41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Structural and Functional Integration of the PLCγ Interaction Domains Critical for Regulatory Mechanisms and Signaling Deregulation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Multidomain proteins incorporating interaction domains are central to regulation of cellular processes. The elucidation of structural organization and mechanistic insights into many of these proteins, however, remain challenging due to their inherent flexibility. Here, we describe the organization and function of four interaction domains in PLCγ1 using a combination of structural biology and biochemical approaches. Intramolecular interactions within the regulatory region center on the cSH2 domain, the only domain that also interacts with the PLC-core. In the context of fibroblast growth-factor receptor signaling, the coordinated involvement of nSH2 and cSH2 domains mediates efficient phosphorylation of PLCγ1 resulting in the interruption of an autoinhibitory interface by direct competition and, independently, dissociation of PLCγ1 from the receptor. Further structural insights into the autoinhibitory surfaces provide a framework to interpret gain-of-function mutations in PLCγ isoforms linked to immune disorders and illustrate a distinct mechanism for regulation of PLC activity by common interaction domains.

          Abstract

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          ► Domains from PLCγ regulatory region show structural and functional integration ► Only cSH2 domain interacts with the PLC-core forming a high affinity surface ► Activation involves removal of autoinhibition and dissociation from the receptor ► Disease-linked mutations map to the autoinhibitory interface

          Abstract

          Structural studies of multi-domain proteins provide a considerable challenge due to the presence of flexible regions not amenable to crystallography. Bunney et al. describe a strategy that generated new insights into the structural organization and integration of individual domains comprising PLCγ.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Crystal structure of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2.

          The structure of the SHP-2 tyrosine phosphatase, determined at 2.0 angstroms resolution, shows how its catalytic activity is regulated by its two SH2 domains. In the absence of a tyrosine-phosphorylated binding partner, the N-terminal SH2 domain binds the phosphatase domain and directly blocks its active site. This interaction alters the structure of the N-SH2 domain, disrupting its phosphopeptide-binding cleft. Conversely, interaction of the N-SH2 domain with phosphopeptide disrupts its phosphatase recognition surface. Thus, the N-SH2 domain is a conformational switch; it either binds and inhibits the phosphatase, or it binds phosphoproteins and activates the enzyme. Recognition of bisphosphorylated ligands by the tandem SH2 domains is an integral element of this switch; the C-terminal SH2 domain contributes binding energy and specificity, but it does not have a direct role in activation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cell signaling in space and time: where proteins come together and when they're apart.

            Signal transduction can be defined as the coordinated relay of messages derived from extracellular cues to intracellular effectors. More simply put, information received on the cell surface is processed across the plasma membrane and transmitted to intracellular targets. This requires that the activators, effectors, enzymes, and substrates that respond to cellular signals come together when they need to.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Structural analysis of intrinsically disordered proteins by small-angle X-ray scattering.

              Small-angle scattering of X-rays (SAXS) is an established method to study the overall structure and structural transitions of biological macromolecules in solution. For folded proteins, the technique provides three-dimensional low resolution structures ab initio or it can be used to drive rigid-body modeling. SAXS is also a powerful tool for the quantitative analysis of flexible systems, including intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), and is highly complementary to the high resolution methods of X-ray crystallography and NMR. Here we present the basic principles of SAXS and review the main approaches to the characterization of IDPs and flexible multidomain proteins using SAXS. Together with the standard approaches based on the analysis of overall parameters, a recently developed Ensemble Optimization Method (EOM) is now available. The latter method allows for the co-existence of multiple protein conformations in solution compatible with the scattering data. Analysis of the selected ensembles provides quantitative information about flexibility and also offers insights into structural features. Examples of the use of SAXS and combined approaches with NMR, X-ray crystallography, and computational methods to characterize completely or partially disordered proteins are presented.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Structure
                Structure
                Structure(London, England:1993)
                Cell Press
                0969-2126
                1878-4186
                05 December 2012
                05 December 2012
                : 20
                : 12
                : 2062-2075
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
                [2 ]Division of Molecular Structure, MRC-National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK
                [3 ]Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 7, 1030 Vienna, Austria
                [4 ]ISMB, Birkbeck College, London WC1 7HX, UK
                [5 ]European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Hamburg Outstation c/o DESY, Notkestrasse 85, 22603 Hamburg, Germany
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author m.katan@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Article
                STFODE2540
                10.1016/j.str.2012.09.005
                3532599
                23063561
                8f6d3b4b-8a97-435b-a6fc-38ad83f23406
                © 2012 ELL & Excerpta Medica.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 16 July 2012
                : 3 September 2012
                : 7 September 2012
                Categories
                Article

                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article