12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Religiosity and Resilience: Cognitive Reappraisal and Coping Self-Efficacy Mediate the Link between Religious Coping and Well-Being

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Qualitative evidence points to the engagement of religious coping strategies when facing adversity, and evidence also highlights the effectiveness of cognitive reappraisal in reducing the impact of distressing emotions on well-being. It has been suggested that religious practices could facilitate the use of reappraisal, by promoting reframing of negative cognitions to alter emotional states. However, the link between religiosity and reappraisal in influencing resilience against symptoms of distress is not known. The current study ( N = 203) examined connections among these aspects, using self-reported measures of religious coping, habitual use of specific coping strategies (positive reappraisal) and perceived confidence in using coping strategies, as well as questionnaires assessing symptoms of distress (anxiety and depression). Results point to a mediating role of reappraisal and coping self-efficacy as part of mechanisms that provide a protecting role of religious coping against emotional distress. These results provide novel scientific evidence further validating millennia-old traditional coping practices and shed light on psychological factors influencing adaptive behaviors that promote increased resilience, reduce symptoms of distress, and maintain emotional well-being. These findings inform general counseling practices and counseling of religious clients alike.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          An inventory for measuring depression.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE.

            Studies of coping in applied settings often confront the need to minimize time demands on participants. The problem of participant response burden is exacerbated further by the fact that these studies typically are designed to test multiple hypotheses with the same sample, a strategy that entails the use of many time-consuming measures. Such research would benefit from a brief measure of coping assessing several responses known to be relevant to effective and ineffective coping. This article presents such a brief form of a previously published measure called the COPE inventory (Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, 1989), which has proven to be useful in health-related research. The Brief COPE omits two scales of the full COPE, reduces others to two items per scale, and adds one scale. Psychometric properties of the Brief COPE are reported, derived from a sample of adults participating in a study of the process of recovery after Hurricane Andrew.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

              Five studies tested two general hypotheses: Individuals differ in their use of emotion regulation strategies such as reappraisal and suppression, and these individual differences have implications for affect, well-being, and social relationships. Study 1 presents new measures of the habitual use of reappraisal and suppression. Study 2 examines convergent and discriminant validity. Study 3 shows that reappraisers experience and express greater positive emotion and lesser negative emotion, whereas suppressors experience and express lesser positive emotion, yet experience greater negative emotion. Study 4 indicates that using reappraisal is associated with better interpersonal functioning, whereas using suppression is associated with worse interpersonal functioning. Study 5 shows that using reappraisal is related positively to well-being, whereas using suppression is related negatively.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                fdolcos@illinois.edu , http://dolcoslab.beckman.illinois.edu/
                sdolcos@illinois.edu
                Journal
                J Relig Health
                J Relig Health
                Journal of Religion and Health
                Springer US (New York )
                0022-4197
                1573-6571
                7 January 2021
                : 1-14
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.35403.31, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9991, Psychology Department, , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, ; Urbana, IL 61820 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.35403.31, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9991, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science & Technology, , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, ; Urbana, IL 61801 USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.35403.31, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9991, Neuroscience Program, , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, ; Urbana, IL 61801 USA
                Article
                1160
                10.1007/s10943-020-01160-y
                7790337
                33415601
                a51a1d7e-98d5-42d8-8413-57599528a76d
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 7 December 2020
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Sociology
                emotion regulation,cognitive control of emotion,belief,affect,emotion-cognition interactions

                Comments

                Comment on this article