100
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Global aviation operations contribute to anthropogenic climate change via a complex set of processes that lead to a net surface warming. Of importance are aviation emissions of carbon dioxide (CO 2), nitrogen oxides (NO x), water vapor, soot and sulfate aerosols, and increased cloudiness due to contrail formation. Aviation grew strongly over the past decades (1960–2018) in terms of activity, with revenue passenger kilometers increasing from 109 to 8269 billion km yr −1, and in terms of climate change impacts, with CO 2 emissions increasing by a factor of 6.8–1034 Tg CO 2 yr −1. Over the period 2013–2018, the growth rates in both terms show a marked increase. Here, we present a new comprehensive and quantitative approach for evaluating aviation climate forcing terms. Both radiative forcing (RF) and effective radiative forcing (ERF) terms and their sums are calculated for the years 2000–2018. Contrail cirrus, consisting of linear contrails and the cirrus cloudiness arising from them, yields the largest positive net (warming) ERF term followed by CO 2 and NO x emissions. The formation and emission of sulfate aerosol yields a negative (cooling) term. The mean contrail cirrus ERF/RF ratio of 0.42 indicates that contrail cirrus is less effective in surface warming than other terms. For 2018 the net aviation ERF is +100.9 mW (mW) m −2 (5–95% likelihood range of (55, 145)) with major contributions from contrail cirrus (57.4 mW m −2), CO 2 (34.3 mW m −2), and NO x (17.5 mW m −2). Non-CO 2 terms sum to yield a net positive (warming) ERF that accounts for more than half (66%) of the aviation net ERF in 2018. Using normalization to aviation fuel use, the contribution of global aviation in 2011 was calculated to be 3.5 (4.0, 3.4) % of the net anthropogenic ERF of 2290 (1130, 3330) mW m −2. Uncertainty distributions (5%, 95%) show that non-CO 2 forcing terms contribute about 8 times more than CO 2 to the uncertainty in the aviation net ERF in 2018. The best estimates of the ERFs from aviation aerosol-cloud interactions for soot and sulfate remain undetermined. CO 2-warming-equivalent emissions based on global warming potentials (GWP* method) indicate that aviation emissions are currently warming the climate at approximately three times the rate of that associated with aviation CO 2 emissions alone. CO 2 and NO x aviation emissions and cloud effects remain a continued focus of anthropogenic climate change research and policy discussions.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • Global aviation warms Earth's surface through both CO 2 and net non-CO 2 contributions.

          • Global aviation contributes a few percent to anthropogenic radiative forcing.

          • Non-CO 2 impacts comprise about 2/3 of the net radiative forcing.

          • Comprehensive and quantitative calculations of aviation effects are presented.

          • Data are made available to analyze past, present and future aviation climate forcing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references123

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos.

              Plausible estimates for the effect of soot on snow and ice albedos (1.5% in the Arctic and 3% in Northern Hemisphere land areas) yield a climate forcing of +0.3 W/m(2) in the Northern Hemisphere. The "efficacy" of this forcing is approximately 2, i.e., for a given forcing it is twice as effective as CO(2) in altering global surface air temperature. This indirect soot forcing may have contributed to global warming of the past century, including the trend toward early springs in the Northern Hemisphere, thinning Arctic sea ice, and melting land ice and permafrost. If, as we suggest, melting ice and sea level rise define the level of dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system, then reducing soot emissions, thus restoring snow albedos to pristine high values, would have the double benefit of reducing global warming and raising the global temperature level at which dangerous anthropogenic interference occurs. However, soot contributions to climate change do not alter the conclusion that anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been the main cause of recent global warming and will be the predominant climate forcing in the future.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Atmos Environ (1994)
                Atmos Environ (1994)
                Atmospheric Environment (Oxford, England : 1994)
                Elsevier Ltd.
                1352-2310
                1352-2310
                3 September 2020
                3 September 2020
                : 117834
                Affiliations
                [a ]Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, John Dalton Building, Chester Street, Manchester, M1 5GD, United Kingdom
                [b ]NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory (CSL), Boulder, CO, USA
                [c ]School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [d ]Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
                [e ]State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
                [f ]Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
                [g ]School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
                [h ]CICERO—Center for International Climate Research—Oslo, PO Box 1129, Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway
                [i ]National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
                [j ]Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, 2455 Hayward St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2143, USA
                [k ]Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, 3329 Croul Hall, CA, 92697-3100, USA
                [l ]Department of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Università dell'Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
                [m ]National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading, RG6 6BB, UK
                [n ]Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [o ]Committee on Climate Change, 151 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 9SZ, UK
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author.
                Article
                S1352-2310(20)30568-9 117834
                10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834
                7468346
                32895604
                8deecfa5-cf81-46dc-9bb4-0aa6f442426e
                © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 9 February 2020
                : 2 July 2020
                : 30 July 2020
                Categories
                Article

                aviation,contrail cirrus,climate,radiative forcing,co2,nox
                aviation, contrail cirrus, climate, radiative forcing, co2, nox

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content396

                Cited by188

                Most referenced authors1,686