76
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Detecting outliers when fitting data with nonlinear regression – a new method based on robust nonlinear regression and the false discovery rate

      research-article
      1 , , 2
      BMC Bioinformatics
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Nonlinear regression, like linear regression, assumes that the scatter of data around the ideal curve follows a Gaussian or normal distribution. This assumption leads to the familiar goal of regression: to minimize the sum of the squares of the vertical or Y-value distances between the points and the curve. Outliers can dominate the sum-of-the-squares calculation, and lead to misleading results. However, we know of no practical method for routinely identifying outliers when fitting curves with nonlinear regression.

          Results

          We describe a new method for identifying outliers when fitting data with nonlinear regression. We first fit the data using a robust form of nonlinear regression, based on the assumption that scatter follows a Lorentzian distribution. We devised a new adaptive method that gradually becomes more robust as the method proceeds. To define outliers, we adapted the false discovery rate approach to handling multiple comparisons. We then remove the outliers, and analyze the data using ordinary least-squares regression. Because the method combines robust regression and outlier removal, we call it the ROUT method.

          When analyzing simulated data, where all scatter is Gaussian, our method detects (falsely) one or more outlier in only about 1–3% of experiments. When analyzing data contaminated with one or several outliers, the ROUT method performs well at outlier identification, with an average False Discovery Rate less than 1%.

          Conclusion

          Our method, which combines a new method of robust nonlinear regression with a new method of outlier identification, identifies outliers from nonlinear curve fits with reasonable power and few false positives.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Robust estimation in very small samples

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Controlling the false descovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Bioinformatics
                BMC Bioinformatics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2105
                2006
                9 March 2006
                : 7
                : 123
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
                [2 ]AISN Software Inc., Florence, OR, USA
                Article
                1471-2105-7-123
                10.1186/1471-2105-7-123
                1472692
                16526949
                96d3e6bb-ec8f-4e86-b7c1-4a0d18d3b306
                Copyright © 2006 Motulsky and Brown; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 September 2005
                : 9 March 2006
                Categories
                Methodology Article

                Bioinformatics & Computational biology
                Bioinformatics & Computational biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article