33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Advances in Designing and Developing Vaccines, Drugs, and Therapies to Counter Ebola Virus

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ebola virus (EBOV), a member of the family Filoviridae, is responsible for causing Ebola virus disease (EVD) (formerly named Ebola hemorrhagic fever). This is a severe, often fatal illness with mortality rates varying from 50 to 90% in humans. Although the virus and associated disease has been recognized since 1976, it was only when the recent outbreak of EBOV in 2014–2016 highlighted the danger and global impact of this virus, necessitating the need for coming up with the effective vaccines and drugs to counter its pandemic threat. Albeit no commercial vaccine is available so far against EBOV, a few vaccine candidates are under evaluation and clinical trials to assess their prophylactic efficacy. These include recombinant viral vector (recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus vector, chimpanzee adenovirus type 3-vector, and modified vaccinia Ankara virus), Ebola virus-like particles, virus-like replicon particles, DNA, and plant-based vaccines. Due to improvement in the field of genomics and proteomics, epitope-targeted vaccines have gained top priority. Correspondingly, several therapies have also been developed, including immunoglobulins against specific viral structures small cell-penetrating antibody fragments that target intracellular EBOV proteins. Small interfering RNAs and oligomer-mediated inhibition have also been verified for EVD treatment. Other treatment options include viral entry inhibitors, transfusion of convalescent blood/serum, neutralizing antibodies, and gene expression inhibitors. Repurposed drugs, which have proven safety profiles, can be adapted after high-throughput screening for efficacy and potency for EVD treatment. Herbal and other natural products are also being explored for EVD treatment. Further studies to better understand the pathogenesis and antigenic structures of the virus can help in developing an effective vaccine and identifying appropriate antiviral targets. This review presents the recent advances in designing and developing vaccines, drugs, and therapies to counter the EBOV threat.

          Related collections

          Most cited references240

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ebola virus. Two-pore channels control Ebola virus host cell entry and are drug targets for disease treatment.

          Ebola virus causes sporadic outbreaks of lethal hemorrhagic fever in humans, but there is no currently approved therapy. Cells take up Ebola virus by macropinocytosis, followed by trafficking through endosomal vesicles. However, few factors controlling endosomal virus movement are known. Here we find that Ebola virus entry into host cells requires the endosomal calcium channels called two-pore channels (TPCs). Disrupting TPC function by gene knockout, small interfering RNAs, or small-molecule inhibitors halted virus trafficking and prevented infection. Tetrandrine, the most potent small molecule that we tested, inhibited infection of human macrophages, the primary target of Ebola virus in vivo, and also showed therapeutic efficacy in mice. Therefore, TPC proteins play a key role in Ebola virus infection and may be effective targets for antiviral therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Experimental Treatment with Favipiravir for Ebola Virus Disease (the JIKI Trial): A Historically Controlled, Single-Arm Proof-of-Concept Trial in Guinea

