17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Reasons for healthcare workers becoming infected with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sir, The outbreak of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in mainland China has been declared as a public health emergency (PHE) by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. Globally, until February 28th, 2020, there have been reported 83,774 confirmed cases and 2867 deaths [2]. During the periods of outbreak of COVID-19 or other infectious diseases, implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) is of great importance in healthcare settings, especially regarding personal protection of healthcare workers [3,4]. In order to contain the outbreak of COVID-19 in mainland China, the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China (NHCPRC) has so far dispatched medical support teams (41,600 healthcare workers from 30 provinces and municipalities) to assist with medical treatment in Wuhan and Hubei provinces [5]. A survey by the Health Commission of Guangdong Province released information on the distribution of 2431 healthcare workers in the Guangdong medical support teams [6]. Nurses (∼60%) were the predominant healthcare workers in the teams, followed by clinicians (∼30%). Half of clinicians with job titles were deputy chief physician, and 25% specialized in respiratory and critical medicine [6]. It is worth mentioning that 5.8% (140/2431) healthcare workers worked on the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003 [6]. Recently, Wu et al. have reported the problems relating to COVID-19 IPC in healthcare settings, highlighting the personal protection of healthcare workers [7]. However, at a press conference of the WHO–China Joint Mission on COVID-19, NHCPRC reported that up until February 24th 2055 healthcare workers (community/hospital-acquired not to be defined) had been confirmed infected with COVID-19, with 22 (1.1%) deaths [8]. Ninety percent of infected healthcare workers were from Hubei province, and most cases happened in late January. It is worth mentioning that the proportion of healthcare workers infected by COVID-19 (2.7%, 95% CI: 2.6–2.8) was significantly lower compared with healthcare workers infected by SARS (21.1%, 95% CI: 20.2–22.0). Therefore, the director of the National Hospital Infection Management and Quality Control Centre summarized some reasons for such a high number of infected healthcare workers during the beginning of the emergency outbreak [9]. First, inadequate personal protection of healthcare workers at the beginning of the epidemic was a central issue. In fact, they did not understand the pathogen well; and their awareness of personal protection was not strong enough. Therefore, the front-line healthcare workers did not implement the effective personal protection before conducting the treatment. Second, long-time exposure to large numbers of infected patients directly increased the risk of infection for healthcare workers. Also, pressure of treatment, work intensity, and lack of rest indirectly increased the probability of infection for healthcare workers. Third, shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) was also a serious problem. First-level emergency responses have been initiated in various parts of the country, which has led to a rapid increase in the demand for PPE. This circumstance increased the risk of infection for healthcare workers due to lack of sufficient PPE. Fourth, the front-line healthcare workers (except infectious disease physicians) received inadequate training for IPC, leaving them with a lack of knowledge of IPC for respiratory-borne infectious diseases. After initiation of emergency responses, healthcare workers have not had enough time for systematic training and practice. Professional supervision and guidance, as well as monitoring mechanisms, were lacking. This situation further amplified the risk of infection for healthcare workers. Finally, international communities, especially in other low- and middle-income countries with potential COVID-19 outbreaks, should learn early how to protect their healthcare workers. Furthermore, the COVID-19 confirmed cases have been reported to have surged in South Korea, Japan, Italy, and Iran in the past few days [2]. The increase in awareness of personal protection, sufficient PPE, and proper preparedness and response would play an important role in lowering the risk of infection for healthcare workers. Conflict of interest statement None declared. Funding sources None.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Implementation of infection prevention and control in acute care hospitals in Mainland China – a systematic review

          Background Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) affect patients in acute-care hospitals worldwide. No systematic review has been published on adoption and implementation of the infection prevention and control (IPC) key components. The objective of this systematic review was to assess adoption and implementation of the three areas issued by the “National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China” in acute-care hospitals in Mainland China, and to compare the findings with the key and core components on effective IPC, issued by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO). Methods We searched PubMed and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure for reports on the areas “structure, organisation and management of IPC”, “education and training in IPC”, and “surveillance of outcome and process indicators in IPC” in acute-care facilities in Mainland China, published between January 2012 and October 2017. Results were stratified into primary care hospitals and secondary/tertiary care hospitals. Results A total of 6580 publications were retrieved, of which 56 were eligible for final analysis. Most of them were survey reports (n = 27), followed by observational studies (n = 17), and interventional studies (n = 12), either on hand hygiene promotion and best practice interventions (n = 7), or by applying education and training programmes (n = 5). More elements on IPC were reported by secondary/tertiary care hospitals than by primary care hospitals. Gaps were identified in the lack of detailing on organisation and management of IPC, education and training activities, and targets of surveillance such as central line-associated bloodstream infections, ventilator associated pneumonia, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and Clostridium difficile infections. Information was available on adoption and implementation of 7 out of the 10 ECDC key components, and 7 out of the 8 WHO core components. Conclusion To variable degrees, there is evidence on implementation of all NHCPRC areas and of most of the ECDC key components and the WHO core components in acute care hospitals in Mainland China. The results are encouraging, but gaps in effective IPC were identified that may be used to guide future national policy-making in Mainland China. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0481-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia in medical institutions: problems in prevention and control

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Protecting health-care workers from subclinical coronavirus infection

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Hosp Infect
                J. Hosp. Infect
                The Journal of Hospital Infection
                The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                0195-6701
                1532-2939
                6 March 2020
                6 March 2020
                :
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
                [b ]Dong Guan Nosocomial Infection Control and Quality Improvement Centre, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, China
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Address: Université de Genève Faculté de Médecine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland. Tel.: +41-789-73-11-24. jiancong.wang@ 123456outlook.com
                Article
                S0195-6701(20)30101-8
                10.1016/j.jhin.2020.03.002
                7134479
                32147406
                951d9d37-d402-430b-9152-1c9b5019efbc
                © 2020 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 28 February 2020
                : 2 March 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article