2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      An unusually robust specimen attributed to Buriolestes schultzi (Dinosauria: Sauropodomorpha) from the Late Triassic of southern Brazil

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Buriolestes schultzi is a small sauropodomorph dinosaur from Carnian beds (ca., 233 Ma) of southern Brazil. It is one of the earliest members of that lineage and is a key taxon to investigate the initial evolution of Sauropodomorpha. Here, we attribute a new specimen to B. schultzi from Late Triassic of southern Brazil, which represents the first occurrence of the taxon outside the type locality. The new specimen comprises a disarticulated and partial skeleton, including cranial and postcranial elements. It is tentatively regarded as an additional specimen of B. schultzi according to a unique combination of traits (including autapomorphies). Conversely, the new specimen is stouter than the other specimens of B. schultzi, as shown by femoral Robustness Index . Based on femoral circumference, the estimated body mass of the new specimen is approximately 15 kg, which is far higher than the previous estimations for other specimens of B. schultzi (i.e., approximately 7 kg). In fact, the new specimen and some specimens of Eoraptor lunensis and Saturnalia tupiniquim were found to be significantly stouter than coeval sauropodomorphs. Therefore, instead of all being constructed as gracile, the earliest sauropodomorphs experienced an unappreciated intraspecific variation in robustness. This is interesting because more precise data on species body mass are crucial in order to better understand the complex terrestrial ecosystems in which dinosaurs originated.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          On the Classification of the Fossil Animals Commonly Named Dinosauria

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A nomenclature for vertebral laminae in sauropods and other saurischian dinosaurs

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A new hypothesis of dinosaur relationships and early dinosaur evolution

              For 130 years, dinosaurs have been divided into two distinct clades—Ornithischia and Saurischia. Here we present a hypothesis for the phylogenetic relationships of the major dinosaurian groups that challenges the current consensus concerning early dinosaur evolution and highlights problematic aspects of current cladistic definitions. Our
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                The Anatomical Record
                The Anatomical Record
                Wiley
                1932-8486
                1932-8494
                September 19 2023
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Programa de Pós‐Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Santa Maria Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
                [2 ] Centro de Apoio à Pesquisa Paleontológica da Quarta Colônia Universidade Federal de Santa Maria São João do Polêsine Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
                Article
                10.1002/ar.25319
                97ff9704-24f8-4e53-8b27-211f4bc5061d
                © 2023

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article