14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of growth-promoting bacteria on soil nutrient, enzyme activity and bacterial community function diversity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          [Objective] In order to develop and utilize microbial agent with the greatest advantage, the effect of five plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) on soil physicaland chemical characteristics and bacterial community function diversity was analyzed.

          [Method] Selected five strains (PAL5, CA1, CN11, DX120E and WZS021)that were known to promote plant growth, then inoculated the strains to the sterilized soil (without inoculation was as control). The effect of the strains on soil fertility was evaluated by the soil pH, contents of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, activities of alkaline phosphatase, catalase and urease. The functional diversity of bacterial communities in the soil was investigated by Biolog analysis.

          [Result] The results showed that PGPR could significantly increase the soil pH, available nutrients and the slow-acting nutrients ( P<0.05, the same below), respectively. At the same time, it could promote the conversion of soil inorganic phosphorus to soluble phosphorus, and significantly reduce the content of inorganic phosphorus. The activity of alkaline phosphatase, catalase and urease in soil treated by PGPR were significantly higher than that of control. The activity of alkaline phosphatase in CN11 treatment was as 3.64 times as that of the control, and the catalase and urease activities of DX120E treatment were as 2.34 times and 4.52 times as those of the control, respectively. The results of Biolog showed that PGPR could increase the total metabolic activity of bacteria, and CN11 treatment had the highest microbial activity. After each strain treatment, the abundance index, dominance indexand substrate evennessof soil bacterial community were significantly higher than those of the control. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that inoculating PGPR could regulate the functional diversity of soil bacterial communities and regulate the structure of soil bacterial communities, in which the metabolic capacity of bacterial carbon source treated with CN11 treatment and DX120E treatment was strong.

          [Conclusion] PGPR can increase the content of soil nutrients and soil enzyme activities at different extents, and regulate the bacterial community structure. CN11 treatment and DX120E treatment have fine effects in activation of soil nutrients, improvement of soil enzyme activity and microbial community diversity.

          Abstract

          摘要:【目的】探讨植物促生菌对土壤理化特性及细菌群落功能多样性的影响, 为高效微生物菌肥的制备及应用 提供参考依据。 【方法】选用5株对植物生长有促进作用的菌株 (PAL5、CA1、CN11、DX120E和WZS021), 将菌株分别 接种至灭菌土壤 (以不接种为对照), 通过测定土壤pH、氮磷钾养分含量及土壤碱性磷酸酶、过氧化氢酶和脲酶活性, 评价不同促生菌株对土壤肥力的影响; 同时运用Biolog测定方法对土壤中的细菌群落功能多样性进行探究。 【结果】 促生菌处理可显著提高土壤pH及土壤速效和缓效养分含量 ( P<0.05, 下同), 同时可促使土壤无机磷向可溶性磷转 化, 显著降低无机磷含量;促生菌处理的土壤碱性磷酸酶、过氧化氢酶和脲酶活性也显著高于对照, 其中, CN11处理 的碱性磷酸酶活性是对照的3.64倍, DX120E处理的过氧化氢酶和脲酶活性分别是对照的2.34和4.52倍。Biolog测定 结果显示, 接种促生菌可提高细菌总代谢活性, 其中CN11处理的微生物活性最高。各菌株处理后, 土壤细菌群落物 种丰富度指数、优势度指数和均匀度指数均显著高于对照;主成分分析结果表明, 接种促生菌可调控土壤细菌群落功 能多样性及土壤细菌群落结构, 其中CN11和DX120E处理的土壤微生物碳源代谢能力较强。 【结论】施用促生菌可不 同程度地提高土壤养分及土壤酶活性, 调控土壤细菌群落结构。CN11和DX120E处理在土壤养分的活化及提高土壤 酶活性和细菌群落多样性等方面效果较佳。

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JSA
          Journal of Southern Agriculture
          Science Press (Nanling, China )
          2095-1191
          01 October 2020
          01 August 2022
          : 51
          : 10
          : 2348-2357
          Affiliations
          [1] 1College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
          [2] 2Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Sugarcane Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement (Guangxi), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Nanning 530007, China
          Author notes
          *Corresponding authors: XING Yong-xiu, E-mail: document126@ 123456126.com ; LI Yang-rui, E-mail: liyr@ 123456gxaas.net
          Article
          j.issn.2095-1191.2020.10.005
          10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2020.10.005
          8fc48634-8b9e-4288-aa46-27694772a5d9
          © 2020 Journal of Southern Agriculture

          This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

          History
          Funding
          Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China
          Award ID: 31560352
          Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China
          Award ID: 31360293
          Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China
          Award ID: 31471449
          Funded by: Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent Special Project
          Award ID: Guike AD17195100
          Categories
          Journal Article

          Crops,Animal agriculture,Agricultural ecology,General agriculture,Agriculture,Horticulture
          soil enzyme activity,soil bacterial community structure,soil nutrient,plant growth-promoting bacteria

          Comments

          Comment on this article