19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Checkpoint inhibitors as immunotherapy for fungal infections: Promises, challenges, and unanswered questions

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Opportunistic fungal infections have high mortality in patients with severe immune dysfunction. Growing evidence suggests that the immune environment of invasive fungal infections and cancers share common features of immune cell exhaustion through activation of immune checkpoint pathways. This observation gave rise to several preclinical studies and clinical case reports describing blockade of the Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 and Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 immune checkpoint pathways as an adjunct immune enhancement strategy to treat opportunistic fungal infections. The first part of this review summarizes the emerging evidence for contributions of checkpoint pathways to the immunopathology of fungal sepsis, opportunistic mold infections, and dimorphic fungal infections. We then review the potential merits of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as an antifungal immunotherapy, including the incomplete knowledge of the mechanisms involved in both immuno-protective effects and toxicities. In the second part of this review, we discuss the limitations of the current evidence and the many unknowns about ICIs as an antifungal immune enhancement strategy. Based on these gaps of knowledge and lessons learned from cancer immunology studies, we outline a research agenda to determine a “sweet spot” for ICIs in medical mycology. We specifically discuss the importance of more nuanced animal models, the need to study ICI-based combination therapy, potential ICI resistance, the role of the immune microenvironment, and the impact of ICIs given as part of oncological therapies on the natural immunity to various pathogenic fungi.

          Related collections

          Most cited references132

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          CTLA-4 and PD-1 Pathways

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The diverse functions of the PD1 inhibitory pathway

            T cell activation is a highly regulated process involving peptide-MHC engagement of the T cell receptor and positive costimulatory signals. Upon activation, coinhibitory 'checkpoints', including programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), become induced to regulate T cells. PD1 has an essential role in balancing protective immunity and immunopathology, homeostasis and tolerance. However, during responses to chronic pathogens and tumours, PD1 expression can limit protective immunity. Recently developed PD1 pathway inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment for some patients, but the majority of patients do not show complete responses, and adverse events have been noted. This Review discusses the diverse roles of the PD1 pathway in regulating immune responses and how this knowledge can improve cancer immunotherapy as well as restore and/or maintain tolerance during autoimmunity and transplantation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: epidemiology, management and surveillance

              Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies, are arguably the most important development in cancer therapy over the past decade. The indications for these agents continue to expand across malignancies and disease settings, thus reshaping many of the previous standard-of-care approaches and bringing new hope to patients. One of the costs of these advances is the emergence of a new spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which are often distinctly different from the classical chemotherapy-related toxicities. Owing to the growing use of ICIs in oncology, clinicians will increasingly be confronted with common but also rare irAEs; hence, awareness needs to be raised regarding the clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of these toxicities. In this Review, we provide an overview of the various types of irAEs that have emerged to date. We discuss the epidemiology of these events and their kinetics, risk factors, subtypes and pathophysiology, as well as new insights regarding screening and surveillance strategies. We also highlight the most important aspects of the management of irAEs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/621377
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1063422
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/318940
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                25 October 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 1018202
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX, United States
                [2] 2 Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mario César Salinas-Carmona, Autonomous University of Nuevo León, Mexico

                Reviewed by: Mark S. Gresnigt, Hans Knöll Institute, Germany; Ivy M. Dambuza, University of Exeter, United Kingdom; Ramya Sivakumar, University of Washington, United States

                *Correspondence: Sebastian Wurster, stwurster@ 123456mdanderson.org ; Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis, dkontoyi@ 123456mdanderson.org

                This article was submitted to Microbial Immunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2022.1018202
                9640966
                36389687
                903101f9-9909-49a8-9e05-802b3daf7f17
                Copyright © 2022 Wurster, Watowich and Kontoyiannis

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 August 2022
                : 11 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 132, Pages: 18, Words: 9899
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , doi 10.13039/100000060;
                Funded by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , doi 10.13039/100000060;
                Funded by: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , doi 10.13039/100007313;
                Categories
                Immunology
                Review

                Immunology
                immunotherapy,fungal sepsis,candidiasis,aspergillosis,mucormycosis,checkpoint inhibitors,t cells,immune exhaustion

                Comments

                Comment on this article