9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PTSD and complex PTSD in sentenced male prisoners in the UK: prevalence, trauma antecedents, and psychiatric comorbidities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is highly prevalent within prison settings, yet is often unidentified and undertreated. Complex PTSD (CPTSD) has been recently formally recognised in the International Classification of Diseases 11th revision (ICD-11) diagnostic framework but has never been explored in prison settings. We aimed to establish the prevalence of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD in a UK prison sample using a validated instrument (the International Trauma Questionnaire). We also explored the associations of these two diagnoses with their traumatic antecedents and psychiatric comorbidities.

          Method

          Randomly selected male, sentenced prisoners in a large medium-security prison in south London ( N = 221) took part in a clinical interview which assessed PTSD, CPTSD, trauma histories, and comorbid disorders. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to examine differences between those with PTSD or CPTSD, and those without symptoms.

          Results

          A total of 7.7% (95% CI 4.5–12) of the male sentenced prisoners met diagnostic criteria for ICD-11 PTSD and 16.7% (95% CI 12.1–22.3) for CPTSD. A diagnosis of PTSD was associated with more recent traumatic exposure, comorbid generalised anxiety disorder, alcohol dependence, and Cluster B personality disorder. A diagnosis of CPTSD was associated with complex trauma exposure antecedents (developmental, interpersonal, repeated, or multiple forms), and comorbid with anxiety, depression, substance misuse, psychosis, and ADHD.

          Conclusions

          This study confirms that CPTSD is a very common and comorbid condition in male prisoners. There is an urgent need to develop trauma-informed care in prisons.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.

          Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders; however, there is no brief clinical measure for assessing GAD. The objective of this study was to develop a brief self-report scale to identify probable cases of GAD and evaluate its reliability and validity. A criterion-standard study was performed in 15 primary care clinics in the United States from November 2004 through June 2005. Of a total of 2740 adult patients completing a study questionnaire, 965 patients had a telephone interview with a mental health professional within 1 week. For criterion and construct validity, GAD self-report scale diagnoses were compared with independent diagnoses made by mental health professionals; functional status measures; disability days; and health care use. A 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7) had good reliability, as well as criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity. A cut point was identified that optimized sensitivity (89%) and specificity (82%). Increasing scores on the scale were strongly associated with multiple domains of functional impairment (all 6 Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey scales and disability days). Although GAD and depression symptoms frequently co-occurred, factor analysis confirmed them as distinct dimensions. Moreover, GAD and depression symptoms had differing but independent effects on functional impairment and disability. There was good agreement between self-report and interviewer-administered versions of the scale. The GAD-7 is a valid and efficient tool for screening for GAD and assessing its severity in clinical practice and research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

            While considerable attention has focused on improving the detection of depression, assessment of severity is also important in guiding treatment decisions. Therefore, we examined the validity of a brief, new measure of depression severity. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day). The PHQ-9 was completed by 6,000 patients in 8 primary care clinics and 7 obstetrics-gynecology clinics. Construct validity was assessed using the 20-item Short-Form General Health Survey, self-reported sick days and clinic visits, and symptom-related difficulty. Criterion validity was assessed against an independent structured mental health professional (MHP) interview in a sample of 580 patients. As PHQ-9 depression severity increased, there was a substantial decrease in functional status on all 6 SF-20 subscales. Also, symptom-related difficulty, sick days, and health care utilization increased. Using the MHP reinterview as the criterion standard, a PHQ-9 score > or =10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represented mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively. Results were similar in the primary care and obstetrics-gynecology samples. In addition to making criteria-based diagnoses of depressive disorders, the PHQ-9 is also a reliable and valid measure of depression severity. These characteristics plus its brevity make the PHQ-9 a useful clinical and research tool.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The PHQ-9

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Psychol Med
                Psychol Med
                PSM
                Psychological Medicine
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                0033-2917
                1469-8978
                October 2022
                12 January 2021
                : 52
                : 13
                : 2794-2804
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Researcher; Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London , London, England
                [2 ]Professor of Mental Health; School of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University , Edinburgh, Scotland
                [3 ]Clinical & Health Psychologist; Rivers Centre for Traumatic Stress, NHS Lothian , Edinburgh, Scotland
                [4 ]Research Assistant; Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London , London, England
                [5 ]Clinical Reader in Forensic Psychiatry; Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London , London, England
                [6 ]Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist; HMP Wandsworth, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust , London, England
                [7 ]Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist; London and South East NHS Veterans’ Mental Health Service, Camden and Islington NHS Trust; HMP Wandsworth, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust , London, England
                Author notes
                Author for correspondence: Emma Facer-Irwin, E-mail: emma.facer-irwin@ 123456kcl.ac.uk , ef19033@ 123456essex.ac.uk
                [*]

                Present Address: Trainee Clinical Psychologist in the Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, UK.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3709-5141
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3002-0630
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5909-203X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-9638
                Article
                S0033291720004936
                10.1017/S0033291720004936
                9647511
                33431085
                a736a89e-9d94-4e14-ae17-4d6ac60bdcf0
                © The Author(s) 2021

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 July 2020
                : 24 November 2020
                : 25 November 2020
                Page count
                Tables: 4, References: 48, Pages: 11
                Categories
                Original Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                complex posttraumatic stress disorder,icd-11,prison,trauma-informed care

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content27

                Cited by12

                Most referenced authors852