9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Intracranial hemorrhage and COVID-19, but please do not forget “old diseases” and elective surgery

      letter
      a , b , *
      Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
      Elsevier Inc.
      SARS-CoV, Coronavirus, COVID-19, Intracranial hemorrhage, Neuroscience

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, The current COVID-19 pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread across the world with over 55.000.000 reported cases. Patients typically present with fever, shortness of breath and cough, but some patients presented with additionally neurologic manifestations, such as headache, loss of smell and taste, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and seizures, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2, displays neurotropism and enters the central nervous system (Di Carlo et al., 2020 Aug). Patients with COVID-19 infection are at increased risk for thrombotic events, as various anticoagulation regimens are now being considered for these patients. Anticoagulation is known to increase the risk for adverse bleeding events, of which ICHs is one of the most feared (Dogra et al., 2020 Aug), with a reporting overall mortality rate of about 48.6% in the COVID-19 patients with ICH (Cheruiyot et al., 2020 Nov). I read publications on “Intracerebral haemorrhage and COVID-19: Clinical characteristics from a case series” and on “The COVID-19 emergency does not rule out the diagnostic arsenal in intracerebral hemorrhage: do not forget the old enemies” with a great interest (Benger et al., 2020 Aug, Cucu et al., 2020). Benger et al. (2020) Aug reported the clinical, radiological and laboratory characteristics of ICH in COVID-19 patients that are much less described compared to ischaemic strokes in patients with COVID-19. On the other hand, Cucu et al. (2020) pointed out the attention that not only primary ICHs can occur in COVID-19 patients, but also secondary ICHs due to arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), aneurysms, cavernous malformations, dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs), cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and brain tumors, suggesting us not to forget “old enemies” also non-COVID-19 patients at this historic moment. Neurovascular, brain tumor, dementia and other chronic brain diseases are always present in a certain percentage among the population. Elective surgery in many hospitals all over the world has been cancelled to ensure adequate hospital capacity to respond to COVID-19 and to expand their intensive care capacity. This is correct, but although most operations and procedures are described as “elective,” these interventions are essential contributors to patient health, to the wellbeing of communities and to the good quality of life of people (Meredith et al., 2020 Oct 5). Some elective and most non-elective surgeries must continue throughout any pandemic as “old diseases” continue to exist and non-COVID-19 patients require to be treat also for other neurosurgical, neurological and psychiatric pathologies. Lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption to brain cancer diagnosis and management, as well as a less precise management of patients with chronic brain neurological and psychiatric diseases. For this reason, if the prevalence of COVID-19 is not too high and hospital resources are coping with demand for ward and ICU beds, more elective surgery must be recommended, as not all other diseases can wait the end of pandemic. Although COVID-19 ban on elective surgeries might show us some people can delay them especially degenerative pathologies of the spine, surgery is an essential part of modern medicine (Myles and Maswime, 2020 Jul 4). Globally just right after the first COVID-19 wave, many governments and professional bodies moved from a position of curtailment to reopening of elective surgery, even if this require low prevalence in the community and access to SARS-CoV-2 testing, ensuring sufficient hospital, ICU beds and all other necessary medical supplies (Myles and Maswime, 2020 Jul 4). Patients with chronic medical diseases can be followed by telemedicine, a good and essential tool to avoid unnecessary travel to hospitals and clinics reducing the potential risk of COVID-19 infection (Montemurro and Perrini, 2020 Jun), whereas surgical brain and spine elective diseases necessarily require access to the hospital. The emotional toll is also substantial and must be taken into account at this time, with patients delaying preventive care or operations because of concern about exposure to SARS-CoV-2, along with anxiety and apprehension over the safety of returning to health care centers (Meredith et al., 2020 Oct 5, Montemurro, 2020 Jul). COVID-19 might affect access to elective safe surgery, especially in low-income and middle-income countries and for homeless people, migrants and refugees. Declaration of Competing Interest The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The emotional impact of COVID-19: From medical staff to common people

