11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interpopulation Variation in the Atlantic Salmon Microbiome Reflects Environmental and Genetic Diversity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Variation in the microbiome has a fundamental influence on host health, ecology, and evolution, but the scope and basis of this variation are not fully understood. We identified considerable variation in skin and gut microbial communities between seven wild and captive populations of Atlantic salmon, reflecting divergent environmental conditions and fish genetic diversity. In particular, we found very pronounced differences in the intestinal microbiomes of wild and hatchery-reared fish, likely reflecting differences in diet. Our results offer an insight into how the microbiome potentially contributes to the generation of local adaptations in this species and how domestication alters intestinal microbial communities, highlighting future research directions in these areas.

          ABSTRACT

          The microbiome has a crucial influence on host phenotype and is of broad interest to ecological and evolutionary research. Yet, the extent of variation that occurs in the microbiome within and between populations is unclear. We characterized the skin and gut microbiomes of seven populations of juvenile Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar) inhabiting a diverse range of environments, including hatchery-reared and wild populations. We found shared skin operational taxonomic units (OTUs) across all populations and core gut microbiota for all wild fish, but the diversity and structure of both skin and gut microbial communities were distinct between populations. There was a marked difference between the gut microbiomes of wild and captive fish. Hatchery-reared fish had lower intestinal microbial diversity, lacked core microbiota found in wild fish, and showed altered community structure and function. Skin and gut microbiomes were also less varied within captive populations, reflecting more uniform artificial rearing conditions. The surrounding water influenced the microbiome of the gut and, especially, the skin, but could not explain the degree of variation observed between populations. For both gut and skin, we found that there was greater difference in microbiome structures between more genetically distinct fish populations, and that population genetic diversity was positively correlated with microbiome diversity. However, diet is likely to be the major factor contributing to the large differences in gut microbiota between wild and captive fish. Our results highlight the scope of interpopulation variation in the Atlantic salmon microbiome and offer insights into the deterministic factors contributing to microbiome diversity and structure.

          IMPORTANCE Variation in the microbiome has a fundamental influence on host health, ecology, and evolution, but the scope and basis of this variation are not fully understood. We identified considerable variation in skin and gut microbial communities between seven wild and captive populations of Atlantic salmon, reflecting divergent environmental conditions and fish genetic diversity. In particular, we found very pronounced differences in the intestinal microbiomes of wild and hatchery-reared fish, likely reflecting differences in diet. Our results offer an insight into how the microbiome potentially contributes to the generation of local adaptations in this species and how domestication alters intestinal microbial communities, highlighting future research directions in these areas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evidence for a core gut microbiota in the zebrafish.

          Experimental analysis of gut microbial communities and their interactions with vertebrate hosts is conducted predominantly in domesticated animals that have been maintained in laboratory facilities for many generations. These animal models are useful for studying coevolved relationships between host and microbiota only if the microbial communities that occur in animals in lab facilities are representative of those that occur in nature. We performed 16S rRNA gene sequence-based comparisons of gut bacterial communities in zebrafish collected recently from their natural habitat and those reared for generations in lab facilities in different geographic locations. Patterns of gut microbiota structure in domesticated zebrafish varied across different lab facilities in correlation with historical connections between those facilities. However, gut microbiota membership in domesticated and recently caught zebrafish was strikingly similar, with a shared core gut microbiota. The zebrafish intestinal habitat therefore selects for specific bacterial taxa despite radical differences in host provenance and domestication status.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Wild Mouse Gut Microbiota Promotes Host Fitness and Improves Disease Resistance

            Laboratory mice, while paramount for understanding basic biological phenomena, are limited in modeling complex diseases of humans and other free-living mammals. Because the microbiome is a major factor in mammalian physiology, we aimed to identify a naturally evolved reference microbiome to better recapitulate physiological phenomena relevant in the natural world outside the laboratory. Among 21 distinct mouse populations worldwide we identified a closely related wild relative to standard laboratory mouse strains. Its bacterial gut microbiome differed significantly from its laboratory mouse counterpart, and was transferred to and maintained in laboratory mice over several generations. Laboratory mice reconstituted with natural microbiota exhibited reduced inflammation and increased survival following influenza virus infection, and improved resistance against mutagen/inflammation-induced colorectal tumorigenesis. By demonstrating the host fitness-promoting traits of natural microbiota, our findings should enable the discovery of protective mechanisms relevant in the natural world and improve the modeling of complex diseases of free-living mammals. Characterization of a wild mice reference microbiome opens a window of opportunity to understand how the gut microbiota affects aspects of host physiology that are important in the natural world, outside the laboratory.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Environmental and ecological factors that shape the gut bacterial communities of fish: a meta-analysis.

              Symbiotic bacteria often help their hosts acquire nutrients from their diet, showing trends of co-evolution and independent acquisition by hosts from the same trophic levels. While these trends hint at important roles for biotic factors, the effects of the abiotic environment on symbiotic community composition remain comparably understudied. In this investigation, we examined the influence of abiotic and biotic factors on the gut bacterial communities of fish from different taxa, trophic levels and habitats. Phylogenetic and statistical analyses of 25 16S rRNA libraries revealed that salinity, trophic level and possibly host phylogeny shape the composition of fish gut bacteria. When analysed alongside bacterial communities from other environments, fish gut communities typically clustered with gut communities from mammals and insects. Similar consideration of individual phylotypes (vs. communities) revealed evolutionary ties between fish gut microbes and symbionts of animals, as many of the bacteria from the guts of herbivorous fish were closely related to those from mammals. Our results indicate that fish harbour more specialized gut communities than previously recognized. They also highlight a trend of convergent acquisition of similar bacterial communities by fish and mammals, raising the possibility that fish were the first to evolve symbioses resembling those found among extant gut fermenting mammals. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                Appl Environ Microbiol
                Appl. Environ. Microbiol
                aem
                aem
                AEM
                Applied and Environmental Microbiology
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                0099-2240
                1098-5336
                18 June 2018
                1 August 2018
                15 August 2018
                1 August 2018
                : 84
                : 16
                : e00691-18
                Affiliations
                [a ]Swansea University, College of Science, Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Research, Swansea, United Kingdom
                [b ]Swansea University, College of Medicine, Swansea, United Kingdom
                Chinese Academy of Sciences
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to Tamsyn M. Uren Webster, T.M.UrenWebster@ 123456swansea.ac.uk .

                Citation Uren Webster TM, Consuegra S, Hitchings M, Garcia de Leaniz C. 2018. Interpopulation variation in the Atlantic salmon microbiome reflects environmental and genetic diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e00691-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00691-18.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0072-9745
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4403-2509
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5527-4709
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1650-2729
                Article
                00691-18
                10.1128/AEM.00691-18
                6070748
                29915104
                ad299637-0cb7-4366-97e4-d5006e4485f7
                Copyright © 2018 Uren Webster et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

                History
                : 26 March 2018
                : 2 June 2018
                Page count
                supplementary-material: 1, Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 60, Pages: 14, Words: 8182
                Funding
                Funded by: RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000268;
                Award ID: BB/M026469/1
                Award Recipient : Award Recipient :
                Funded by: NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre (NEBC), https://doi.org/10.13039/100008668;
                Award ID: BB/M026469/1
                Award Recipient : Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (HEFCW), https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000383;
                Award ID: NRN-LCEE
                Award Recipient : Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Microbial Ecology
                Custom metadata
                August 2018

                Microbiology & Virology
                aquaculture,fish,microbiome
                Microbiology & Virology
                aquaculture, fish, microbiome

                Comments

                Comment on this article