9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      It's Politics, Isn't It? Investigating Direct and Indirect Influences of Political Orientation on Risk Perception of COVID‐19

      research-article
      1 , 2 ,
      Risk Analysis
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      COVID‐19, media use, political orientation, risk perception

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Public response to the COVID‐19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to study risk perception in relation to political orientation. We tested a risk perception model of how political orientation influences risk perception of an emerging infectious disease and how it moderates other influences. Two nationwide online surveys in South Korea ( N = 2,000) revealed that conservatives showed a higher risk perception regarding an emerging infectious disease, and political orientation can even moderate the influence of perceived risk characteristics on risk perception such as how a liberal orientation exhibited a greater outrage effect of perceived unfairness on COVID‐19 risk perception. Also, the frequency of media use is positively related to higher risk perception. The implications of the direct and moderating effects of political orientation are discussed in the context of the studies of political orientation as well as risk perception.

          Related collections

          Most cited references102

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

          In this article, we attempt to distinguish between the properties of moderator and mediator variables at a number of levels. First, we seek to make theorists and researchers aware of the importance of not using the terms moderator and mediator interchangeably by carefully elaborating, both conceptually and strategically, the many ways in which moderators and mediators differ. We then go beyond this largely pedagogical function and delineate the conceptual and strategic implications of making use of such distinctions with regard to a wide range of phenomena, including control and stress, attitudes, and personality traits. We also provide a specific compendium of analytic procedures appropriate for making the most effective use of the moderator and mediator distinction, both separately and in terms of a broader causal system that includes both moderators and mediators.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Risk as feelings.

            Virtually all current theories of choice under risk or uncertainty are cognitive and consequentialist. They assume that people assess the desirability and likelihood of possible outcomes of choice alternatives and integrate this information through some type of expectation-based calculus to arrive at a decision. The authors propose an alternative theoretical perspective, the risk-as-feelings hypothesis, that highlights the role of affect experienced at the moment of decision making. Drawing on research from clinical, physiological, and other subfields of psychology, they show that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks. When such divergence occurs, emotional reactions often drive behavior. The risk-as-feelings hypothesis is shown to explain a wide range of phenomena that have resisted interpretation in cognitive-consequentialist terms.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                msyou@snu.ac.kr
                Journal
                Risk Anal
                Risk Anal
                10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924
                RISA
                Risk Analysis
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0272-4332
                1539-6924
                29 August 2021
                29 August 2021
                : 10.1111/risa.13801
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Media School Hallym University 1 Hallymdaehak‐Gil Chuncheon Gangwon‐Do 24252 Republic of Korea
                [ 2 ] The Department of Health Science in the Graduate School of Public Health Seoul National University Seoul South Korea
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Address correspondence to Myoungsoon You, The Department of Health Science in the Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak‐Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea; tel: +82(2)880‐2774; fax: +82(2)762‐9105; msyou@ 123456snu.ac.kr .

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8228-4825
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9869-014X
                Article
                RISA13801
                10.1111/risa.13801
                8661611
                34459000
                93a08338-fa26-4589-90da-40ddfad00ccd
                © 2021 Society for Risk Analysis

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 02 April 2021
                : 04 July 2020
                : 22 July 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 13, Words: 8967
                Funding
                Funded by: Hallym University , doi 10.13039/501100002632;
                Award ID: HRF‐201910‐010
                Categories
                Original Research Article
                Original Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.9 mode:remove_FC converted:10.12.2021

                covid‐19,media use,political orientation,risk perception

                Comments

                Comment on this article