5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Burkholderia pseudomallei Clinical Isolates Are Highly Susceptible In Vitro to Cefiderocol, a Siderophore Cephalosporin

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cefiderocol is a cephalosporin designed to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. By forming a chelated complex with ferric iron, cefiderocol is transported into the periplasmic space via bacterial iron transport systems and primarily binds to penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) to inhibit peptidoglycan synthesis. This mode of action results in cefiderocol having greater in vitro activity against many Gram-negative bacilli than currently used carbapenems, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and cephalosporins.

          ABSTRACT

          Cefiderocol is a cephalosporin designed to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. By forming a chelated complex with ferric iron, cefiderocol is transported into the periplasmic space via bacterial iron transport systems and primarily binds to penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) to inhibit peptidoglycan synthesis. This mode of action results in cefiderocol having greater in vitro activity against many Gram-negative bacilli than currently used carbapenems, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and cephalosporins. Thus, we investigated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol against a total of 246 clinical isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei from Queensland, Australia. The collection was composed primarily of bloodstream (56.1%), skin and soft tissue (16.3%), and respiratory (15.9%) isolates. MICs of cefiderocol ranged from ≤0.03 to 16 mg/liter, whereas the MIC 90 was 0.125 mg/liter. Based upon CLSI clinical breakpoints for cefiderocol against Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Acinetobacter baumannii , and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , three isolates (1.2%) would be classified as nonsusceptible (MIC > 4 mg/liter). Using EUCAST non-species-specific (pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic [PK/PD]) clinical breakpoints or those set for Pseudomonas aeruginosa , four isolates (1.6%) would be resistant (MIC > 2 mg/liter). Further testing for coresistance to meropenem, ceftazidime, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and doxycycline was performed on the four isolates with elevated cefiderocol MICs (>2 mg/liter); all isolates exhibited resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, while three isolates also displayed resistance to at least one other antimicrobial. Cefiderocol was found to be highly active in vitro against B. pseudomallei primary clinical isolates. This compound shows great potential for the treatment of melioidosis in countries of endemicity and should be explored further.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis

          The spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria poses a substantial threat to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Due to its large public health and societal implications, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis has been long regarded by WHO as a global priority for investment in new drugs. In 2016, WHO was requested by member states to create a priority list of other antibiotic-resistant bacteria to support research and development of effective drugs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

            The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) continues to view with concern the lean pipeline for novel therapeutics to treat drug-resistant infections, especially those caused by gram-negative pathogens. Infections now occur that are resistant to all current antibacterial options. Although the IDSA is encouraged by the prospect of success for some agents currently in preclinical development, there is an urgent, immediate need for new agents with activity against these panresistant organisms. There is no evidence that this need will be met in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, we remain concerned that the infrastructure for discovering and developing new antibacterials continues to stagnate, thereby risking the future pipeline of antibacterial drugs. The IDSA proposed solutions in its 2004 policy report, "Bad Bugs, No Drugs: As Antibiotic R&D Stagnates, a Public Health Crisis Brews," and recently issued a "Call to Action" to provide an update on the scope of the problem and the proposed solutions. A primary objective of these periodic reports is to encourage a community and legislative response to establish greater financial parity between the antimicrobial development and the development of other drugs. Although recent actions of the Food and Drug Administration and the 110th US Congress present a glimmer of hope, significant uncertainly remains. Now, more than ever, it is essential to create a robust and sustainable antibacterial research and development infrastructure--one that can respond to current antibacterial resistance now and anticipate evolving resistance. This challenge requires that industry, academia, the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the US Department of Defense, and the new Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority at the Department of Health and Human Services work productively together. This report provides an update on potentially effective antibacterial drugs in the late-stage development pipeline, in the hope of encouraging such collaborative action.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Cefiderocol versus imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections caused by Gram-negative uropathogens: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
                Antimicrob Agents Chemother
                American Society for Microbiology
                0066-4804
                1098-6596
                January 20 2021
                January 20 2021
                : 65
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia
                [2 ]Pathology Queensland, Queensland Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia
                [3 ]Forensic and Scientific Services, Queensland Health, Coopers Plains, Queensland, Australia
                [4 ]Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland Health, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
                [5 ]Department of Infectious Diseases, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
                [6 ]Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
                [7 ]Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
                [8 ]Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Queensland Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia
                Article
                10.1128/AAC.00685-20
                33168603
                91655b0b-66e3-4b0e-ae90-a036118c4f7d
                © 2021

                https://journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article