120
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The newly emergent human virus SARS-CoV-2 is resulting in high fatality rates and incapacitated health systems. Preventing further transmission is a priority. We analyzed key parameters of epidemic spread to estimate the contribution of different transmission routes and determine requirements for case isolation and contact-tracing needed to stop the epidemic. We conclude that viral spread is too fast to be contained by manual contact tracing, but could be controlled if this process was faster, more efficient and happened at scale. A contact-tracing App which builds a memory of proximity contacts and immediately notifies contacts of positive cases can achieve epidemic control if used by enough people. By targeting recommendations to only those at risk, epidemics could be contained without need for mass quarantines (‘lock-downs’) that are harmful to society. We discuss the ethical requirements for an intervention of this kind.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mathematical models of infectious disease transmission

          Key Points Mathematical analysis and modelling is an important part of infectious disease epidemiology. Application of mathematical models to disease surveillance data can be used to address both scientific hypotheses and disease-control policy questions. The link between the biology of an infectious disease, the process of transmission and the mathematics that are used to describe them is not always clear in published research. An understanding of this link is needed to critically interpret these publications and the policy recommendations and scientific conclusions that are contained within them. This Review describes the biology of the transmission process and how it can be represented mathematically. It shows how this representation leads to a mathematical model of infectious disease epidemics as a function of underlying disease natural history and ecology. The mathematical description of disease epidemics immediately leads to several useful results, including the expected size of an epidemic and the critical level that is needed for an intervention to achieve effective disease control. Statistical methods to fit mathematical models of disease surveillance data are outlined and the fundamental importance of the concept of likelihood is highlighted. The fit of mathematical models to surveillance data can provide estimates of key model parameters that determine a disease's natural history or the impact of an intervention, and are crucially dependent on the appropriate choice of mathematical model. The Review ends with four outstanding challenges in mathematical infectious disease epidemiology that are essential for progress in our understanding of the ecology and evolution of infectious diseases. This understanding could lead to improvements in disease control.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Effectiveness of Contact Tracing in Emerging Epidemics

            Background Contact tracing plays an important role in the control of emerging infectious diseases, but little is known yet about its effectiveness. Here we deduce from a generic mathematical model how effectiveness of tracing relates to various aspects of time, such as the course of individual infectivity, the (variability in) time between infection and symptom-based detection, and delays in the tracing process. In addition, the possibility of iteratively tracing of yet asymptomatic infecteds is considered. With these insights we explain why contact tracing was and will be effective for control of smallpox and SARS, only partially effective for foot-and-mouth disease, and likely not effective for influenza. Methods and Findings We investigate contact tracing in a model of an emerging epidemic that is flexible enough to use for most infections. We consider isolation of symptomatic infecteds as the basic scenario, and express effectiveness as the proportion of contacts that need to be traced for a reproduction ratio smaller than 1. We obtain general results for special cases, which are interpreted with respect to the likely success of tracing for influenza, smallpox, SARS, and foot-and-mouth disease epidemics. Conclusions We conclude that (1) there is no general predictive formula for the proportion to be traced as there is for the proportion to be vaccinated; (2) variability in time to detection is favourable for effective tracing; (3) tracing effectiveness need not be sensitive to the duration of the latent period and tracing delays; (4) iterative tracing primarily improves effectiveness when single-step tracing is on the brink of being effective.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              SARS-CoV Antibody Prevalence in All Hong Kong Patient Contacts

              A total of 1,068 asymptomatic close contacts of patients with severe acute respiratory (SARS) from the 2003 epidemic in Hong Kong were serologically tested, and 2 (0.19%) were positive for SARS coronavirus immunoglobulin G antibody. SARS rarely manifests as a subclinical infection, and at present, wild animal species are the only important natural reservoirs of the virus.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Science
                Science
                SCIENCE
                Science (New York, N.y.)
                American Association for the Advancement of Science
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                31 March 2020
                : eabb6936
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
                [2 ]Wellcome Centre for Ethics and the Humanities and Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
                [3 ]Oxford University NHS Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
                [4 ]Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
                Author notes
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                []Corresponding author. Email: christophe.fraser@ 123456bdi.ox.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7578-7301
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9847-8226
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7344-7071
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2807-1914
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7107-1656
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-4192
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2187-0550
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2399-9657
                Article
                abb6936
                10.1126/science.abb6936
                7164555
                32234805
                99f9a165-a76f-4e94-9b49-7459bc211695
                Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) .

                History
                : 11 March 2020
                : 27 March 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Award ID: INV-003680
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Award ID: OPP1175094
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Award ID: INV-003680
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013372, Wellcome Trust Centre for Mitochondrial Research;
                Award ID: ARTIC
                Funded by: Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities;
                Award ID: 203132/Z/16/Z
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                R-Articles
                Epidemiology

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article