Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pesticide Uptake Across the Amphibian Dermis Through Soil and Overspray Exposures.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          For terrestrial amphibians, accumulation of pesticides through dermal contact is a primary route of exposure in agricultural landscapes and may be contributing to widespread amphibian declines. To show pesticide transfer across the amphibian dermis at permitted label application rates, our study was designed to measure pesticide body burdens after two simulated exposure scenarios. We compared direct exposures, where amphibians were present when spraying occurred, to indirect exposures, where amphibians were exposed to soils after pesticide application. During summer 2012, we reared barking (Hyla gratiosa) and green treefrogs (H. cinerea) through 60-90 days post-metamorphosis at a United States Environmental Protection Agency research laboratory. We tested exposure for 8 h to five pesticide active ingredients (imidacloprid, atrazine, triadimefon, fipronil, or pendimethalin) in glass aquaria lined with soil in the laboratory. We quantified total pesticide body burden and soil concentrations using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. All individuals in both treatments had measurable body burdens at the end of the study. A randomized block design analysis of variance (n = 18) showed that body burdens (p = 0.03) and bioconcentration factors (BCFs) (p = 0.01) were significantly greater in the direct overspray treatment relative to the indirect soil spray treatment for both species and tested pesticides. BCFs ranged from 0.1 to 1.16 and from 0.013 to 0.78 in the direct and indirect treatments, respectively. Our study shows dermal uptake for multiple pesticides from both direct spray and indirect soil exposures and provides empirical support for the degree to which terrestrial phase amphibians have higher body burdens after overspray pesticide exposure.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
          Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology
          Springer Nature
          1432-0703
          0090-4341
          Nov 2015
          : 69
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 960 College Station Road, Athens, GA, 30605, USA. rvanmeter2@washcoll.edu.
          [2 ] Washington College, Toll Science Center SG20, Chestertown, MD, 21620, USA. rvanmeter2@washcoll.edu.
          [3 ] Student Services Authority Contractor, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 960 College Station Road, Athens, GA, 30605, USA.
          [4 ] Ecosystems Research Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 960 College Station Road, Athens, GA, 30605, USA.
          Article
          10.1007/s00244-015-0183-2
          10.1007/s00244-015-0183-2
          26135301
          a5d4bf30-f5eb-46ca-a18e-38b8a4889da3
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article