28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Future Global Meteorological Drought Hot Spots: A Study Based on CORDEX Data

      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 1 , 1 , 14 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 10 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 12 , 28 , 1 , 15 , 11 , 1
      Journal of Climate
      American Meteorological Society

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Two questions motivated this study: 1) Will meteorological droughts become more frequent and severe during the twenty-first century? 2) Given the projected global temperature rise, to what extent does the inclusion of temperature (in addition to precipitation) in drought indicators play a role in future meteorological droughts? To answer, we analyzed the changes in drought frequency, severity, and historically undocumented extreme droughts over 1981–2100, using the standardized precipitation index (SPI; including precipitation only) and standardized precipitation-evapotranspiration index (SPEI; indirectly including temperature), and under two representative concentration pathways (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). As input data, we employed 103 high-resolution (0.44°) simulations from the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX), based on a combination of 16 global circulation models (GCMs) and 20 regional circulation models (RCMs). This is the first study on global drought projections including RCMs based on such a large ensemble of RCMs. Based on precipitation only, ~15% of the global land is likely to experience more frequent and severe droughts during 2071–2100 versus 1981–2010 for both scenarios. This increase is larger (~47% under RCP4.5, ~49% under RCP8.5) when precipitation and temperature are used. Both SPI and SPEI project more frequent and severe droughts, especially under RCP8.5, over southern South America, the Mediterranean region, southern Africa, southeastern China, Japan, and southern Australia. A decrease in drought is projected for high latitudes in Northern Hemisphere and Southeast Asia. If temperature is included, drought characteristics are projected to increase over North America, Amazonia, central Europe and Asia, the Horn of Africa, India, and central Australia; if only precipitation is considered, they are found to decrease over those areas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references116

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design

          The fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) will produce a state-of-the- art multimodel dataset designed to advance our knowledge of climate variability and climate change. Researchers worldwide are analyzing the model output and will produce results likely to underlie the forthcoming Fifth Assessment Report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Unprecedented in scale and attracting interest from all major climate modeling groups, CMIP5 includes “long term” simulations of twentieth-century climate and projections for the twenty-first century and beyond. Conventional atmosphere–ocean global climate models and Earth system models of intermediate complexity are for the first time being joined by more recently developed Earth system models under an experiment design that allows both types of models to be compared to observations on an equal footing. Besides the longterm experiments, CMIP5 calls for an entirely new suite of “near term” simulations focusing on recent decades and the future to year 2035. These “decadal predictions” are initialized based on observations and will be used to explore the predictability of climate and to assess the forecast system's predictive skill. The CMIP5 experiment design also allows for participation of stand-alone atmospheric models and includes a variety of idealized experiments that will improve understanding of the range of model responses found in the more complex and realistic simulations. An exceptionally comprehensive set of model output is being collected and made freely available to researchers through an integrated but distributed data archive. For researchers unfamiliar with climate models, the limitations of the models and experiment design are described.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Little change in global drought over the past 60 years.

              Drought is expected to increase in frequency and severity in the future as a result of climate change, mainly as a consequence of decreases in regional precipitation but also because of increasing evaporation driven by global warming. Previous assessments of historic changes in drought over the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries indicate that this may already be happening globally. In particular, calculations of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) show a decrease in moisture globally since the 1970s with a commensurate increase in the area in drought that is attributed, in part, to global warming. The simplicity of the PDSI, which is calculated from a simple water-balance model forced by monthly precipitation and temperature data, makes it an attractive tool in large-scale drought assessments, but may give biased results in the context of climate change. Here we show that the previously reported increase in global drought is overestimated because the PDSI uses a simplified model of potential evaporation that responds only to changes in temperature and thus responds incorrectly to global warming in recent decades. More realistic calculations, based on the underlying physical principles that take into account changes in available energy, humidity and wind speed, suggest that there has been little change in drought over the past 60 years. The results have implications for how we interpret the impact of global warming on the hydrological cycle and its extremes, and may help to explain why palaeoclimate drought reconstructions based on tree-ring data diverge from the PDSI-based drought record in recent years.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Climate
                J. Climate
                American Meteorological Society
                0894-8755
                1520-0442
                May 2020
                May 2020
                : 33
                : 9
                : 3635-3661
                Affiliations
                [1 ] European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy
                [2 ] Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici, Lecce, Italy
                [3 ] Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, and Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado
                [4 ] Centro de Investigacion Cientifica y de Educacion Superior de Ensenada, Ensenada, Mexico
                [5 ] Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [6 ] Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [7 ] Norwegian Research Centre AS (NORCE), Bergen, Norway
                [8 ] Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy
                [9 ] Faculty of Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [10 ] Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Institute of Coastal Research, Hamburg, Germany
                [11 ] Energy, Environment and Water Research Center, Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
                [12 ] Climate Service Center Germany, Hamburg, Germany
                [13 ] Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Marine and Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia
                [14 ] Rossby Centre, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrkoping, Sweden
                [15 ] Département des Sciences de la Terre et de l’Atmosphère, University du Quebec à Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [16 ] Climate System Analysis Group, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
                [17 ] Department of Physics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
                [18 ] Center for Climate Change and Policy Studies, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
                [19 ] Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Qingdao, China
                [20 ] Sao Paulo State University and Bauru Meteorological Centre (IPMet/UNESP), Bauru, Sao Paulo, Brazil
                [21 ] Department of Physics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Isik University, Istanbul, Turkey
                [22 ] Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
                [23 ] Departimento de Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
                [24 ] Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Ciencias de la Atmósfera y los Océanos, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [25 ] Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [26 ] Global Change Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
                [27 ] Department of Earth Sciences and Environment, The National University of Malaysia (UKM), Selangor, Malaysia
                [28 ] National Centre for Scientific Research, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environment, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
                Article
                10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0084.1
                ada87c0e-70f8-4316-b0a2-6c9380d88889
                © 2020

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article