24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lockdown Experiences and Views on Future Research Participation of Autistic Adults in the UK During the First 6 Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in large-scale public health restrictions and lockdowns across many countries. There is an increasing literature on the varied impact of such lockdowns in autistic adults. However, there is very little research on how the pandemic and related public health measures may impact the willingness of autistic people in engaging and taking part in research. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore autistic adults' experiences of the COVID-19 lockdown and how the pandemic may affect future research participation.

          Methods:

          We conducted in-depth interviews with 31 autistic adults between March and July 2020. Transcripts were analyzed thematically within a critical realism framework.

          Results:

          Participants identified positive aspects of lockdown such as enjoying the lack of social pressures and using their well-developed skills for dealing with uncertainty. Autistic people also shared challenges of adjusting to lockdown, for example, rapid change in daily routines. While hopeful about the freedom gained from easing restrictions, participants were concerned about the inconsistent communication and application of rules during the transition out of lockdown. This may have exacerbated already rising mental health issues among autistic people. The participants viewed research participation and engagement with increased relevance during the pandemic and welcomed efforts to conduct research using online methods of communication.

          Conclusion:

          The COVID-19 lockdown had a varied effect in the lives and routines of autistic people. However, health care providers and researchers need to be mindful of rising mental health issues in the aftermath of the pandemic, especially for people who were already vulnerable. The response to the pandemic may have offered opportunities for innovation in research processes enabling more autistic people to engage with research and making studies more inclusive.

          Community brief

          Why is this an important issue?

          We did not know how the pandemic and the strict restrictions that followed would affect autistic people's well-being and mental health.

          Also, there was a worry that the pandemic would affect the number of volunteers taking part in research that matters the most to autistic people. Thus, it was important to understand any implications for the way we conduct research with the autistic community after the pandemic.

          What was the purpose of this study?

          We explored the experiences of autistic people living through the first 6 months of the COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom. We were particularly interested in autistic people's views on how the pandemic may affect them taking part in research.

          What did the researchers do?

          We co-produced this interview study to answer our research questions. We carried out in-depth interviews with 31 autistic people. We looked for patterns or themes in what the participants said.

          What were the results of the study?

          Autistic people we interviewed reported being able to enjoy a quieter pace of life. They felt less anxious early in the lockdown. But they also faced great challenges adjusting to changes in their daily routines. Inconsistent public health communication caused worry during the transition out of lockdown. Unnecessary stress might have led to worsening of mental health issues in some people. Our participants held positive views on taking part in and engage with research, despite the pandemic. We identified opportunities that could make research more inclusive for autistic people, for example, online methods for taking consent and taking part in research remotely.

          What do these findings add to what was already known?

          Our study adds to the evidence of the varied responses of autistic people to the pandemic and the public health measures that it led to. One important strength of our work is our focus on the impact of the pandemic on research and implications of future research. We learnt that autistic people welcome and value the use of online technology to reach study participants. Wider use of remote technology can make research more inclusive and participatory.

          What are potential weaknesses in the study?

          Many of our participants were already had experience participating in research. Also most had relatively high education levels. We did not include autistic people with intellectual disabilities. We did not collect information on ethnicity. Our sample is likely to have little ethnic diversity.

          How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?

          We describe the experiences of autistic people in the face of unprecedented circumstances. We found the need for clear public health communication to avoid unnecessary stress. The pandemic has provided the opportunity for a wider use of remote methods of research, even in areas where this was not done in the past (e.g., clinical trials). Our study found that such approaches would make research more inclusive.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence

          Summary The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health in the General Population: A Systematic Review

            Highlights • The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in unprecedented hazards to mental health globally. • Relatively high rates of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychological distress, and stress were reported in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic in eight countries. • Common risk factors associated with mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic include female gender, younger age group (≤40 years), presence of chronic/psychiatric illnesses, unemployment, student status, and frequent exposure to social media/news concerning COVID-19. • Mitigation of COVID-19 induced psychological distress requires government intervention and individual efforts.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power

              Sample sizes must be ascertained in qualitative studies like in quantitative studies but not by the same means. The prevailing concept for sample size in qualitative studies is "saturation." Saturation is closely tied to a specific methodology, and the term is inconsistently applied. We propose the concept "information power" to guide adequate sample size for qualitative studies. Information power indicates that the more information the sample holds, relevant for the actual study, the lower amount of participants is needed. We suggest that the size of a sample with sufficient information power depends on (a) the aim of the study, (b) sample specificity, (c) use of established theory, (d) quality of dialogue, and (e) analysis strategy. We present a model where these elements of information and their relevant dimensions are related to information power. Application of this model in the planning and during data collection of a qualitative study is discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Autism Adulthood
                Autism Adulthood
                aut
                Autism in Adulthood: Challenges and Management
                Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers (140 Huguenot Street, 3rd Floor New Rochelle, NY 10801 USA )
                2573-9581
                2573-959X
                September 2023
                30 August 2023
                30 August 2023
                : 5
                : 3
                : 301-310
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
                [ 2 ]Autism Study Advisor, Bristol, United Kingdom.
                [ 3 ]Autistica UK Charity, London, United Kingdom.
                [ 4 ]Learning Disability and Autism Programme, NHS England & NHS Improvement, London, United Kingdom.
                [ 5 ]Avon and Wiltshire Partnership NHS Mental Health Trust, Bath, United Kingdom.
                [ 6 ]NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
                Author notes
                [*]Address correspondence to: Alba X. Realpe, PhD, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, United Kingdom alba.realpe@ 123456bristol.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9502-3907
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2960-2940
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4279-5644
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5877-8099
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7239-3523
                Article
                10.1089/aut.2022.0027
                10.1089/aut.2022.0027
                10468553
                37663442
                9893b9b9-be5d-44d4-a0f4-dcda1261d61d
                © Alba X. Realpe et al., 2023; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

                This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, References: 48, Pages: 10
                Categories
                Original Research

                autism in adults,covid-19 pandemic,first lockdown experiences,qualitative study,trial methods

                Comments

                Comment on this article