9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Methane Emissions from Ruminants in Australia: Mitigation Potential and Applicability of Mitigation Strategies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          Methane is a potent greenhouse gas. It is 80-times more effective at heating the earth than carbon dioxide over the first 20 years following release into the atmosphere. Ruminant animals have diverse microbial populations in their stomachs that employ anaerobic fermentation to digest feed. Methane is belched into the atmosphere as a by-product of the digestive process. This gut, or enteric methane, primarily from cattle, but also sheep and goats, contributes 30% of the methane released into the earth’s atmosphere each day, and is more than any other single methane source. A major reduction in methane emissions from ruminants is crucial to preserve ecosystems on the planet. Various strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions in farm operations are reviewed to quantify their mitigation potential, determine their impact on animal productivity and likelihood of adoption. Two feed supplements, a commercial product, 3-NOP (Bovaer ®), and the seaweed, Asparagopsis, can reduce methane emissions by 40+% and 90%, respectively, with associated increases in animal productivity and no adverse effects on animal health or product quality. The rumen microbial population can also be changed to provide long-term intergenerational reduction in methane emissions, if treated herds remain isolated from non-treated animals.

          Abstract

          Anthropomorphic greenhouse gases are raising the temperature of the earth and threatening ecosystems. Since 1950 atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased 28%, while methane has increased 70%. Methane, over the first 20 years after release, has 80-times more warming potential as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Enteric methane from microbial fermentation of plant material by ruminants contributes 30% of methane released into the atmosphere, which is more than any other single source. Numerous strategies were reviewed to quantify their methane mitigation potential, their impact on animal productivity and their likelihood of adoption. The supplements, 3-nitrooxypropanol and the seaweed, Asparagopsis, reduced methane emissions by 40+% and 90%, respectively, with increases in animal productivity and small effects on animal health or product quality. Manipulation of the rumen microbial population can potentially provide intergenerational reduction in methane emissions, if treated animals remain isolated. Genetic selection, vaccination, grape marc, nitrate or biochar reduced methane emissions by 10% or less. Best management practices and cattle browsing legumes, Desmanthus or Leucaena species, result in small levels of methane mitigation and improved animal productivity. Feeding large amounts daily of ground wheat reduced methane emissions by around 35% in dairy cows but was not sustained over time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references122

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Methane emissions from cattle.

          Increasing atmospheric concentrations of methane have led scientists to examine its sources of origin. Ruminant livestock can produce 250 to 500 L of methane per day. This level of production results in estimates of the contribution by cattle to global warming that may occur in the next 50 to 100 yr to be a little less than 2%. Many factors influence methane emissions from cattle and include the following: level of feed intake, type of carbohydrate in the diet, feed processing, addition of lipids or ionophores to the diet, and alterations in the ruminal microflora. Manipulation of these factors can reduce methane emissions from cattle. Many techniques exist to quantify methane emissions from individual or groups of animals. Enclosure techniques are precise but require trained animals and may limit animal movement. Isotopic and nonisotopic tracer techniques may also be used effectively. Prediction equations based on fermentation balance or feed characteristics have been used to estimate methane production. These equations are useful, but the assumptions and conditions that must be met for each equation limit their ability to accurately predict methane production. Methane production from groups of animals can be measured by mass balance, micrometeorological, or tracer methods. These techniques can measure methane emissions from animals in either indoor or outdoor enclosures. Use of these techniques and knowledge of the factors that impact methane production can result in the development of mitigation strategies to reduce methane losses by cattle. Implementation of these strategies should result in enhanced animal productivity and decreased contributions by cattle to the atmospheric methane budget.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance.

              Biochars (n=94) were found to have ash contents from 0.4% to 88.2%, volatile matter from 13.2% to 70.0%, and fixed carbon from 0% to 77.4% (w/w). Greater pyrolysis temperature for low-ash biochars increased fixed carbon, but decreased it for biochars with more than 20% ash. Nitrogen recovery varied depending on feedstock used to a greater extent (12-68%) than organic (25-45%) or total C (41-76%) at a pyrolysis temperature of 600 °C. Fixed carbon production ranged from no enrichment in poultry biochar to a 10-fold increase in corn biochar (at 600 °C). Prediction of biochar stability was improved by a combination of volatile matter and H:C ratios corrected for inorganic C. In contrast to stability, agronomic utility of biochars is not an absolute value, as it needs to meet local soil constraints. Woody feedstock demonstrated the greatest versatility with pH values ranging from 4 to 9. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Animals (Basel)
                Animals (Basel)
                animals
                Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
                MDPI
                2076-2615
                29 March 2021
                April 2021
                : 11
                : 4
                : 951
                Affiliations
                [1 ]John L Black Consulting, Warrimoo, NSW 2774, Australia
                [2 ]Livestock Productivity Partnership, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia; thomas.davison@ 123456une.edu.au
                [3 ]Ilona Box Consulting, Warrimoo, NSW 2774, Australia; ilonabox8@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: jblack@ 123456pnc.com.au
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7349-8239
                Article
                animals-11-00951
                10.3390/ani11040951
                8066058
                33805324
                8f550ee0-156f-49fc-a28a-538484c46ee6
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 March 2021
                : 26 March 2021
                Categories
                Review

                enteric methane,methane mitigation,genetic selection,vaccination,grape marc,nitrate,biochar,3-nitrooxypropanol,asparagopsis,rumen microbe manipulation

                Comments

                Comment on this article