9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genomic dissection of an extended phenotype: Oak galling by a cynipid gall wasp

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Galls are plant tissues whose development is induced by another organism for the inducer's benefit. 30,000 arthropod species induce galls, and in most cases the inducing effectors and target plant systems are unknown. Cynipid gall wasps are a speciose monophyletic radiation that induce structurally complex galls on oaks and other plants. We used a model system comprising the gall wasp Biorhiza pallida and the oak Quercus robur to characterise inducer and host plant gene expression at defined stages through the development of galled and ungalled plant tissues, and tested alternative hypotheses for the origin and type of galling effectors and plant metabolic pathways involved. Oak gene expression patterns diverged markedly during development of galled and normal buds. Young galls showed elevated expression of oak genes similar to legume root nodule Nod factor-induced early nodulin ( ENOD) genes and developmental parallels with oak buds. In contrast, mature galls showed substantially different patterns of gene expression to mature leaves. While most oak transcripts could be functionally annotated, many gall wasp transcripts of interest were novel. We found no evidence in the gall wasp for involvement of third-party symbionts in gall induction, for effector delivery using virus-like-particles, or for gallwasp expression of genes coding for plant hormones. Many differentially and highly expressed genes in young larvae encoded secretory peptides, which we hypothesise are effector proteins exported to plant tissues. Specifically, we propose that host arabinogalactan proteins and gall wasp chitinases interact in young galls to generate a somatic embryogenesis-like process in oak tissues surrounding the gall wasp larvae. Gall wasp larvae also expressed genes encoding multiple plant cell wall degrading enzymes (PCWDEs). These have functional orthologues in other gall inducing cynipids but not in figitid parasitoid sister groups, suggesting that they may be evolutionary innovations associated with cynipid gall induction.

          Author summary

          Plant galls are induced by organisms that manipulate host plant development to produce novel structures. The organisms involved range from mutualistic (such as nitrogen fixing bacteria) to parasitic. In the case of parasites, the gall benefits only the gall-inducing partner. A wide range of organisms can induce galls, but the processes involved are understood only for some bacterial and fungal galls. Cynipid gall wasps induce diverse and structurally complex galls, particularly on oaks ( Quercus). We used transcriptome and genome sequencing for one gall wasp and its host oak to identify genes active in gall development. On the plant side, when compared to normally developing bud tissues, young gall tissues showed elevated expression of loci similar to those found in nitrogen-fixing root nodules of leguminous plants. On the wasp side, we found no evidence for involvement of viruses or microorganisms carried by the insects in gall induction or delivery of inducing stimuli. We found that gall wasps express many genes whose products may be secreted to the host, including enzymes that degrade plant cell walls. Genome comparisons between galling and non-galling relatives showed cell wall-degrading enzymes are restricted to gall inducers, and hence potentially key components of a gall inducing lifestyle.

          Related collections

          Most cited references147

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Functional analysis of AHK1/ATHK1 and cytokinin receptor histidine kinases in response to abscisic acid, drought, and salt stress in Arabidopsis.

          In plants, multistep component systems play important roles in signal transduction in response to environmental stimuli and plant growth regulators. Arabidopsis contains six nonethylene receptor histidine kinases, and, among them, AHK1/ATHK1, AHK2, AHK3, and CRE1 were shown to be stress-responsive, suggesting their roles in the regulation of plant response to abiotic stress. Gain- and loss-of-function studies in Arabidopsis indicated that AHK1 is a positive regulator of drought and salt stress responses and abscisic acid (ABA) signaling. Microarray analysis of the ahk1 mutant revealed a down-regulation of many stress- and/or ABA-inducible genes, including AREB1, ANAC, and DREB2A transcription factors and their downstream genes. These data suggest that AHK1 functions upstream of AREB1, ANAC, and DREB2A and positively controls stress responses through both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling pathways. In addition, AHK1 plays important roles in plant growth because the ahk1 ahk2 ahk3 triple mutant showed further reduced growth. Unlike AHK1, loss-of-function analysis of ahk2, ahk3, and cre1 implied that the stress-responsive AHK2, AHK3, and CRE1 act as negative regulators in ABA signaling. AHK2 and AHK3 also negatively control osmotic stress responses in Arabidopsis because ahk2, ahk3, and ahk2 ahk3 mutants were strongly tolerant to drought and salt stress due to up-regulation of many stress- and/or ABA-inducible genes. Last, cytokinin clearly mediates stress responses because it was required for CRE1 to function as a negative regulator of osmotic stress.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Rhizobia: from saprophytes to endosymbionts

