10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bacterial Load of the Teat Apex Skin and Associated Factors at Herd Level

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          Bacterial load on the teat apex of dairy cows that causes intramammary infections is to a large extent due to environmental impacts. The aim of our study was to describe factors at herd level that are associated with bacterial load of environmental mastitis pathogens on the teat end’s skin. On visits to 31 dairy farms over a one-year period, farm conditions were documented, and environmental bacterial loads were examined. We found seasonal fluctuations and direct correlations between the temperature–humidity index (THI) in the barn and the bacterial load at the teat end. Significantly more environmental mastitis pathogens were found in herds with a high percentage of normal and slightly rough teat ends. The time since the last fresh bedding was added to the cubicles, as well as the frequency in which cubicles were cleaned, also affect the pathogen load on the teat skin. Pre-cleaning teats before milking as well as post-dipping after milking showed a decreasing effect of teat-skin bacterial load at the herd level.

          Abstract

          In order to reduce antimicrobial treatment and prevent environmental mastitis, the aim of the present study was to investigate associations between herd level factors and microbial load on teat ends with environmental mastitis pathogens. Quarterly farm visits of 31 dairy farms over a one-year period were used for statistical analysis. During each farm visit, teat-skin swabs, bedding and air samples were taken and management practices and herd parameters were documented. Total mesophilic bacteria, esculin-positive streptococci and coliform bacteria were examined in the laboratory procedures from teat skin and environmental samples. Esculin-positive streptococci and coliform bacteria on teat ends increased with high temperature–humidity indices (THI) in the barn during the spring and summer. Significantly more coliform bacteria on teat ends were found in herds with an increased percentage of normal or slightly rough teat ends. Cleaning cubicles more frequently, pre-cleaning teats before milking as well as post-dipping them after milking had a decreasing effect of teat-skin load with total mesophilic and coliform bacteria at the herd level. To conclude, teat-skin bacterial load with environmental pathogens is subject to fluctuations and can be influenced by aspects of farm hygiene.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds.

          Mastitis is the most prevalent production disease in dairy herds world-wide and is responsible for several production effects. Milk yield and composition can be affected by a more or less severe short-term depression and, in case of no cure, by a long-acting effect, and, sometimes, an overlapping effect to the next lactation. Summary values in the literature for losses of milk production were proposed at 375 kg for a clinical case (5% at the lactation level) and at 0.5 kg per 2-fold increase of crude SCC of a cow. Due to the withdrawal period after treatment, composition changes in milk can almost be neglected in economic calculations. Lethality rate for clinical mastitis is very low on the average, while anticipated culling occurs more frequently after clinical and subclinical mastitis (relative risk between 1.5 and 5.0). The economics of mastitis needs to be addressed at the farm level and, per se, depends on local and regional epidemiological, managerial and economic conditions. To assess the direct economic impact of mastitis, costs (i.e. extra resource use) and losses (i.e. reduced revenues) have to be aggregated. To support decision making for udder health control, it is necessary to use a marginal approach, based on the comparison of the losses avoided and the additional costs of modified plans, compared to the existing ones.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            New sampler for the collection, sizing, and enumeration of viable airborne particles.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Economic aspects of mastitis: new developments.

              Good udder health is not only important for the dairy farmer but, because of increasing interest of consumers in the way dairy products are produced, also for the dairy production chain as a whole. An important role of veterinarians is in advising on production diseases such as mastitis. A large part of this advice is given around the planning of management to maintain or improve the udder health status of a farm. Mastitis is a costly disease, due to losses (a reduction of output due to mastitis) and expenditure (additional inputs to reduce the level of mastitis). Worldwide, published estimates of the economic losses of clinical mastitis range from €61 to €97 per cow on a farm, with large differences between farms, e.g. in The Netherlands, losses due to clinical and subclinical mastitis varied between €17 and €198 per cow per year. Moreover, farmers tended to underestimate these costs. This indicates that for a large proportion of farms there are many avoidable losses. In order to provide good support to farmers' decision-making, it is important to describe the mastitis setting not only in terms of disease, e.g. incidence of clinical mastitis, but also in monetary terms; and to make good decisions, it is necessary to provide the dairy farmer with information on the additional expenditure and reduced losses associated with alternative decisions. Six out of 18 preventive measures were shown to have a positive nett benefit, viz blanket use of dry-cow therapy, keeping cows standing after milking, back-flushing of the milk cluster after milking a cow with clinical mastitis, application of a treatment protocol, washing dirty udders, and the use of milkers' gloves. For those measures that included a large amount of routine labour or investment, the reduced losses did not outweigh the additional expenditure. The advisor cannot expect that measures that are cost-effective are always implemented. Reasons for this are the objectives of the dairy farmer can be other than maximisation of profit, resources to improve the mastitis situation compete with other fields of management, risk involved with the decision, economic behaviour of the dairy farmer, and valuation of the cost factors by the dairy farmer. For all decision-makers this means that, although financial incentives do have an effect on the management of mastitis, it is not always sufficient to show the economic benefits of improved management to induce an improvement of management of mastitis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Animals (Basel)
                Animals (Basel)
                animals
                Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
                MDPI
                2076-2615
                14 September 2020
                September 2020
                : 10
                : 9
                : 1647
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Microbiology, Faculty II, Hannover University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Heisterbergallee 10a, D-30453 Hannover, Germany; maria_hohmann@ 123456web.de (M.-F.H.); nicole.wente@ 123456hs-hannover.de (N.W.); yanchao.zhang@ 123456hs-hannover.de (Y.Z.)
                [2 ]Section for Production, Nutrition and Health, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 2, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7513-9478
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4028-9326
                Article
                animals-10-01647
                10.3390/ani10091647
                7552317
                32937832
                a54beb9a-890d-4571-bced-aba5b03185c1
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 20 August 2020
                : 10 September 2020
                Categories
                Article

                teat end colonization,mastitis pathogens,wet-dry swab technique,bedding,season

                Comments

                Comment on this article