12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The implication of calf circumference and grip strength in osteoporosis and bone mineral density among hemodialysis patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Chronic kidney disease–mineral and bone disorder (CKD–MBD), nutritional status, and uremia management have been emphasized for bone management in hemodialysis patients. Nevertheless, valuable data on the importance of muscle mass in bone management are limited, including whether conventional management alone can prevent osteoporosis. Thus, the importance of muscle mass and strength, independent of the conventional management in osteoporosis prevention among hemodialysis patients, was evaluated.

          Methods

          Patients with a history of hemodialysis 6 months or longer were selected. We assessed the risk for osteoporosis associated with calf circumference or grip strength using multivariable adjustment for indices of CKD–MBD, nutrition, and dialysis adequacy. Moreover, the associations between bone mineral density (BMD), calf circumference, grip strength, and bone metabolic markers were also evaluated.

          Results

          A total of 136 patients were included. The odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for osteoporosis at the femoral neck were 1.25 (1.04–1.54, P < 0.05) and 1.08 (1.00–1.18, P < 0.05) per 1 cm shorter calf circumference or 1 kg weaker grip strength, respectively. Shorter calf circumference was significantly associated with a lower BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine ( P < 0.001). Weaker grip strength was also associated with lower BMD at the femoral neck ( P < 0.01). Calf circumference or grip strength was negatively correlated with bone metabolic marker values.

          Conclusion

          Shorter calf circumference or weaker grip strength was associated with osteoporosis risk and lower BMD among hemodialysis patients, independent of the conventional therapies.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10157-022-02308-8.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment

          Clinical and research interest in sarcopenia has burgeoned internationally, Asia included. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2014 consensus defined sarcopenia as "age-related loss of muscle mass, plus low muscle strength, and/or low physical performance" and specified cutoffs for each diagnostic component; research in Asia consequently flourished, prompting this update. AWGS 2019 retains the previous definition of sarcopenia but revises the diagnostic algorithm, protocols, and some criteria: low muscle strength is defined as handgrip strength <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women; criteria for low physical performance are 6-m walk <1.0 m/s, Short Physical Performance Battery score ≤9, or 5-time chair stand test ≥12 seconds. AWGS 2019 retains the original cutoffs for height-adjusted muscle mass: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, <7.0 kg/m2 in men and <5.4 kg/m2 in women; and bioimpedance, <7.0 kg/m2 in men and <5.7 kg/m2 in women. In addition, the AWGS 2019 update proposes separate algorithms for community vs hospital settings, which both begin by screening either calf circumference (<34 cm in men, <33 cm in women), SARC-F (≥4), or SARC-CalF (≥11), to facilitate earlier identification of people at risk for sarcopenia. Although skeletal muscle strength and mass are both still considered fundamental to a definitive clinical diagnosis, AWGS 2019 also introduces "possible sarcopenia," defined by either low muscle strength or low physical performance only, specifically for use in primary health care or community-based health promotion, to enable earlier lifestyle interventions. Although defining sarcopenia by body mass index-adjusted muscle mass instead of height-adjusted muscle mass may predict adverse outcomes better, more evidence is needed before changing current recommendations. Lifestyle interventions, especially exercise and nutritional supplementation, prevail as mainstays of treatment. Further research is needed to investigate potential long-term benefits of lifestyle interventions, nutritional supplements, or pharmacotherapy for sarcopenia in Asians.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients.

            Patients at risk of malnutrition and related morbidity and mortality can be identified with the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI). However, this index remains limited for elderly patients because of difficulties in establishing their normal weight. Therefore, we replaced the usual weight in this formula by ideal weight according to the Lorentz formula (WLo), creating a new index called the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI). First, a prospective study enrolled 181 hospitalized elderly patients. Nutritional status [albumin, prealbumin, and body mass index (BMI)] and GNRI were assessed. GNRI correlated with a severity score taking into account complications (bedsores or infections) and 6-mo mortality. Second, the GNRI was measured prospectively in 2474 patients admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation care unit over a 3-y period. The severity score correlated with albumin and GNRI but not with BMI or weight:WLo. Risk of mortality (odds ratio) and risk of complications were, respectively, 29 (95% CI: 5.2, 161.4) and 4.4 (95% CI: 1.3, 14.9) for major nutrition-related risk (GNRI: <82), 6.6 (95% CI: 1.3, 33.0), 4.9 (95% CI: 1.9, 12.5) for moderate nutrition-related risk (GNRI: 82 to <92), and 5.6 (95% CI: 1.2, 26.6) and 3.3 (95% CI: 1.4, 8.0) for a low nutrition-related risk (GNRI: 92 to < or =98). Accordingly, 12.2%, 31.4%, 29.4%, and 27.0% of the 2474 patients had major, moderate, low, and no nutrition-related risk, respectively. GNRI is a simple and accurate tool for predicting the risk of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized elderly patients and should be recorded systematically on admission.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hirawa@yokohama-cu.ac.jp
                Journal
                Clin Exp Nephrol
                Clin Exp Nephrol
                Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
                Springer Nature Singapore (Singapore )
                1342-1751
                1437-7799
                27 December 2022
                27 December 2022
                2023
                : 27
                : 4
                : 365-373
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.413045.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0467 212X, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, , Yokohama City University Medical Center, ; 4-57, Urafune-Cho, Minami-Ku, Yokohama, Japan
                [2 ]GRID grid.268441.d, ISNI 0000 0001 1033 6139, Department of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, , Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, ; Yokohama, Japan
                [3 ]GRID grid.470126.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1767 0473, YCU Center for Novel and Exploratory Clinical Trials (Y-NEXT), , Yokohama City University Hospital, ; Yokohama, Japan
                [4 ]Kamiooka Jinsei Clinic, Kousaikai Medical Corporation, Yokohama, Japan
                [5 ]Yokohama Jinsei Hospital, Kousaikai Medical Corporation, Yokohama, Japan
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5824-3652
                Article
                2308
                10.1007/s10157-022-02308-8
                10023647
                36574105
                96cf25c1-0cf6-45f0-ad73-9871ffbb782d
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 October 2022
                : 2 December 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100017104, Yokohama City University;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Society of Nephrology 2023

                Nephrology
                hemodialysis,osteoporosis,sarcopenia
                Nephrology
                hemodialysis, osteoporosis, sarcopenia

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content164

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors647