0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Logistic regression analysis of the value of biomarkers, clinical symptoms, and imaging examinations in COVID-19 for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection

      research-article
      , MPH a , , MM a , , MPH a , , MM a , , MPH a , * ,
      Medicine
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      COVID-19, detection rate, logistic regression analysis

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acid detection provides a direct basis for diagnosing Coronavirus Disease 2019. However, nucleic acid test false-negative results are common in practice and may lead to missed diagnosis. Certain biomarkers, clinical symptoms, and imaging examinations are related to SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection and potential predictors. We examined nucleic acid test results, biomarkers, clinical symptoms, and imaging examination data for 116 confirmed cases and asymptomatic infections in Zhuhai, China. Patients were divided into nucleic acid-positive and -false-negative groups. Predictive values of biomarkers, symptoms, and imaging for the nucleic acid-positive rate were calculated by Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operators regression analysis and binary logistic regression analysis, and areas under the curve of these indicators were calculated. Hemoglobin (OR = 1.018, 95% CI: 1.006–1.030; P = .004) was higher in the respiratory tract-positive group than the nucleic acid-negative group, but platelets (OR = 0.996, 95% CI: 0.993–0.999; P = .021) and eosinophils (OR = 0.013, 95% CI: 0.001–0.253; P = .004) were lower; areas under the curve were 0.563, 0.614, and 0.642, respectively. Some biomarkers can predict SARS-CoV-2 viral nucleic acid detection rates in Coronavirus Disease 2019 and are potential auxiliary diagnostic tests.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dysregulation of immune response in patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China

          Abstract Background In December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan and rapidly spread throughout China. Methods Demographic and clinical data of all confirmed cases with COVID-19 on admission at Tongji Hospital from January 10 to February 12, 2020, were collected and analyzed. The data of laboratory examinations, including peripheral lymphocyte subsets, were analyzed and compared between severe and non-severe patients. Results Of the 452 patients with COVID-19 recruited, 286 were diagnosed as severe infection. The median age was 58 years and 235 were male. The most common symptoms were fever, shortness of breath, expectoration, fatigue, dry cough and myalgia. Severe cases tend to have lower lymphocytes counts, higher leukocytes counts and neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR), as well as lower percentages of monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils. Most of severe cases demonstrated elevated levels of infection-related biomarkers and inflammatory cytokines. The number of T cells significantly decreased, and more hampered in severe cases. Both helper T cells and suppressor T cells in patients with COVID-19 were below normal levels, and lower level of helper T cells in severe group. The percentage of naïve helper T cells increased and memory helper T cells decreased in severe cases. Patients with COVID-19 also have lower level of regulatory T cells, and more obviously damaged in severe cases. Conclusions The novel coronavirus might mainly act on lymphocytes, especially T lymphocytes. Surveillance of NLR and lymphocyte subsets is helpful in the early screening of critical illness, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The diagnostic and predictive role of NLR, d-NLR and PLR in COVID-19 patients

            Aim To accumulate evidence that indicates the key role played by virus-triggered inflammation in the 2019-novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) which emerged in Wuhan City and rapidly spread throughout China. Methods Age, neutrophil(NEU)-to-lymphocyte (LYM) ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte(MON) ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR), and C-reactive protein(CRP) of 93 patients with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 were investigated and compared. The receiver operating characteristic curve was applied to determine the thresholds for five bio-markers, and their prognostic values were assessed via the Kaplan–Meier curve and multivariate COX regression models. Results The median age was 46.4 years old, and 37cases were females. A total of 26.8% of patients had been to Wuhan, and 73.1% had contacted with people from Wuhan. Fever (83.8%) and cough (70.9%) were the two most common symptoms. Elevated NLR and age were significantly associated with illness severity. The binary logistic analysis identified elevated NLR (hazard risk [HR] 2.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.98–4.57) and age (HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.65–4.83) as independent factors for poor clinical outcome of COVID-19. NLR exhibited the largest area under the curve at 0.841, with the highest specificity (63.6%) and sensitivity (88%). Conclusions Elevated age and NLR can be considered independent biomarkers for indicating poor clinical outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Coagulopathy in COVID‐19

              Abstract The COVID‐19 pandemic has become an urgent issue in every country. Based on recent reports, the most severely ill patients present with coagulopathy, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)‐like massive intravascular clot formation is frequently seen in this cohort. Therefore, coagulation tests may be considered useful to discriminate severe cases of COVID‐19. The clinical presentation of COVID‐19‐associated coagulopathy is organ dysfunction primarily, while hemorrhagic events are less frequent. Changes in hemostatic biomarkers represented by increase in D‐dimer and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products indicate the essence of coagulopathy is massive fibrin formation. In comparison with bacterial‐sepsis‐associated coagulopathy/DIC, prolongation of prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time, and decrease in antithrombin activity is less frequent and thrombocytopenia is relatively uncommon in COVID‐19. The mechanisms of the coagulopathy are not fully elucidated, however. It is speculated that the dysregulated immune responses orchestrated by inflammatory cytokines, lymphocyte cell‐death, hypoxia, and endothelial damage are involved. Bleeding tendency is uncommon, but the incidence of thrombosis in COVID‐19 and the adequacy of current recommendations regarding standard venous thromboembolic dosing are uncertain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                MD
                Medicine
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0025-7974
                1536-5964
                10 May 2024
                10 May 2024
                : 103
                : 19
                : e38186
                Affiliations
                [a ]Zhuhai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence: Feng Ruan, Zhuhai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China (e-mail: zhcdcyjb@ 123456163.com ).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6971-2961
                Article
                MD-D-23-11871 00003
                10.1097/MD.0000000000038186
                11081620
                38728447
                9d68d250-bf20-4309-a207-af3182dd39b3
                Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 03 January 2024
                : 16 April 2024
                : 18 April 2024
                Categories
                4400
                Research Article
                Observational Study
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                covid-19,detection rate,logistic regression analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article