12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cast OFF-2: 1 week of plaster cast immobilization for non-reduced distal radius fractures—a study protocol for an implementation study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The distal radius fracture (DRF) is a common fracture, with the majority of these fractures being stable. Of all diagnosed fractures, 17% is a DRF, of which a large part is extra-articular and one-third is non-displaced. There is a large variation in treatment advisements for non-reduced DRF. Four to 5 weeks of immobilization is often the usual practice. Existing evidence shows that 1 week of immobilization is safe and does not lead to an increase in secondary displacement. Additionally, shorter immobilization periods may lead to less outpatient clinic visits and less home care for elderly people and may lead to earlier return to work and other social activities. Therefore, shorter immobilization periods for non-reduced distal radius fractures may also prove to be cost-effective.

          In this study, we aim to successfully implement 1 week of plaster cast immobilization for non-reduced distal radius fractures in twelve medical centers and to evaluate the functional outcome and cost-effectiveness.

          Methods

          This study will be performed using a multicenter randomized stepped wedge design in 12 centers. We aim to include in the study 440 patients with an isolated non-reduced DRF between the age of 18 and 85 years old. The patients in the intervention group will be treated with plaster cast immobilization for 1 week. Acceptability of the study protocol, patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, complications, pain catastrophizing score, pain and patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness will be measured. The total follow-up will be 12 months.

          Discussion

          The strength of this study is the combination of implementing 1 week of plaster cast immobilization for non-reduced DRF and the evaluation of functional outcome, acceptability of the study protocol, and cost-effectiveness in actual practice.

          Trial registration

          Netherlands Trial Register NL9278. Registered on 17 February 2021

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool.

            The goal of this study was to develop a reliable and valid tool for quantifying patient-rated wrist pain and disability. Survey, tool development, reliability, and validity study. Upper extremity unit. One hundred members of the International Wrist Investigators were surveyed by mail to assist in development of the scale. Patients with distal radius (n = 64) or scaphoid (n = 35) fractures were enrolled in a reliability study, and 101 patients with distal radius fractures were enrolled in a validity study. Information from the expert survey, biomechanical literature, and patient interviews was used as a basis for item generation and definition of structural limitations for a scale that would be practical in the clinic. Patients with distal radius or scaphoid fractures completed the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) on two occasions to determine test-retest reliability. Patients with distal radius fractures (n = 101) completed the PRWE and the SF-36 and were tested with traditional impairment measures at baseline and at two, three, and six months after fracture to determine construct and criterion validity. Reliability coefficients (ICCs) and validity correlations (Pearson product moment correlations). Patient opinions on pain and on ability to do activities of daily living and work were thought to be the most important dimensions to include in subjective outcome tools. Brevity and simplicity were seen as essential in the clinic environment. A fifteen-item questionnaire (the PRWE) was designed to measure wrist pain and disability. Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICCs > 0.90). Validity assessment demonstrated that the instrument detected significant differences over time (p < 0.01) and was appropriately correlated with alternate forms of assessing parameters of pain and disability. The PRWE provides a brief, reliable, and valid measure of patient-rated pain and disability.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              [EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D): an instrument for measuring quality of life].

              The aim of this paper was to provide a detailed description of the EuroQol- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) useful for those member of staff in rehabilitation setting who wish to use it properly. EQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The answers given to ED-5D permit to find 243 unique health states or can be converted into EQ-5D index an utility scores anchored at 0 for death and 1 for perfect health. The EQ-5D questionnaire also includes a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), by which respondents can report their perceived health status with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status). Finally the specific utility (in clinical and research setting) of each one of them is discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                emily.boersma@radboudumc.nl
                erik.vandekrol@radboudumc.nl
                tjarda.tromp@radboudumc.nl
                ria.nijhuis-vandersanden@radboudumc.nl
                michael.edwards@radboudumc.nl
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                19 December 2021
                19 December 2021
                2021
                : 22
                : 936
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.10417.33, ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, ; route 618, P.O. Box 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands
                [2 ]GRID grid.10417.33, ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, , Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, ; Nijmegen, the Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5947-5316
                Article
                5889
                10.1186/s13063-021-05889-z
                8684679
                34924017
                9da131d9-0794-4094-9704-3c2221a1c89a
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 4 April 2021
                : 28 November 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013769, Orthopaedic Trauma Association;
                Award ID: 5581
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Medicine
                distal radius fracture,plaster cast immobilization,one-week immobilization,implementation study

                Comments

                Comment on this article