48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recovery of Agricultural Odors and Odorous Compounds from Polyvinyl Fluoride Film Bags

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Accurate sampling methods are necessary when quantifying odor and volatile organic compound emissions at agricultural facilities. The commonly accepted methodology in the U.S. has been to collect odor samples in polyvinyl fluoride bags (PVF, brand name Tedlar®) and, subsequently, analyze with human panelists using dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. The purpose of this research was to simultaneously quantify and compare recoveries of odor and odorous compounds from both commercial and homemade PVF sampling bags. A standard gas mixture consisting of p-cresol (40 μg m −3) and seven volatile fatty acids: acetic (2,311 μg m −3), propionic (15,800 μg m −3), isobutyric (1,686 μg m −3), butyric (1,049 μg m −3), isovaleric (1,236 μg m −3), valeric (643 μg m −3), and hexanoic (2,158 μg m −3) was placed in the PVF bags at times of 1 h, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, and 7 d prior to compound and odor concentration analyses. Compound concentrations were quantified using sorbent tubes and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Odor concentration, intensity, and hedonic tone were measured using a panel of trained human subjects. Compound recoveries ranged from 2 to 40% after 1 h and 0 to 14% after 7 d. Between 1 h and 7 d, odor concentrations increased by 45% in commercial bags, and decreased by 39% in homemade bags. Minimal changes were observed in intensity and hedonic tone over the same time period. These results suggest that PVF bags can bias individual compound concentrations and odor as measured by dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Olfactory receptor antagonism between odorants.

          The detection of thousands of volatile odorants is mediated by several hundreds of different G protein-coupled olfactory receptors (ORs). The main strategy in encoding odorant identities is a combinatorial receptor code scheme in that different odorants are recognized by different sets of ORs. Despite increasing information on agonist-OR combinations, little is known about the antagonism of ORs in the mammalian olfactory system. Here we show that odorants inhibit odorant responses of OR(s), evidence of antagonism between odorants at the receptor level. The antagonism was demonstrated in a heterologous OR-expression system and in single olfactory neurons that expressed a given OR, and was also visualized at the level of the olfactory epithelium. Dual functions of odorants as an agonist and an antagonist to ORs indicate a new aspect in the receptor code determination for odorant mixtures that often give rise to novel perceptual qualities that are not present in each component. The current study also provides insight into strategies to modulate perceived odorant quality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Biochemical identification and biological origin of key odor components in livestock waste.

            Animal production results in conversion of feeds into valuable products such as meat, milk, eggs, and wool as well as into unavoidable and less desirable waste products. Intensification of animal numbers and increasing urbanization has resulted in considerable attention to odorous gases produced from animal wastes. It is clear that animal manure was, and still is, a valuable resource. However, it may be a major obstacle to future development of the animal industry if its impact on the environment is not properly controlled. Poor odor prevention and control from animal wastes is related to a lack of knowledge of the fundamental nature of odor and its production by farm animals. Odor, like noise, is a nuisance or disturbance and there is no universally accepted definition of an objectionable odor. Thus, regulation and control of odors in the environment is difficult because of the technical difficulties of defining odor limits and their measurement and evaluation. A variety of direct (sensory) and indirect (analytical instruments) methods for measuring odor intensity and determination of individual or key odor components are discussed. The biological origins of the four principal classes of odor compounds, namely branched- and straight-chain VFA, ammonia and volatile amines, indoles and phenols, and the volatile sulfur-containing compounds, are reviewed. Because more than 50% of N from animals is excreted as urea, one strategy to conserve N in waste is to inhibit the urease enzyme that converts urea to ammonia. Laboratory studies to evaluate di- and triamide compounds to control urea hydrolysis in slurries of cattle and swine wastes are presented. Finally, a brief overview of various intervention strategies is provided. Multiple combinations of nutritional management, housing systems, treatment options as well as storage and disposal of animal wastes will be required to reduce environmental pollution and provide for long-term sustainable growth.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Suitability of different polymer bags for storage of volatile sulphur compounds relevant to breath analysis

              Suitability of five polymer sampling containers (Nalophan, transparent Tedlar, black layered Tedlar, Teflon and FlexFoil) for sampling and storage of six relevant to breath analysis volatile sulphur compounds: H(2)S, MeSH, EtSH, COS, DMS and CS(2) was studied using solid phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Investigations were made with respect to the several factors like: recovery, background, influence of light, ageing effect and matrix effects. Additionally, the optimal reusability conditions were established. Findings suggest analyzing the breath VSCs within 6h after sampling. Flexfoil bags were found to be the best choice for the VSCs storage up to 24h (recovery about 90% with the exception of DMS). For shorter storing times (6-8h) transparent Tedlar is a good alternative for Flexfoil (losses up to 10%).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
                1424-8220
                2010
                13 September 2010
                : 10
                : 9
                : 8536-8552
                Affiliations
                [1 ] USDA-ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, 68933 USA
                [2 ] Adams State College, Alamosa, CO, 81102 USA; E-Mail: zenabuser@ 123456adams.edu
                [3 ] USDA-ARS, Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, TX, 79012 USA; E-Mail: andy.cole@ 123456ars.usda.gov
                [4 ] Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011 USA; E-Mail: koziel@ 123456iastate.edu
                Author notes
                [* ]Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: david.parker@ 123456ars.usda.gov ; Tel.: +1-402-762-4277; Fax: +1-402-762-4273.
                Article
                sensors-10-08536
                10.3390/s100908536
                3231241
                22163671
                ac11210b-20b6-49b9-89a2-d73921b67d57
                © 2010 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 7 July 2010
                : 2 August 2010
                : 20 August 2010
                Categories
                Article

                Biomedical engineering
                odor detection threshold,gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,odor activity value,tedlar,single-compound odor threshold,animal feeding operation,volatile fatty acid,odor sampling,volatile organic compound

                Comments

                Comment on this article