11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The phenomenology of gender dysphoria in adults: A systematic review and meta-synthesis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gender dysphoria is distress due to a discrepancy between one's assigned gender and gender identity. Adults who wish to access gender clinics are assessed to ensure they meet the diagnostic criteria for gender dysphoria. Therefore, the definition of gender dysphoria has a significant impact on the lives of individuals who wish to undergo physical gender transition. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize all existing qualitative research literature about the lived experience of gender dysphoria in adults. A pre-planned systematic search identified 1491 papers, with 20 of those meeting full inclusion criteria, and a quality assessment of each paper was conducted. Data pertaining to the lived experience of gender dysphoria were extracted from each paper and a meta-ethnographic synthesis was conducted. Four overarching concepts were identified; distress due to dissonance of assigned and experienced gender; interface of assigned gender, gender identity and society; social consequences of gender identity; internal processing of rejection, and transphobia. A key finding was the reciprocal relationship between an individual's feelings about their gender and societal responses to transgender people. Other subthemes contributing to distress were misgendering, mismatch between gender identity and societal expectations, and hypervigilance for transphobia.

          Highlights

          • A systematic review of all papers on the lived experience of gender dysphoria

          • Twenty papers with 1606 participants were included in a meta-ethnographic synthesis.

          • Distress was due to gender and sex incongruence, as well as social factors.

          • Results give new insights into the relationships between factors causing distress.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

          Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender-Nonconforming People, Version 7

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ

              Background The syntheses of multiple qualitative studies can pull together data across different contexts, generate new theoretical or conceptual models, identify research gaps, and provide evidence for the development, implementation and evaluation of health interventions. This study aims to develop a framework for reporting the synthesis of qualitative health research. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search for guidance and reviews relevant to the synthesis of qualitative research, methodology papers, and published syntheses of qualitative health research in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and relevant organisational websites to May 2011. Initial items were generated inductively from guides to synthesizing qualitative health research. The preliminary checklist was piloted against forty published syntheses of qualitative research, purposively selected to capture a range of year of publication, methods and methodologies, and health topics. We removed items that were duplicated, impractical to assess, and rephrased items for clarity. Results The Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ) statement consists of 21 items grouped into five main domains: introduction, methods and methodology, literature search and selection, appraisal, and synthesis of findings. Conclusions The ENTREQ statement can help researchers to report the stages most commonly associated with the synthesis of qualitative health research: searching and selecting qualitative research, quality appraisal, and methods for synthesising qualitative findings. The synthesis of qualitative research is an expanding and evolving methodological area and we would value feedback from all stakeholders for the continued development and extension of the ENTREQ statement.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Clin Psychol Rev
                Clin Psychol Rev
                Clinical Psychology Review
                Elsevier Science
                0272-7358
                1873-7811
                1 August 2020
                August 2020
                : 80
                : 101875
                Affiliations
                [a ]Centre for Applied Autism Research, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
                [b ]UCL Research Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
                [c ]Department of Psychology, University of Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. k.cooper@ 123456bath.ac.uk
                Article
                S0272-7358(20)30063-5 101875
                10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101875
                7441311
                32629301
                8cb6238f-f5aa-4cd0-9f0a-4209405f20d5
                © 2020 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 4 November 2019
                : 29 March 2020
                : 31 May 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                gender dysphoria,transgender,gender diversity,psychological distress,mental health

                Comments

                Comment on this article