29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Environmental Impacts of Personal Protective Clothing Used to Combat COVID‐ 19

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Personal protective clothing is critical to shield users from highly infectious diseases including COVID‐19. Such clothing is predominantly single‐use, made of plastic‐based synthetic fibers such as polypropylene and polyester, low cost and able to provide protection against pathogens. However, the environmental impacts of synthetic fiber‐based clothing are significant and well‐documented. Despite growing environmental concerns with single‐use plastic‐based protective clothing, the recent COVID‐19 pandemic has seen a significant increase in their use, which could result in a further surge of oceanic plastic pollution, adding to the mass of plastic waste that already threatens marine life. In this review, the nature of the raw materials involved in the production of such clothing, as well as manufacturing techniques and the personal protective equipment supply chain are briefly discussed. The environmental impacts at critical points in the protective clothing value chain are identified from production to consumption, focusing on water use, chemical pollution, CO 2 emissions, and waste. On the basis of these environmental impacts, the need for fundamental changes in the business model is outlined, including increased usage of reusable protective clothing, addressing supply chain “bottlenecks”, establishing better waste management, and the use of sustainable materials and processes without associated environmental problems.

          Abstract

          The environmental impacts are reviewed for personal protective clothing from production to consumption, focusing on water use, chemical pollution, CO 2 emissions, and waste. Based on these environmental impacts, the need for fundamental changes are outlined, including increased usage of reusable protective clothing, addressing supply chain “bottlenecks”, establishing better waste management, and the use of sustainable materials and processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The impact and effectiveness of the general public wearing masks to reduce the spread of pandemics in the UK: a multidisciplinary comparison of single-use masks versus reusable face masks

          During the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the UK government mandated the use of face masks in various public settings and recommended the use of reusable masks to combat shortages of medically graded single-use masks in healthcare. To assist decision-making on the choice of masks for future pandemics, where shortages may not be a contributing factor, the University College London (UCL) Plastic Waste Innovation Hub has carried out a multidisciplinary comparison between single-use and reusable masks based on their anatomy, standalone effectiveness, behavioural considerations, environmental impact and costs. Although current single-use masks have a higher standalone effectiveness against bacteria and viruses, studies show that reusable masks have adequate performance in slowing infection rates of respiratory viruses. Material flow analysis (MFA), life cycle assessment (LCA) and cost comparison show that reusable masks have a lower environmental and economic impact than single-use masks. If every person in the UK uses one single-use mask each day for a year, it will create a total of 124,000 tonnes of waste, 66,000 tonnes of which would be unrecyclable contaminated plastic waste (the masks), with the rest being the recyclable packaging typically used for transportation and distribution of masks. Using reusable masks creates >85% less waste, generates 3.5 times lower impact on climate change and incurs 3.7 times lower costs. Further behavioural research is necessary to understand the extent and current practices of mask use; and how these practices affect mask effectiveness in reducing infection rates. Wearing single-use masks may be preferred over reusable masks due to perceptions of increased hygiene and convenience. Understanding behaviour towards the regular machine-washing of reusable masks for their effective reuse is key to maximise their public health benefits and minimise environmental and economic costs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            The new plastics economy: Rethinking the future of plastics

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Additives for Plastics Handbook

              (2001)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nazmul.karim@uwe.ac.uk
                Journal
                Adv Sustain Syst
                Adv Sustain Syst
                10.1002/(ISSN)2366-7486
                ADSU
                Advanced Sustainable Systems
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2366-7486
                13 October 2021
                13 October 2021
                : 2100176
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Dyes and Chemical Engineering Bangladesh University of Textiles Tejgaon Dhaka 1208 Bangladesh
                [ 2 ] Centre for Print Research (CFPR) The University of West of England Frenchay Campus Bristol BS16 1QY UK
                [ 3 ] Department of Environmental Science and Engineering Bangladesh University of Textiles Tejgaon Dhaka 1208 Bangladesh
                [ 4 ] Clothworkers’ Centre for Textile Materials Innovation for Healthcare School of Design University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT UK
                [ 5 ] Department of Materials Science and Engineering National University of Singapore 9 Engineering Drive 1 Singapore 117575 Singapore
                [ 6 ] Institute for Functional Intelligent Materials National University of Singapore 9 Engineering Drive 1 Singapore 117575 Singapore
                [ 7 ] Chongqing 2D Materials Institute Liangjiang New Area Chongqing 400714 China
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0469-261X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4426-8995
                Article
                ADSU202100176
                10.1002/adsu.202100176
                8646872
                34901387
                ab6b8bdb-39e8-464c-bef4-7d2b22b9b73d
                © 2021 The Authors. Advanced Sustainable Systems published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 September 2021
                : 03 June 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 15, Tables: 1, Pages: 19, Words: 11025
                Categories
                Review
                Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.9 mode:remove_FC converted:06.12.2021

                covid‐19,environmental impact,plastic pollution,personal protective equipment,protective clothing,sustainability

                Comments

                Comment on this article