2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How to tackle health literacy problems in chronic kidney disease patients? A systematic review to identify promising intervention targets and strategies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Limited health literacy (LHL) is associated with multiple adverse health outcomes in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Interventions are needed to improve this situation, but evidence on intervention targets and strategies is lacking. This systematic review aims to identify potential targets and strategies by summarizing the evidence on: (i) patient- and system-level factors potentially mediating the relation between LHL and health outcomes; and (ii) the effectiveness of health literacy interventions customized to CKD patients.

          Methods

          We performed a systematic review of peer-reviewed research articles in Medline, Embase and Web of Science, 2009–19. We assessed the quality of the studies and conducted a best-evidence synthesis.

          Results

          We identified 860 publications and included 48 studies. Most studies were of low quality ( n = 26) and focused on dialysis and transplantation ( n = 38). We found strong evidence for an association of LHL with smoking and having a suboptimal transplantation process. Evidence was weak for associations between LHL and a variety of factors related to self-care management ( n = 25), utilization of care ( n = 23), patient–provider interaction ( n = 8) and social context ( n = 5). Six interventions were aimed at improving knowledge, decision-making and health behaviours, but evidence for their effectiveness was weak.

          Conclusions

          Study heterogeneity, low quality and focus on kidney failure largely impede the identification of intervention targets and strategies for LHL. More and higher quality studies in earlier CKD stages are needed to unravel how LHL leads to worse health outcomes, and to identify targets and strategies to prevent disease deterioration. Healthcare organizations need to develop and evaluate efforts to support LHL patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references95

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

            Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health burden with a high economic cost to health systems and is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). All stages of CKD are associated with increased risks of cardiovascular morbidity, premature mortality, and/or decreased quality of life. CKD is usually asymptomatic until later stages and accurate prevalence data are lacking. Thus we sought to determine the prevalence of CKD globally, by stage, geographical location, gender and age. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies estimating CKD prevalence in general populations was conducted through literature searches in 8 databases. We assessed pooled data using a random effects model. Of 5,842 potential articles, 100 studies of diverse quality were included, comprising 6,908,440 patients. Global mean(95%CI) CKD prevalence of 5 stages 13·4%(11·7–15·1%), and stages 3–5 was 10·6%(9·2–12·2%). Weighting by study quality did not affect prevalence estimates. CKD prevalence by stage was Stage-1 (eGFR>90+ACR>30): 3·5% (2·8–4·2%); Stage-2 (eGFR 60–89+ACR>30): 3·9% (2·7–5·3%); Stage-3 (eGFR 30–59): 7·6% (6·4–8·9%); Stage-4 = (eGFR 29–15): 0·4% (0·3–0·5%); and Stage-5 (eGFR<15): 0·1% (0·1–0·1%). CKD has a high global prevalence with a consistent estimated global CKD prevalence of between 11 to 13% with the majority stage 3. Future research should evaluate intervention strategies deliverable at scale to delay the progression of CKD and improve CVD outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives.

              Chronic kidney disease is defined as a reduced glomerular filtration rate, increased urinary albumin excretion, or both, and is an increasing public health issue. Prevalence is estimated to be 8-16% worldwide. Complications include increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, kidney-disease progression, acute kidney injury, cognitive decline, anaemia, mineral and bone disorders, and fractures. Worldwide, diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of chronic kidney disease, but in some regions other causes, such as herbal and environmental toxins, are more common. The poorest populations are at the highest risk. Screening and intervention can prevent chronic kidney disease, and where management strategies have been implemented the incidence of end-stage kidney disease has been reduced. Awareness of the disorder, however, remains low in many communities and among many physicians. Strategies to reduce burden and costs related to chronic kidney disease need to be included in national programmes for non-communicable diseases. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nephrol Dial Transplant
                Nephrol Dial Transplant
                ndt
                Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
                Oxford University Press
                0931-0509
                1460-2385
                July 2021
                22 December 2020
                22 December 2020
                : 36
                : 7
                : 1207-1221
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen , Groningen, The Netherlands
                [2 ] Institute for Applied Health Sciences, Coburg University of Applied Sciences and Arts , Coburg, Germany
                [3 ] Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen , Groningen, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Marco D. Boonstra; E-mail: M.D.Boonstra@ 123456umcg.nl
                Article
                gfaa273
                10.1093/ndt/gfaa273
                8237988
                33351936
                9a66c487-770a-4742-adae-5e263f32497f
                © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 31 March 2020
                : 20 August 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 15
                Funding
                Funded by: Dutch Kidney Foundation, DOI 10.13039/501100002997;
                Funded by: Behavioural and Social Research Call;
                Award ID: 17SWO06
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Clinical Research
                AcademicSubjects/MED00340
                AcademicSubjects/MED00340

                Nephrology
                chronic kidney disease,health literacy,intervention,systematic review
                Nephrology
                chronic kidney disease, health literacy, intervention, systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article