Categories
                Full Paper
                Research
                Full Papers
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                nph14696
                October 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.1.9 mode:remove_FC converted:18.09.2017

                Plant science & Botany
                apoplastic effector,effector translocation,effector‐triggered susceptibility,plant disease,plant immunity,secretion,virulence

                Comments

                Comment on this article