          Dear Editor, In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic, pointing to over 110 countries and territories around the world where the coronavirus illness is present. Infectious disease outbreaks such as COVID-19, as well as other public health events, can cause emotional distress and anxiety. These feelings of distress and anxiety can occur even in people not at high risk of getting sick, in the face of a virus with which the common people may be unfamiliar. I read publications on “Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in COVID-19 control” and on “Traumatization in medical staff helping with COVID-19 control” with a great interest (Li et al., 2020, Joob and Wiwanitkit, 2020). Li et al. reported how much people and medical staff suffer from vicarious traumatization and how this vicarious traumatization of non-front-line medical staff is more serious than that of front-line medical staff (Li et al., 2020). As in South and Southeast Asia countries, also in Italy, there are similar problems in medical staff due to high workload and intermittent lack of protective devices. In addition, some slight form of racism is demonstrated against health care professionals who potentially have a higher risk of being infected and between non-front-line medical staff towards front-line medical staff. We don’t have to forget the many doctors and nurses were infected and many of them died due to COVID-19 infection. Also in Italy, local people also have high levels of stress due to no firm estimate of how long pandemic will last and how long our lives will be disrupted or whether or not we or our loved ones will be infected. Previous research has revealed a profound and wide spectrum of psychological impact that outbreaks can inflict on people (Lima et al., 2020). New psychiatric symptoms in people without mental illness can occur or aggravate the condition of those with pre-existing mental illness and cause distress to the caregivers of affected individuals (Kelvin and Rubino, 2020). Most health professionals working in isolation units and hospitals very often do not receive any training for providing mental health care (Lima et al., 2020). Barbisch et al. (2015) described how the confinement “caused a sense of collective hysteria, leading the staff to desperate measures”. Suicidal cases were reported in India (Goyal et al., 2020) but also in other countries, Italy included, where two infected Italian nurses committed suicide in a period of a few days probably due to fear of spreading COVID-19 to patients. It is possible that fear and anxiety of falling sick or dying, helplessness will drive an increase in the 2020 suicide rates. In the United States (US), the COVID-19 Pandemic’s New Epicenter, a dedicated Lifeline (the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline) was activated for emotional distress related to COVID-19 to prevent suicide. Declaration of Competing Interest The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hemorrhagic stroke and anticoagulation in COVID-19

            Background and Purpose : Patients with the Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) are at increased risk for thrombotic events and mortality. Various anticoagulation regimens are now being considered for these patients. Anticoagulation is known to increase the risk for adverse bleeding events, of which intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most feared. We present a retrospective study of 33 patients positive for COVID-19 with neuroimaging-documented ICH and examine anticoagulation use in this population. Methods : Patients over the age of 18 with confirmed COVID-19 and radiographic evidence of ICH were included in this study. Evidence of hemorrhage was confirmed and categorized by a fellowship trained neuroradiologist. Electronic health records were analyzed for patient information including demographic data, medical history, hospital course, laboratory values, and medications. Results : We identified 33 COVID-19 positive patients with ICH, mean age 61.6 years (range 37 to 83 years), 21.2% of whom were female. Parenchymal hemorrhages with mass effect and herniation occurred in 5 (15.2%) patients, with a 100% mortality rate. Of the remaining 28 patients with ICH, 7 (25%) had punctate hemorrhages, 17 (60.7%) had small- moderate size hemorrhages, and 4 (14.3%) had a large single site of hemorrhage without evidence of herniation. Almost all patients received either therapeutic dose anticoagulation (in 22 [66.7%] patients) or prophylactic dose (in 3 [9.1] patients) prior to ICH discovery. Conclusions : Anticoagulation therapy may be considered in patients with COVID-19 though the risk of ICH should be taken into account when developing a treatment regimen.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) and COVID-19: Clinical characteristics from a case series

              Highlights • We demonstrate five consecutive cases of predominantly lobar COVID-19-associated intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). • Patients were typically relatively young with a severe, prolonged inflammatory prodrome. • COVID-19-induced endotheliitis/endotheliopathy may underlie associated cerebrovascular events. • For the clinician, anticoagulation decisions must balance risk of thrombosis with risk of haemorrhage.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Brain Behav Immun
                Brain Behav Immun
                Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
                Elsevier Inc.
                0889-1591
                1090-2139
                25 November 2020
                25 November 2020
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (AOUP), Pisa, Italy
                [b ]Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Savi, 10 – 56126, Pisa, Italy
                Article
                S0889-1591(20)32410-7
                10.1016/j.bbi.2020.11.034
                7686707
                33246005
                ab09cdbe-b1a5-42be-8365-52ade769843e
                © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 18 November 2020
                : 23 November 2020
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Neurosciences
                sars-cov,coronavirus,covid-19,intracranial hemorrhage,neuroscience
                Neurosciences
                sars-cov, coronavirus, covid-19, intracranial hemorrhage, neuroscience

                Comments

                Comment on this article