29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In 2009 the first European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guideline for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was launched. Since then newer tests for diagnosing CDI have become available, especially nucleic acid amplification tests. The main objectives of this update of the guidance document are to summarize the currently available evidence concerning laboratory diagnosis of CDI and to formulate and revise recommendations to optimize CDI testing. This update is essential to improve the diagnosis of CDI and to improve uniformity in CDI diagnosis for surveillance purposes among Europe. An electronic search for literature concerning the laboratory diagnosis of CDI was performed. Studies evaluating a commercial laboratory test compared to a reference test were also included in a meta-analysis. The commercial tests that were evaluated included enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) detecting glutamate dehydrogenase, EIAs detecting toxins A and B and nucleic acid amplification tests. Recommendations were formulated by an executive committee, and the strength of recommendations and quality of evidence were graded using the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. No single commercial test can be used as a stand-alone test for diagnosing CDI as a result of inadequate positive predictive values at low CDI prevalence. Therefore, the use of a two-step algorithm is recommended. Samples without free toxin detected by toxins A and B EIA but with positive glutamate dehydrogenase EIA, nucleic acid amplification test or toxigenic culture results need clinical evaluation to discern CDI from asymptomatic carriage.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clin. Microbiol. Infect.
          Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
          Elsevier BV
          1469-0691
          1198-743X
          Aug 2016
          : 22 Suppl 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Medical Microbiology, Centre for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
          [2 ] Department of Medical Microbiology, St. George's Hospital, London, UK.
          [3 ] National Reference Laboratory for Clostridium difficile, Paris, France.
          [4 ] Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
          [5 ] Department of Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals & University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
          [6 ] Department of Medical Microbiology, Centre for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: E.J.Kuijper@lumc.nl.
          Article
          S1198-743X(16)30025-8
          10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.010
          27460910
          adec3240-458b-4481-8509-0a1d2c447bc2
          History

          Clostridium difficile infection,diagnosis,guideline,recommendations,review

          Comments

          Comment on this article