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Discovery, Distribution, and Evolution of Viruses Associated with Drosophila melanogaster

              Drosophila melanogaster is a valuable invertebrate model for viral infection and antiviral immunity, and is a focus for studies of insect-virus coevolution. Here we use a metagenomic approach to identify more than 20 previously undetected RNA viruses and a DNA virus associated with wild D. melanogaster. These viruses not only include distant relatives of known insect pathogens but also novel groups of insect-infecting viruses. By sequencing virus-derived small RNAs, we show that the viruses represent active infections of Drosophila. We find that the RNA viruses differ in the number and properties of their small RNAs, and we detect both siRNAs and a novel miRNA from the DNA virus. Analysis of small RNAs also allows us to identify putative viral sequences that lack detectable sequence similarity to known viruses. By surveying >2,000 individually collected wild adult Drosophila we show that more than 30% of D. melanogaster carry a detectable virus, and more than 6% carry multiple viruses. However, despite a high prevalence of the Wolbachia endosymbiont—which is known to be protective against virus infections in Drosophila—we were unable to detect any relationship between the presence of Wolbachia and the presence of any virus. Using publicly available RNA-seq datasets, we show that the community of viruses in Drosophila laboratories is very different from that seen in the wild, but that some of the newly discovered viruses are nevertheless widespread in laboratory lines and are ubiquitous in cell culture. By sequencing viruses from individual wild-collected flies we show that some viruses are shared between D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Our results provide an essential evolutionary and ecological context for host–virus interaction in Drosophila, and the newly reported viral sequences will help develop D. melanogaster further as a model for molecular and evolutionary virus research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Resources
                Role: Resources
                Role: Resources
                Role: Resources
                Role: ResourcesRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Genet
                PLoS Genet
                plos
                plosgen
                PLoS Genetics
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-7390
                1553-7404
                4 November 2019
                November 2019
                : 15
                : 11
                : e1008398
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, King’s Buildings, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [3 ] Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom
                [4 ] Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
                [5 ] Departament de Biologia Animal, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
                [6 ] UMR 7261 CNRS, Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université de Tours, France
                [7 ] Department of Biology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
                The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3358-4949
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2861-949X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0122-6493
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4711-7455
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0096-0330
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2737-696X
                Article
                PGENETICS-D-19-01463
                10.1371/journal.pgen.1008398
                6855507
                31682601
                993e9643-7953-4b87-a7d1-23939912376b
                © 2019 Hearn et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 30 August 2019
                : 23 October 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 6, Pages: 43
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270, Natural Environment Research Council;
                Award ID: NE/J010499
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270, Natural Environment Research Council;
                Award ID: NBAF375 2009-2010
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: MINECO
                Award ID: CGL2015-66571-P
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270, Natural Environment Research Council;
                Award ID: PhD studentship
                Award Recipient :
                This study was supported by a NERC studentship awarded to Jack Hearn, a NERC NBAF grant (NBAF375 2009-2010) awarded to Graham Stone, and NERC grant NE/J010499. Jose-Luis Nieves Aldrey was supported by project CGL2015-66571-P (MINECO, Spain).The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Gene Expression
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Plant Science
                Plant Anatomy
                Buds
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Life Cycles
                Larvae
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genomics
                Animal Genomics
                Invertebrate Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Gene Expression
                Viral Gene Expression
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Microbial Genetics
                Viral Genetics
                Viral Gene Expression
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Virology
                Viral Genetics
                Viral Gene Expression
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Plants
                Trees
                Oaks
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Invertebrates
                Arthropoda
                Insects
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Computational Biology
                Genome Analysis
                Transcriptome Analysis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genomics
                Genome Analysis
                Transcriptome Analysis
                Custom metadata
                vor-update-to-uncorrected-proof
                2019-11-14
                Raw Illumina Hi-Seq data have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under BioProjects PRJEB13357, PRJEB13424, and PRJEB32849.

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article