            Background Ebola virus disease (EVD) is a highly lethal condition for which no specific treatment has proven efficacy. In September 2014, while the Ebola outbreak was at its peak, the World Health Organization released a short list of drugs suitable for EVD research. Favipiravir, an antiviral developed for the treatment of severe influenza, was one of these. In late 2014, the conditions for starting a randomized Ebola trial were not fulfilled for two reasons. One was the perception that, given the high number of patients presenting simultaneously and the very high mortality rate of the disease, it was ethically unacceptable to allocate patients from within the same family or village to receive or not receive an experimental drug, using a randomization process impossible to understand by very sick patients. The other was that, in the context of rumors and distrust of Ebola treatment centers, using a randomized design at the outset might lead even more patients to refuse to seek care. Therefore, we chose to conduct a multicenter non-randomized trial, in which all patients would receive favipiravir along with standardized care. The objectives of the trial were to test the feasibility and acceptability of an emergency trial in the context of a large Ebola outbreak, and to collect data on the safety and effectiveness of favipiravir in reducing mortality and viral load in patients with EVD. The trial was not aimed at directly informing future guidelines on Ebola treatment but at quickly gathering standardized preliminary data to optimize the design of future studies. Methods and Findings Inclusion criteria were positive Ebola virus reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) test, age ≥ 1 y, weight ≥ 10 kg, ability to take oral drugs, and informed consent. All participants received oral favipiravir (day 0: 6,000 mg; day 1 to day 9: 2,400 mg/d). Semi-quantitative Ebola virus RT-PCR (results expressed in “cycle threshold” [Ct]) and biochemistry tests were performed at day 0, day 2, day 4, end of symptoms, day 14, and day 30. Frozen samples were shipped to a reference biosafety level 4 laboratory for RNA viral load measurement using a quantitative reference technique (genome copies/milliliter). Outcomes were mortality, viral load evolution, and adverse events. The analysis was stratified by age and Ct value. A “target value” of mortality was defined a priori for each stratum, to guide the interpretation of interim and final analysis. Between 17 December 2014 and 8 April 2015, 126 patients were included, of whom 111 were analyzed (adults and adolescents, ≥13 y, n = 99; young children, ≤6 y, n = 12). Here we present the results obtained in the 99 adults and adolescents. Of these, 55 had a baseline Ct value ≥ 20 (Group A Ct ≥ 20), and 44 had a baseline Ct value < 20 (Group A Ct < 20). Ct values and RNA viral loads were well correlated, with Ct = 20 corresponding to RNA viral load = 7.7 log10 genome copies/ml. Mortality was 20% (95% CI 11.6%–32.4%) in Group A Ct ≥ 20 and 91% (95% CI 78.8%–91.1%) in Group A Ct < 20. Both mortality 95% CIs included the predefined target value (30% and 85%, respectively). Baseline serum creatinine was ≥110 μmol/l in 48% of patients in Group A Ct ≥ 20 (≥300 μmol/l in 14%) and in 90% of patients in Group A Ct < 20 (≥300 μmol/l in 44%). In Group A Ct ≥ 20, 17% of patients with baseline creatinine ≥110 μmol/l died, versus 97% in Group A Ct < 20. In patients who survived, the mean decrease in viral load was 0.33 log10 copies/ml per day of follow-up. RNA viral load values and mortality were not significantly different between adults starting favipiravir within <72 h of symptoms compared to others. Favipiravir was well tolerated. Conclusions In the context of an outbreak at its peak, with crowded care centers, randomizing patients to receive either standard care or standard care plus an experimental drug was not felt to be appropriate. We did a non-randomized trial. This trial reaches nuanced conclusions. On the one hand, we do not conclude on the efficacy of the drug, and our conclusions on tolerance, although encouraging, are not as firm as they could have been if we had used randomization. On the other hand, we learned about how to quickly set up and run an Ebola trial, in close relationship with the community and non-governmental organizations; we integrated research into care so that it improved care; and we generated knowledge on EVD that is useful to further research. Our data illustrate the frequency of renal dysfunction and the powerful prognostic value of low Ct values. They suggest that drug trials in EVD should systematically stratify analyses by baseline Ct value, as a surrogate of viral load. They also suggest that favipiravir monotherapy merits further study in patients with medium to high viremia, but not in those with very high viremia. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02329054
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Successful treatment of advanced Ebola virus infection with T-705 (favipiravir) in a small animal model.

              Outbreaks of Ebola hemorrhagic fever in sub-Saharan Africa are associated with case fatality rates of up to 90%. Currently, neither a vaccine nor an effective antiviral treatment is available for use in humans. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of the pyrazinecarboxamide derivative T-705 (favipiravir) against Zaire Ebola virus (EBOV) in vitro and in vivo. T-705 suppressed replication of Zaire EBOV in cell culture by 4log units with an IC90 of 110μM. Mice lacking the type I interferon receptor (IFNAR(-)(/)(-)) were used as in vivo model for Zaire EBOV-induced disease. Initiation of T-705 administration at day 6 post infection induced rapid virus clearance, reduced biochemical parameters of disease severity, and prevented a lethal outcome in 100% of the animals. The findings suggest that T-705 is a candidate for treatment of Ebola hemorrhagic fever. Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/369244
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/403500
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/403489
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/462062
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/399656
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/594491
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/403863
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/85874
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/133365
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/595613
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/532054
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/77955
                URI : https://frontiersin.org/people/u/329475
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                10 August 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 1803
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Division of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Bareilly, India
                [2] 2Central University Laboratory, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University , Chennai, India
                [3] 3Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, Barkatullah University , Bhopal, India
                [4] 4Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry , Agartala, India
                [5] 5Immunology Section, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Bareilly, India
                [6] 6Division of Veterinary Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Bareilly, India
                [7] 7Division of Virology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Nainital, Uttarakhand, India
                [8] 8Division of Biological Standardization, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Bareilly, India
                [9] 9Division of Veterinary Public Health, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Bareilly, India
                [10] 10ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
                [11] 11Center of Research Excellence on Therapeutic Proteins and Antibody Engineering, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine SIriraj Hospital, Mahidol University , Bangkok, Thailand
                Author notes

                Edited by: Hiroyuki Oshiumi, Kumamoto University, Japan

                Reviewed by: Oscar Negrete, Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), United States; Pei Xu, Sun Yat-sen University, China; Yohei Kurosaki, Nagasaki University, Japan

                *Correspondence: Kuldeep Dhama, kdhama@ 123456rediffmail.com ; Yashpal Singh Malik, malikyps@ 123456gmail.com

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Microbial Immunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2018.01803
                6095993
                30147687
                ab612a92-a520-4347-988f-1f6031d3eba5
                Copyright © 2018 Dhama, Karthik, Khandia, Chakraborty, Munjal, Latheef, Kumar, Ramakrishnan, Malik, Singh, Malik, Singh and Chaicumpa.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 April 2018
                : 23 July 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 282, Pages: 27, Words: 22485
                Categories
                Immunology
                Review

                Immunology
                ebola virus,ebola virus disease,vaccines,prophylactics,drugs,therapeutics,treatment
                Immunology
                ebola virus, ebola virus disease, vaccines, prophylactics, drugs, therapeutics, treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article