1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Enablers and barriers to military veterans seeking help for mental health and alcohol difficulties: A systematic review of the quantitative evidence

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Research exploring the enablers and barriers that exist for military veterans seeking to address their poor mental health has produced ambiguous results. To identify the enablers and barriers correctly, this study systematically reviews the literature, including research that included alcohol and had a clearly defined veteran population.

          Methods

          Six databases were searched. Inclusion criteria specified that empirical studies related to veterans that had ceased military service and were seeking help for poor mental health and/or alcohol difficulties. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and AXIS appraisal tools were used to assess quality and bias. A narrative synthesis approach was adopted for analysis. From 2044 studies screened, 12 were included featuring 5501 participants.

          Results

          Forty-four enablers and barriers were identified, with thirty-two being statistically significant. Post-traumatic stress disorder had the greatest number of enabler/barrier endorsements to veterans seeking help. Depression, anxiety, experience and attitudes also acted as enablers/barriers. Most studies were of fair methodological quality. Limitations included that samples were skewed towards US army veterans. Little research exists concerning those that have ceased military service.

          Conclusions

          Veteran help-seeking is likely enabled by poor mental health symptomology and comorbidity, which suggests veterans reach a crisis point before they seek help. Further research on alcohol misuse and attitude formation is required. The field would also benefit from alternative study designs including qualitative studies with non-US participants.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)

            Objectives The aim of this study was to develop a critical appraisal (CA) tool that addressed study design and reporting quality as well as the risk of bias in cross-sectional studies (CSSs). In addition, the aim was to produce a help document to guide the non-expert user through the tool. Design An initial scoping review of the published literature and key epidemiological texts was undertaken prior to the formation of a Delphi panel to establish key components for a CA tool for CSSs. A consensus of 80% was required from the Delphi panel for any component to be included in the final tool. Results An initial list of 39 components was identified through examination of existing resources. An international Delphi panel of 18 medical and veterinary experts was established. After 3 rounds of the Delphi process, the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) was developed by consensus and consisted of 20 components. A detailed explanatory document was also developed with the tool, giving expanded explanation of each question and providing simple interpretations and examples of the epidemiological concepts being examined in each question to aid non-expert users. Conclusions CA of the literature is a vital step in evidence synthesis and therefore evidence-based decision-making in a number of different disciplines. The AXIS tool is therefore unique and was developed in a way that it can be used across disciplines to aid the inclusion of CSSs in systematic reviews, guidelines and clinical decision-making.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies

              Psychological Medicine, 45(1), 11-27
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Health Serv Res Policy
                J Health Serv Res Policy
                sphsr
                HSR
                Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1355-8196
                1758-1060
                13 January 2023
                July 2023
                : 28
                : 3
                : 197-211
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Stress Trauma and Related Conditions (STARC) Research Lab, School of Psychology, Ringgold 1596, universityQueen’s University Belfast; , Northern Ireland, UK
                [2 ]School of Psychology, Ringgold 1596, universityQueen’s University Belfast; , Northern Ireland, UK
                Author notes
                [*]Catherine Hitch, School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, 18-30 Malone Road, Belfast BT9 5BN, Northern Ireland, UK. Email: chitch01@ 123456qub.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-8910
                Article
                10.1177_13558196221149930
                10.1177/13558196221149930
                10363942
                36636855
                8e8c617b-c6f4-4041-9d9b-24cf10405e9f
                © The Author(s) 2023

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Royal British Legion, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100008631;
                Award ID: EGR17Q4/100015
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                ts10

                Social policy & Welfare
                veterans,help-seeking,systematic review
                Social policy & Welfare
                veterans, help-seeking, systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article