4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      COVID-19 vaccine coverage, safety, and perceptions among patients with diabetes mellitus in China: a cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          Diabetes mellitus (DM), one of the most common chronic diseases in China, is a risk factor for SARS-COV-2 infection and poor prognosis of COVID-19. The COVID-19 vaccine is one of the key measures to control the pandemic. However, the actual coverage of COVID-19 vaccination and associated factors remain unclear among DM patients in China. We conducted this study to investigate the COVID-19 vaccine coverage, safety, and perceptions among patients with DM in China.

          Methods

          A cross-sectional study of a sample of 2200 DM patients from 180 tertiary hospitals in China was performed using a questionnaire developed through the Wen Juan Xing survey platform to collect information regarding their coverage, safety, and perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination. A multinomial logistic regression analysis model was performed to determine any independent relationships with COVID-19 vaccination behavior among DM patients.

          Results

          In total, 1929 (87.7%) DM patients have received at least one dose COVID-19 vaccine, and 271 (12.3%) DM patients were unvaccinated. In addition, 65.2% (n = 1434) were booster vaccinated against COVID-19, while 16.2% (n = 357) were only fully vaccinated and 6.3% (n = 138) were only partially vaccinated. The prevalence of adverse effects after the first dose of vaccine, the second dose of vaccine, and the third dose of vaccine were 6.0%, 6.0%, and 4.3% respectively. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that DM patients complicated with immune and inflammatory diseases (partially vaccinated: OR = 0.12; fully vaccinated: OR = 0.11; booster vaccinated: OR = 0.28), diabetic nephropathy (partially vaccinated: OR = 0.23; fully vaccinated: OR = 0.50; booster vaccinated: OR = 0.30), and perceptions on the safety of COVID-19 vaccine (partially vaccinated: OR = 0.44; fully vaccinated: OR = 0.48; booster vaccinated: OR = 0.45) were all associated with the three of vaccination status.

          Conclusion

          This study showed that higher proportion of COVID-19 vaccine coverage among patients with DM in China. The concern about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine affected the vaccine behavior in patients with DM. The COVID-19 vaccine was relatively safe for DM patients due to all side effects were self-limiting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine against Covid-19

          Background The Ad26.COV2.S vaccine is a recombinant, replication-incompetent human adenovirus type 26 vector encoding full-length severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein in a prefusion-stabilized conformation. Methods In an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adult participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of Ad26.COV2.S (5×10 10 viral particles) or placebo. The primary end points were vaccine efficacy against moderate to severe–critical coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) with an onset at least 14 days and at least 28 days after administration among participants in the per-protocol population who had tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Safety was also assessed. Results The per-protocol population included 19,630 SARS-CoV-2–negative participants who received Ad26.COV2.S and 19,691 who received placebo. Ad26.COV2.S protected against moderate to severe–critical Covid-19 with onset at least 14 days after administration (116 cases in the vaccine group vs. 348 in the placebo group; efficacy, 66.9%; adjusted 95% confidence interval [CI], 59.0 to 73.4) and at least 28 days after administration (66 vs. 193 cases; efficacy, 66.1%; adjusted 95% CI, 55.0 to 74.8). Vaccine efficacy was higher against severe–critical Covid-19 (76.7% [adjusted 95% CI, 54.6 to 89.1] for onset at ≥14 days and 85.4% [adjusted 95% CI, 54.2 to 96.9] for onset at ≥28 days). Despite 86 of 91 cases (94.5%) in South Africa with sequenced virus having the 20H/501Y.V2 variant, vaccine efficacy was 52.0% and 64.0% against moderate to severe–critical Covid-19 with onset at least 14 days and at least 28 days after administration, respectively, and efficacy against severe–critical Covid-19 was 73.1% and 81.7%, respectively. Reactogenicity was higher with Ad26.COV2.S than with placebo but was generally mild to moderate and transient. The incidence of serious adverse events was balanced between the two groups. Three deaths occurred in the vaccine group (none were Covid-19–related), and 16 in the placebo group (5 were Covid-19–related). Conclusions A single dose of Ad26.COV2.S protected against symptomatic Covid-19 and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and was effective against severe–critical disease, including hospitalization and death. Safety appeared to be similar to that in other phase 3 trials of Covid-19 vaccines. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development and others; ENSEMBLE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04505722 .)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations

