9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association between multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) and pre-operative delirium in older patients with hip fracture

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pre-operative delirium may cause delay in surgical intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture. Also it has been associated with higher risk of post-surgical complications and worst functional outcomes. Aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate whether the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) at hospital admission was associated with pre-operative delirium in older individuals with hip fracture who are deemed to require surgical intervention. Consecutive older patients (≥ 65 years) with hip fracture underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment to calculate the MPI at hospital admission. According to previously established cut-offs, MPI was expressed in three grades, i.e. MPI-1 (low-risk), MPI-2 (moderate-risk) and MPI-3 (high risk of mortality). Pre-operative delirium was assessed using the four ‘A’s Test. Out of 244 older patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture, 104 subjects (43%) received a diagnosis of delirium. Overall, the incidence of delirium before surgery was significantly higher in patients with more severe MPI score at admission. Higher MPI grade (MPI-3) was independently associated with higher risk of pre-operative delirium (OR 2.45, CI 1.21–4.96). Therefore, the MPI at hospital admission might help in early identification of older patients with hip fracture at risk for pre-operative delirium.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

          Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Cumulative illness rating scale.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                alberto.pilotto@galliera.it
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                8 October 2022
                8 October 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 16920
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.450697.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 8650, Department of Geriatric Care, OrthoGeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Frailty Area, , E.O. Galliera Hospital, ; Via Mura delle Cappuccine 16, 35121 Genoa, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.7644.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0120 3326, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Clinica Medica e Geriatria “Cesare Frugoni”, , University of Bari Aldo Moro, ; Bari, Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.450697.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 8650, Orthopedic Unit, Department of Geriatric Care, OrthoGeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Frailty Area, , E.O. Galliera Hospital, ; Genoa, Italy
                [4 ]GRID grid.450697.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 8650, Clinical Trial Unit, Scientific Directorate, , E.O. Galliera Hospital, ; Genoa, Italy
                [5 ]GRID grid.411482.a, Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, , University Hospital of Parma, ; Parma, Italy
                Article
                20734
                10.1038/s41598-022-20734-2
                9547845
                36209284
                9d2cab25-45bc-4cc8-aa9f-bb1deb1e759c
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 9 November 2021
                : 19 September 2022
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Uncategorized
                neurology,risk factors,bone
                Uncategorized
                neurology, risk factors, bone

                Comments

                Comment on this article