8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The effect of increasing lifespan and recycling rate on carbon storage in wood products from theoretical model to application for the European wood sector

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The use of wood products is often promoted as a climate change mitigation option to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. In previous literature, we identified longevity and recycling rate as two determining factors that influence the carbon stock in wood products, but no studies have predicted the effect of improved wood use on carbon storage over time. In this study, we aimed at evaluating changes in the lifespan and the recycling rate as two options for enhancing carbon stock in wood products for different time horizons. We first explored the behaviour over time of both factors in a theoretical simulation, and then calculated their effect for the European wood sector of the future. The theoretical simulation shows that the carbon stock in wood products increases linearly when increasing the average lifespan of wood products and exponentially when improving the recycling rate. The emissions savings under the current use of wood products in Europe in 2030 were estimated at 57.65 Mt carbon dioxide (CO 2) per year. This amount could be increased 5 Mt CO 2 if average lifespan increased 19.54 % or if recycling rate increased 20.92 % in 2017. However, the combination of both strategies could increase the emissions saving almost 5 Mt CO 2 more by 2030. Incrementing recycling rate of paper and paperboard is the best short-term strategy (2030) to reduce emissions, but elongating average lifespan of wood-based panels is a better strategy for longer term periods (2046).

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11027-016-9722-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Estimating biomass carbon stocks for a Mediterranean forest in central Spain using LiDAR height and intensity data

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Carbon sequestration in the trees, products and soils of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples.

              A carbon-flow model for managed forest plantations was used to estimate carbon storage in UK plantations differing in Yield Class (growth rate), thinning regime and species characteristics. Time-averaged, total carbon storage (at equilibrium) was generally in the range 40-80 Mg C ha(-1) in trees, 15-25 Mg C ha(-1) in above- and belowground litter, 70-90 Mg C ha(-1) in soil organic matter and 20-40 Mg C ha(-1) in wood products (assuming product lifetime equalled rotation length). The rate of carbon storage during the first rotation in most plantations was in the range 2-5 Mg C ha(-1) year(-1).A sensitivity analysis revealed the following processes to be both uncertain and critical: the fraction of total woody biomass in branches and roots; litter and soil organic matter decomposition rates; and rates of fine root turnover. Other variables, including the time to canopy closure and the possibility of accelerated decomposition after harvest, were less critical. The lifetime of wood products was not critical to total carbon storage because wood products formed only a modest fraction of the total.The average increase in total carbon storage in the tree-soil-product system per unit increase in Yield Class (m(3) ha(-1) year(-1)) for unthinned Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. plantations was 5.6 Mg C ha(-1). Increasing the Yield Class from 6 to 24 m(3) ha(-1) year(-1) increased the rate of carbon storage in the first rotation from 2.5 to 5.6 Mg C ha(-1) year(-1) in unthinned plantations. Thinning reduced total carbon storage in P. sitchensis plantations by about 15%, and is likely to reduce carbon storage in all plantation types.If the objective is to store carbon rapidly in the short term and achieve high carbon storage in the long term, Populus plantations growing on fertile land (2.7 m spacing, 26-year rotations, Yield Class 12) were the best option examined. If the objective is to achieve high carbon storage in the medium term (50 years) without regard to the initial rate of storage, then plantations of conifers of any species with above-average Yield Classes would suffice. In the long term (100 years), broadleaved plantations of oak and beech store as much carbon as conifer plantations. Mini-rotations (10 years) do not achieve a high carbon storage.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +49 33432 82 411 , Pau.Brunet@zalf.de
                +49 33432 82 276 , Hubert.Jochheim@zalf.de
                +32 16 329726 , Bart.Muys@ees.kuleuven.be
                Journal
                Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang
                Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang
                Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                1381-2386
                1573-1596
                9 September 2016
                9 September 2016
                2017
                : 22
                : 8
                : 1193-1205
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Institute of Landscape Systems Analysis, Eberswalder Straße 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0668 7884, GRID grid.5596.f, Division Forest, Nature and Landscape, , University of Leuven, ; Celestijnenlaan 200E-2411, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9615-4810
                Article
                9722
                10.1007/s11027-016-9722-z
                6054007
                ab2c3058-bc33-482b-976b-697f90bd1a96
                © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016
                History
                : 1 March 2016
                : 8 August 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: Seventh Framework Programme (BE)
                Award ID: 316020
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

                cascade use,climate change mitigation,modelling,carbon sequestration,time scale

                Comments

                Comment on this article