9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Women’s experience of agency and respect in maternity care by type of insurance in California

      research-article
      1 , * , 2 , 1
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Public insurance (Medicaid) covered 42% of all U.S. births in 2018. This paper describes and analyzes the self-reported experiences of women with Medicaid versus commercial insurance relating to autonomy, control and respectful treatment in maternity care.

          Methods

          The sampling frame for the Listening to Mothers in California survey was drawn from 2016 California birth certificate files. The 30-minute survey had a 55% response rate. A secondary multivariable analysis of results from the survey included 2,318 women with commercial private insurance (1,087) or public (Medi-Cal) (1,231) coverage. Results were weighted and were representative of all births in 2016 in California. The multivariable analysis of variables related to maternal agency included engagement in decision making regarding interventions such as vaginal birth after cesarean and episiotomy, feeling pressured to have interventions and sense of fair treatment. We examined their relationship to insurance status adjusted for maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, nativity and attitude toward birth as well as type of prenatal provider, type of birth attendant and pregnancy complications.

          Results

          Women with Medi-Cal had a demographic profile distinct from those with commercial insurance. In multivariable analysis, women with Medi-Cal reported less control over their maternity care experience than women with commercial insurance, including less choice of prenatal provider (AOR 1.61 95%C.I. 1.20, 2.17), or a vaginal birth after cesarean (AOR 2.93 95%C.I. 1.49, 5.73). Mothers on Medi-Cal were also less likely to be consulted before experiencing an episiotomy (AOR 0.30 95%C.I. 0.09, 0.94). They were more likely to report feeling pressure to have a primary cesarean (AOR 2.54 95%C.I. 1.55, 4.16) and less likely to be encouraged by staff to make their own decisions (AOR 0.63 95%C.I. 0.47, 0.85).

          Conclusions

          Childbearing women with public insurance in California clearly and consistently reported less opportunity to choose their care than women with private insurance. These inequities are a call to action for increased accountability and quality improvement relating to care of the many childbearing women with Medicaid coverage.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide.

          On the continuum of maternal health care, two extreme situations exist: too little, too late (TLTL) and too much, too soon (TMTS). TLTL describes care with inadequate resources, below evidence-based standards, or care withheld or unavailable until too late to help. TLTL is an underlying problem associated with high maternal mortality and morbidity. TMTS describes the routine over-medicalisation of normal pregnancy and birth. TMTS includes unnecessary use of non-evidence-based interventions, as well as use of interventions that can be life saving when used appropriately, but harmful when applied routinely or overused. As facility births increase, so does the recognition that TMTS causes harm and increases health costs, and often concentrates disrespect and abuse. Although TMTS is typically ascribed to high-income countries and TLTL to low-income and middle-income ones, social and health inequities mean these extremes coexist in many countries. A global approach to quality and equitable maternal health, supporting the implementation of respectful, evidence-based care for all, is urgently needed. We present a systematic review of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for routine antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care, categorising them as recommended, recommended only for clinical indications, and not recommended. We also present prevalence data from middle-income countries for specific clinical practices, which demonstrate TLTL and increasing TMTS. Health-care providers and health systems need to ensure that all women receive high-quality, evidence-based, equitable and respectful care. The right amount of care needs to be offered at the right time, and delivered in a manner that respects, protects, and promotes human rights.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Site of delivery contribution to black-white severe maternal morbidity disparity

            BACKGROUND The black-white maternal mortality disparity is the largest disparity among all conventional population perinatal health measures and the mortality gap between black and white women in New York City has nearly doubled in recent years. For every maternal death, 100 women experience severe maternal morbidity, a life threatening diagnosis or undergo a lifesaving procedure during their delivery hospitalization. Like maternal mortality, severe maternal morbidity is more common among black than white women. A significant portion of maternal morbidity and mortality is preventable making quality of care in hospitals a critical lever for improving outcomes. Hospital variation in risk-adjusted severe maternal morbidity rates exists. The extent to which variation in hospital performance on severe maternal morbidity rates contributes to black-white disparities in New York City hospitals has not been studied. OBJECTIVE We examined the extent to which black-white differences in severe maternal morbidity rates in New York City hospitals can be explained by differences in the hospitals in which black and white women deliver. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a population-based study using linked 2011–2013 New York City discharge and birth certificate datasets (N= 353,773 deliveries) to examine black-white differences in severe maternal morbidity rates in New York City hospitals. Mixed-effects logistic regression with a random hospital-specific intercept was used to generate risk-standardized severe maternal morbidity rates for each hospital (N=40). We then assessed differences in the distributions of black and white deliveries among these hospitals. RESULTS Severe maternal morbidity occurred in 8,882 deliveries (2.5%) and was higher among black than white women (4.2% vs. 1.5%, p<.001). After adjustment for patient characteristics and comorbidities the risk remained elevated for black women (odds ratio=2.02; 95% CI 1.89–2.17). Risk-standardized severe maternal morbidity rates among New York City hospitals ranged from 0.8 to 5.7 per 100 deliveries. White deliveries were more likely to be delivered in low morbidity hospitals: 65% of white versus 23% of black deliveries occurred in hospitals in the lowest tertile for morbidity. We estimated that black-white differences in delivery location may contribute as much as 47.7% of the racial disparity in severe maternal morbidity rates in New York City. CONCLUSION Black mothers are more likely to deliver at higher risk-standardized severe maternal morbidity hospitals than are white mothers, contributing to black-white disparities. More research is needed to understand the attributes of high performing hospitals and to share best practices among hospitals.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Pregnancy: An Underutilized Window of Opportunity to Improve Long-term Maternal and Infant Health—An Appeal for Continuous Family Care and Interdisciplinary Communication

