1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The more you do it, the easier it gets: using behaviour change theory to support health care professionals offering reproductive genetic carrier screening

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recent advances in genomic sequencing have improved the accessibility of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). As awareness and interest grows, non-genetic health care professionals are increasingly offering RGCS to consumers. We conducted a qualitative interview study informed by behaviour change theory to identify influences on health care professionals considered as ‘early adopters’ offering RGCS through Mackenzie’s Mission, an Australian national research study investigating the implementation of free RGCS to couple’s preconception or in early pregnancy. Interviews were deductively analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework to examine barriers and enabling factors. In total, we interviewed 31 health care professionals, who were primarily general practitioners ( n = 23) offering RGCS through Mackenzie’s Mission. Upon analysis, 15 barriers and 44 enablers to implementation were identified and categorised across three health care professional target behaviours 1. Engaging with RGCS, 2. Identifying eligible patients, and 3. Offering RGCS. Whilst all Theoretical Domains Framework domains were present, barriers were predominantly categorised as ‘Environmental Context and Resources’ e.g., lack of time, followed by ‘Knowledge’ e.g., lack of understanding about genetics and ‘Beliefs about Capabilities’ e.g., concern about giving high risk results to patients. Although health care professionals expressed a preference for offering RGCS through a comprehensive and supported model of care, such as Mackenzie’s Mission, barriers remain. By understanding what drives current health care professionals’ behaviour towards offering RGCS, behaviour change theory provides an avenue to direct future efforts based on evidence and improve service delivery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance

          The UK Medical Research Council’s widely used guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions has been replaced by a new framework, commissioned jointly by the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research, which takes account of recent developments in theory and methods and the need to maximise the efficiency, use, and impact of research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.

            Implementing new practices requires changes in the behaviour of relevant actors, and this is facilitated by understanding of the determinants of current and desired behaviours. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was developed by a collaboration of behavioural scientists and implementation researchers who identified theories relevant to implementation and grouped constructs from these theories into domains. The collaboration aimed to provide a comprehensive, theory-informed approach to identify determinants of behaviour. The first version was published in 2005, and a subsequent version following a validation exercise was published in 2012. This guide offers practical guidance for those who wish to apply the TDF to assess implementation problems and support intervention design. It presents a brief rationale for using a theoretical approach to investigate and address implementation problems, summarises the TDF and its development, and describes how to apply the TDF to achieve implementation objectives. Examples from the implementation research literature are presented to illustrate relevant methods and practical considerations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                stephanie.best@petermac.org
                Journal
                Eur J Hum Genet
                Eur J Hum Genet
                European Journal of Human Genetics
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1018-4813
                1476-5438
                24 November 2022
                24 November 2022
                : 1-15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1004.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2158 5405, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, , Macquarie University, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.1058.c, ISNI 0000 0000 9442 535X, Australian Genomics, , Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, ; Melbourne, VIC Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.1055.1, ISNI 0000000403978434, Dept of Health Services Research, , Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, ; Parkville, Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.431578.c, ISNI 0000 0004 5939 3689, Dept of Health Services Research, , Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance, ; Parkville, Australia
                [5 ]GRID grid.1008.9, ISNI 0000 0001 2179 088X, Sir Peter MacCallum Dept of Oncology, , University of Melbourne, ; Parkville, Australia
                [6 ]GRID grid.416107.5, ISNI 0000 0004 0614 0346, Bruce Lefroy Centre, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, , Royal Children’s Hospital, ; Melbourne, VIC Australia
                [7 ]GRID grid.1008.9, ISNI 0000 0001 2179 088X, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, , University of Melbourne, ; Melbourne, VIC Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1107-8976
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0553-682X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8449-206X
                Article
                1224
                10.1038/s41431-022-01224-5
                9686264
                36424524
                8dbd7b75-443f-46a6-a320-3e3cd92bb5ec
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 3 June 2022
                : 19 October 2022
                : 25 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Government's Medical Research Future Funds as part of the Genomics Health Futures Mission grant GHFM73390 (MRFF-G-MM).
                Funded by: Australian Government's Medical Research Future Funds as part of the Genomics Health Futures Mission grant GHFM73390 (MRFF-G-MM).
                Funded by: Australian Government's Medical Research Future Funds as part of the Genomics Health Futures Mission grant GHFM73390 (MRFF-G-MM).
                Funded by: Australian Government's Medical Research Future Funds as part of the Genomics Health Futures Mission grant GHFM73390 (MRFF-G-MM).
                Funded by: Australian Government's Medical Research Future Funds as part of the Genomics Health Futures Mission grant GHFM73390 (MRFF-G-MM).
                Funded by: Australian Government's Medical Research Future Funds as part of the Genomics Health Futures Mission grant GHFM73390 (MRFF-G-MM).
                Categories
                Article

                Genetics
                genetic testing,population screening
                Genetics
                genetic testing, population screening

                Comments

                Comment on this article