108
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Plastic pollution is a pervasive and growing problem. To estimate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce plastic pollution, we modeled stocks and flows of municipal solid waste and four sources of microplastics through the global plastic system for five scenarios between 2016 and 2040. Implementing all feasible interventions reduced plastic pollution by 40% from 2016 rates and 78% relative to ‘business as usual’ in 2040. Even with immediate and concerted action, 710 million metric tons of plastic waste cumulatively entered aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. To avoid a massive build-up of plastic in the environment, coordinated global action is urgently needed to reduce plastic consumption, increase rates of reuse, waste collection and recycling, expand safe disposal systems and accelerate innovation in the plastic value chain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems

          Microplastics (plastics < 5 mm, including nanoplastics which are < 0.1 μm) originate from the fragmentation of large plastic litter or from direct environmental emission. Their potential impacts in terrestrial ecosystems remain largely unexplored despite numerous reported effects on marine organisms. Most plastics arriving in the oceans were produced, used, and often disposed on land. Hence, it is within terrestrial systems that microplastics might first interact with biota eliciting ecologically relevant impacts. This article introduces the pervasive microplastic contamination as a potential agent of global change in terrestrial systems, highlights the physical and chemical nature of the respective observed effects, and discusses the broad toxicity of nanoplastics derived from plastic breakdown. Making relevant links to the fate of microplastics in aquatic continental systems, we here present new insights into the mechanisms of impacts on terrestrial geochemistry, the biophysical environment, and ecotoxicology. Broad changes in continental environments are possible even in particle-rich habitats such as soils. Furthermore, there is a growing body of evidence indicating that microplastics interact with terrestrial organisms that mediate essential ecosystem services and functions, such as soil dwelling invertebrates, terrestrial fungi, and plant-pollinators. Therefore, research is needed to clarify the terrestrial fate and effects of microplastics. We suggest that due to the widespread presence, environmental persistence, and various interactions with continental biota, microplastic pollution might represent an emerging global change threat to terrestrial ecosystems.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic

            Ocean plastic can persist in sea surface waters, eventually accumulating in remote areas of the world’s oceans. Here we characterise and quantify a major ocean plastic accumulation zone formed in subtropical waters between California and Hawaii: The Great Pacific Garbage Patch (GPGP). Our model, calibrated with data from multi-vessel and aircraft surveys, predicted at least 79 (45–129) thousand tonnes of ocean plastic are floating inside an area of 1.6 million km2; a figure four to sixteen times higher than previously reported. We explain this difference through the use of more robust methods to quantify larger debris. Over three-quarters of the GPGP mass was carried by debris larger than 5 cm and at least 46% was comprised of fishing nets. Microplastics accounted for 8% of the total mass but 94% of the estimated 1.8 (1.1–3.6) trillion pieces floating in the area. Plastic collected during our study has specific characteristics such as small surface-to-volume ratio, indicating that only certain types of debris have the capacity to persist and accumulate at the surface of the GPGP. Finally, our results suggest that ocean plastic pollution within the GPGP is increasing exponentially and at a faster rate than in surrounding waters.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The circular economy.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Science
                Science
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                July 23 2020
                : eaba9475
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Pew Charitable Trusts, 901 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20004, USA.
                [2 ]SYSTEMIQ, 69 Carter Lane, London EC4V 5EQ, UK.
                [3 ]School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK.
                [4 ]School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
                [5 ]Institute of Geography, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
                [6 ]Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
                [7 ]EA— Shaping Environmental Action, Ch. des vignes d’argent 7, CH 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland.
                [8 ]University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland//HES-SO, HEIG-VD, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland.
                [9 ]School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK.
                [10 ]Faculty of Natural Sciences, Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AX, UK.
                [11 ]Nextek, 1 Kensington Gore London SW7 2AR, UK.
                [12 ]Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza, Viale Cavriga 3 20900 Monza (MB), Italy.
                [13 ]Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
                [14 ]Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries and School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
                Article
                10.1126/science.aba9475
                32703909
                8f344447-8215-4a64-bb29-c41461836491
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article