              Physiologic adaptations during pregnancy unmask a woman’s predisposition to diseases. Complications are increasingly predicted by first-trimester algorithms, amplify a pre-existing maternal phenotype and accelerate risks for chronic diseases in the offspring up to adulthood (Barker hypothesis). Recent evidence suggests that vice versa, pregnancy diseases also indicate maternal and even grandparent’s risks for chronic diseases (reverse Barker hypothesis). Pub-Med and Embase were reviewed for Mesh terms “fetal programming” and “pregnancy complications combined with maternal disease” until January 2017. Studies linking pregnancy complications to future cardiovascular, metabolic, and thrombotic risks for mother and offspring were reviewed. Women with a history of miscarriage, fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, preterm delivery, obesity, excessive gestational weight gain, gestational diabetes, subfertility, and thrombophilia more frequently demonstrate with echocardiographic abnormalities, higher fasting insulin, deviating lipids or clotting factors and show defective endothelial function. Thrombophilia hints to thrombotic risks in later life. Pregnancy abnormalities correlate with future cardiovascular and metabolic complications and earlier mortality. Conversely, women with a normal pregnancy have lower rates of subsequent diseases than the general female population creating the term: “Pregnancy as a window for future health.” Although the placenta works as a gatekeeper, many pregnancy complications may lead to sickness and earlier death in later life when the child becomes an adult. The epigenetic mechanisms and the mismatch between pre- and postnatal life have created the term “fetal origin of adult disease.” Up to now, the impact of cardiovascular, metabolic, or thrombotic risk profiles has been investigated separately for mother and child. In this manuscript, we strive to illustrate the consequences for both, fetus and mother within a cohesive perspective and thus try to demonstrate the complex interrelationship of genetics and epigenetics for long-term health of societies and future generations. Maternal–fetal medicine specialists should have a key role in the prevention of non-communicable diseases by implementing a framework for patient consultation and interdisciplinary networks. Health-care providers and policy makers should increasingly invest in a stratified primary prevention and follow-up to reduce the increasing number of manifest cardiovascular and metabolic diseases and to prevent waste of health-care resources.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                27 July 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 7
                : e0235262
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
                [2 ] National Partnership for Women & Families, Washington, DC, United States of America
                Florida State University College of Medicine, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5411-3033
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0006-347X
                Article
                PONE-D-20-02142
                10.1371/journal.pone.0235262
                7384608
                32716927
                a460c6d9-c98a-4df6-9df7-8540ef510413
                © 2020 Declercq et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 23 January 2020
                : 11 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001018, California Health Care Foundation;
                Award Recipient :
                ED and CS completed the research as part of grants from the California Health Care Foundation ( https://www.chcf.org/) and the Yellow Chair Foundation for the Listening to Mothers in California study. Funders played no role in this research study. The Yellow Chair Foundation is a private foundation that does not maintain a website.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Birth
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Birth
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Health Economics
                Health Insurance
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Economics
                Health Insurance
                Engineering and Technology
                Management Engineering
                Risk Management
                Insurance
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pediatrics
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                North America
                United States
                California
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Birth
                Labor and Delivery
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Birth
                Labor and Delivery
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Custom metadata
                The data from the Listening to Mothers in California Survey are available from the Odum Institute at the University of North California (DOI: 10.15139/S3/3KW1DB). The birth certificate variables will not be made available without a separate application to the state of California for permission to use them. Requests for access to birth certificate data can be made to the California Vital Statistics Advisory Committee ( https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CHSI/Pages/Vital-Statistics-Advisory-committee-Meeting-Information.aspx). As described in the paper, a variable based on an actual payment from the state Medi-Cal office was used for a more precise operationalization of our insurance variable. Permission to do so can be sought from Department of Health Care Services Division ( https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/pages/contacts.aspx). While the survey data that is at the foundation of this article is publicly available, requests to link that data to California state data from the birth certificate or Medi-Cal files would require multiple applications and may take an extended period of time to obtain permissions.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article