49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Emerging human infectious diseases and the links to global food production

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Infectious diseases are emerging globally at an unprecedented rate while global food demand is projected to increase sharply by 2100. Here, we synthesize the pathways by which projected agricultural expansion and intensification will influence human infectious diseases and how human infectious diseases might likewise affect food production and distribution. Feeding 11 billion people will require substantial increases in crop and animal production that will expand agricultural use of antibiotics, water, pesticides and fertilizer, and contact rates between humans and both wild and domestic animals, all with consequences for the emergence and spread of infectious agents. Indeed, our synthesis of the literature suggests that, since 1940, agricultural drivers were associated with >25% of all — and >50% of zoonotic — infectious diseases that emerged in humans, proportions that will likely increase as agriculture expands and intensifies. We identify agricultural and disease management and policy actions, and additional research, needed to address the public health challenge posed by feeding 11 billion people.

          Abstract

          Population growth and economic development affect and are affected by infectious diseases and food production. This Review synthesizes understanding about the links between emerging infectious diseases and food production, finding strong associations worldwide.

          Related collections

          Most cited references105

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk.

          An estimated 779 million people are at risk of schistosomiasis, of whom 106 million (13.6%) live in irrigation schemes or in close proximity to large dam reservoirs. We identified 58 studies that examined the relation between water resources development projects and schistosomiasis, primarily in African settings. We present a systematic literature review and meta-analysis with the following objectives: (1) to update at-risk populations of schistosomiasis and number of people infected in endemic countries, and (2) to quantify the risk of water resources development and management on schistosomiasis. Using 35 datasets from 24 African studies, our meta-analysis showed pooled random risk ratios of 2.4 and 2.6 for urinary and intestinal schistosomiasis, respectively, among people living adjacent to dam reservoirs. The risk ratio estimate for studies evaluating the effect of irrigation on urinary schistosomiasis was in the range 0.02-7.3 (summary estimate 1.1) and that on intestinal schistosomiasis in the range 0.49-23.0 (summary estimate 4.7). Geographic stratification showed important spatial differences, idiosyncratic to the type of water resources development. We conclude that the development and management of water resources is an important risk factor for schistosomiasis, and hence strategies to mitigate negative effects should become integral parts in the planning, implementation, and operation of future water projects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity.

            A central challenge for sustainability is how to preserve forest ecosystems and the services that they provide us while enhancing food production. This challenge for developing countries confronts the force of economic globalization, which seeks cropland that is shrinking in availability and triggers deforestation. Four mechanisms-the displacement, rebound, cascade, and remittance effects-that are amplified by economic globalization accelerate land conversion. A few developing countries have managed a land use transition over the recent decades that simultaneously increased their forest cover and agricultural production. These countries have relied on various mixes of agricultural intensification, land use zoning, forest protection, increased reliance on imported food and wood products, the creation of off-farm jobs, foreign capital investments, and remittances. Sound policies and innovations can therefore reconcile forest preservation with food production. Globalization can be harnessed to increase land use efficiency rather than leading to uncontrolled land use expansion. To do so, land systems should be understood and modeled as open systems with large flows of goods, people, and capital that connect local land use with global-scale factors.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Farming and the fate of wild nature.

              World food demand is expected to more than double by 2050. Decisions about how to meet this challenge will have profound effects on wild species and habitats. We show that farming is already the greatest extinction threat to birds (the best known taxon), and its adverse impacts look set to increase, especially in developing countries. Two competing solutions have been proposed: wildlife-friendly farming (which boosts densities of wild populations on farmland but may decrease agricultural yields) and land sparing (which minimizes demand for farmland by increasing yield). We present a model that identifies how to resolve the trade-off between these approaches. This shows that the best type of farming for species persistence depends on the demand for agricultural products and on how the population densities of different species on farmland change with agricultural yield. Empirical data on such density-yield functions are sparse, but evidence from a range of taxa in developing countries suggests that high-yield farming may allow more species to persist.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jasonrohr@gmail.com
                Journal
                Nat Sustain
                Nat Sustain
                Nature Sustainability
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2398-9629
                11 June 2019
                2019
                : 2
                : 6
                : 445-456
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2168 0066, GRID grid.131063.6, Department of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute for Global Health, and Environmental Change Initiative, , University of Notre Dame, ; Notre Dame, IN USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2353 285X, GRID grid.170693.a, Department of Integrative Biology, , University of South Florida, ; Tampa, FL USA
                [3 ]ISNI 000000041936877X, GRID grid.5386.8, Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, , Cornell University, ; Ithaca, NY USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0941 6502, GRID grid.189967.8, Department of Biology, , Emory University, ; Atlanta, GA USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000000419368657, GRID grid.17635.36, Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, , University of Minnesota, ; St Paul, MN USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000000419368956, GRID grid.168010.e, Department of Biology and Woods Institute for the Environment, , Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, ; Pacific Grove, CA USA
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2097 4281, GRID grid.29857.31, Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, , Pennsylvania State University, ; College Station, PA USA
                [8 ]GRID grid.490007.a, Laboratoire de Recherches Biomédicales, Espoir pour la Santé, ; Saint-Louis, Senegal
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8756 8029, GRID grid.285538.1, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, ; Millbrook, NY USA
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2181 7878, GRID grid.47840.3f, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, , University of California, Berkeley, ; Berkeley, CA USA
                [11 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9676, GRID grid.133342.4, Marine Science Institute, , University of California, Santa Barbara, ; Santa Barbara, CA USA
                [12 ]ISNI 0000000419368657, GRID grid.17635.36, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, , University of Minnesota, ; St Paul, MN USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-8513
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1916-1002
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3707-9301
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0223-4615
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6395-7676
                Article
                293
                10.1038/s41893-019-0293-3
                7091874
                32219187
                aaeabfcd-508a-4eb4-b44f-46ac0b455316
                © Springer Nature Limited 2019

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 25 September 2018
                : 17 April 2019
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2019

                ecological epidemiology,diseases,risk factors,agriculture,developing world

                Comments

                Comment on this article