            An effective rollout of vaccinations against COVID-19 offers the most promising prospect of bringing the pandemic to an end. We present the Our World in Data COVID-19 vaccination dataset, a global public dataset that tracks the scale and rate of the vaccine rollout across the world. This dataset is updated regularly and includes data on the total number of vaccinations administered, first and second doses administered, daily vaccination rates and population-adjusted coverage for all countries for which data are available (169 countries as of 7 April 2021). It will be maintained as the global vaccination campaign continues to progress. This resource aids policymakers and researchers in understanding the rate of current and potential vaccine rollout; the interactions with non-vaccination policy responses; the potential impact of vaccinations on pandemic outcomes such as transmission, morbidity and mortality; and global inequalities in vaccine access.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Type 2 diabetes.

              415 million people live with diabetes worldwide, and an estimated 193 million people have undiagnosed diabetes. Type 2 diabetes accounts for more than 90% of patients with diabetes and leads to microvascular and macrovascular complications that cause profound psychological and physical distress to both patients and carers and put a huge burden on health-care systems. Despite increasing knowledge regarding risk factors for type 2 diabetes and evidence for successful prevention programmes, the incidence and prevalence of the disease continues to rise globally. Early detection through screening programmes and the availability of safe and effective therapies reduces morbidity and mortality by preventing or delaying complications. Increased understanding of specific diabetes phenotypes and genotypes might result in more specific and tailored management of patients with type 2 diabetes, as has been shown in patients with maturity onset diabetes of the young. In this Seminar, we describe recent developments in the diagnosis and management of type 2 diabetes, existing controversies, and future directions of care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
                Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
                Front. Endocrinol.
                Frontiers in Endocrinology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2392
                01 June 2023
                2023
                01 June 2023
                : 14
                : 1172089
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Clinical Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College , Beijing, China
                [2] 2 Department of Endocrinology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital , Beijing, China
                [3] 3 Department of Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College , Beijing, China
                [4] 4 Department of Endocrinology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University , Chongqing, China
                [5] 5 Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University , Beijing, China
                [6] 6 The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology , Luoyang, China
                [7] 7 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University , Guangzhou, China
                [8] 8 Department of Endocrinology, Gansu Provincial People’s Hospital , Lanzhou, Gansu, China
                [9] 9 Department of Endocrinology, Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital , Beijing, China
                [10] 10 Department of Endocrinology, Handan Central Hospital , Handan, China
                [11] 11 Department of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Diabetology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
                [12] 12 Department of Endocrinology, Capital Medical University , Beijing, China
                [13] 13 Department of Endocrinology, Liaoyang Central Hospital , Liaoyang, Liaoning, China
                [14] 14 Department of Endocrinology, ShenZhen Hospital, Southern Medical University , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Erwin Dieter Schleicher, University of Tübingen, Germany

                Reviewed by: Ritika Kaur, Apollo Speciality Hospitals, Chennai, India; Murugesan Velayutham, West Virginia University, United States; Zhihui Tong, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, China

                *Correspondence: Yongzhe Li, yongzhelipumch@ 123456126.com ; Xinhua Xiao, xiaoxh2014@ 123456vip.163.com

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fendo.2023.1172089
                10270113
                9543378c-ca19-4123-ac7e-1752d2b002c0
                Copyright © 2023 Li, Ping, Li, Wang, Xiao, Jiang, Xue, Quan, Yao, Zheng, Chen, Li, Yu, Xu, Feng, Wang, Li and Xiao

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 23 February 2023
                : 15 May 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 6, Equations: 1, References: 61, Pages: 18, Words: 9411
                Funding
                Funded by: National Key Research and Development Program of China , doi 10.13039/501100012166;
                Award ID: 2018YFE0207300
                Funded by: Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation , doi 10.13039/501100005089;
                Funded by: Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission , doi 10.13039/501100009592;
                This work was supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (M23008), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFE0207300), Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z211100002521021), the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-PUMCH-B-124). This work is supported by Beijing Key Clinical Specialty for Laboratory Medicine - Excellent Project (No. ZK201000).
                Categories
                Endocrinology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Clinical Diabetes

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                diabetes mellitus,covid-19,vaccine,vaccine uptake,china
                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                diabetes mellitus, covid-19, vaccine, vaccine uptake, china

                Comments

                Comment on this article